BREAKING: CDC Whistleblower Confesses to MMR Vaccine Research Fraud

BREAKING: CDC whistleblower William Thompson has now gone public with a statement posted on the website of the law firm representing him, Morgan Verkamp LLC. (See the full statement reprinted below.)

The statement opens with a blatant admission of scientific fraud at the CDC:

My name is William Thompson. I am a Senior Scientist with the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, where I have worked since 1998. I regret that my coauthors and I omitted statistically significant information in our 2004 article published in the journal Pediatrics. The omitted data suggested that African American males who received the MMR vaccine before age 36 months were at increased risk for autism. Decisions were made regarding which findings to report after the data were collected, and I believe that the final study protocol was not followed.

It appears conspiracy theorists were right all along as CDC senior scientist Dr. William Thompson has now gone public in admitting that he and other CDC scientists deliberately omitted key study data showing MMR vaccines posed increased health risks. We finally have the smoking gun proof that the CDC lies to us the public.

Add this to other rampant Goverment corruption and you get a clear picture of a culture of lies at the highest levels of the very agencies in place to protect the health and well-being of its citizens. You would almost have to be naive to believe ANYTHING coming from Goverment agencies these days.

One thing is clear...your health IS NOT the primary concern of the CDC.

SOURCE

A decent video on this story:

We told you recently about a new whistleblower inside the CDC. Now, we know his name: Doctor William Thompson. Doctor Thompson shared his story with Doctor Brian Hooker. Thompson says he stayed quiet for over 10 years after finding a link between vaccines in young black children and autism. Thompson says the CDC knew about this link, and purposely manipulated the evidence removing “Black Babies without birth certificates” from the study to justify their own multi-billion dollar vaccination operation.

Why just black children though? Why not White children?

a reply to: Murgatroid

A video filled with lies you mean?

Shouldn't this thread be closed.

Previous thread here.




Also, No whistleblower, and nothing new. The real story...

a reply to: OccamsRazor04

Exactly my question. Why only black children was this something inexplicable or deliberate? Its an area I know nothing about so hope someone can explain?

I believe you will find this story has already got a thread running here:

Vaccine Fraud: U.S. Mainstream Media Censors Whistleblower’s Explosive Story

originally posted by: boncho
a reply to: Murgatroid

A video filled with lies you mean?

Shouldn't this thread be closed.

Previous thread here.




Also, No whistleblower, and nothing new. The real story...

This thread is about the actual admission of the wrong-doing at the CDC. He has released a statement through his lawyer. This is NEW information. Why should it be closed? The truth needs to be told.

originally posted by: TheDon
I believe you will find this story has already got a thread running here:

Vaccine Fraud: U.S. Mainstream Media Censors Whistleblower’s Explosive Story

This is NEW. This is about the statement released by Dr Thompson verifying the authenticity of the earlier email which had been in dispute.

a reply to: Metallicus

The CDC has not admitted anything.

Best case scenario is the vaccine only causes autism if you are Black, Male, and have no birth certificate.

Also of note .... This is how shady the anti-vaccine crowd is ...

I have had many discussions with Dr. Brian Hooker over the last 10 months regarding studies the CDC has carried out regarding vaccines and neurodevelopmental outcomes including autism spectrum disorders. I share his beliefthat CDC decision-making and analyses should be transparent. I was not, however, aware that he was recording any of our conversations, nor was I given any choice regarding whether my name would be made public or my voice would be put on the Internet.

He clearly is not a very willing participant.

I want to be absolutely clear that I believe vaccines have saved and continue to save countless lives. I would never suggest that any parent avoid vaccinating children of any race.

Reasonable scientists can and do differ in their interpretation of information.

originally posted by: OccamsRazor04
a reply to: Metallicus

The CDC has not admitted anything.

Best case scenario is the vaccine only causes autism if you are Black, Male...

I guess if it doesn't affect you it doesn't matter then. Who cares about black males, right? Regardless, this isn't a anti-vaccine thread it is anti-corruption thread.

my son was born in 2005 and my sons doctor accually told me that he wanted to wait for my son to get his mmr till after he was 3 and was recomending all the parents that he seen with a history of autisum in there family not to get the shot till after 3 if ever and this was a year after this report so i think even the doctors not working at the cdc knew

.... This is how shady the anti-vaccine crowd is ...

This is an important issue. People at the top level of Goverment organization intentionally lied about vaccine risks. Why should this be swept under the rug because it is inconvenient?

ETA: I am NOT anti-vaccine I am pro-truth. People have a right to all the facts to make an informed decision.

originally posted by: Metallicus

originally posted by: OccamsRazor04
a reply to: Metallicus

The CDC has not admitted anything.

Best case scenario is the vaccine only causes autism if you are Black, Male...

I guess if it doesn't affect you it doesn't matter then. Who cares about black males, right? Regardless, this isn't a anti-vaccine thread it is anti-corruption thread.

Where the "whistleblower" is not coming forward, someone made public private communications without asking him.

As long as I have a birth certificate I would be fine .. how odd.

originally posted by: Metallicus

.... This is how shady the anti-vaccine crowd is ...

This is an important issue. People at the top level of Goverment organization intentionally lied about vaccine risks. Why should this be swept under the rug because it is inconvenient?

ETA: I am NOT anti-vaccine I am pro-truth. People have a right to all the facts to make an informed decision.

Because the "whistleblower" was recorded secretly and he thinks the vaccine is good.

So the TRUTH is he thinks the vaccine is good and is important. the LIE is he is being made out to say the opposite, by the same scumbags who secretly recorded friendly conversations and made them public against his will.

originally posted by: OccamsRazor04

originally posted by: Metallicus

originally posted by: OccamsRazor04
a reply to: Metallicus

The CDC has not admitted anything.

Best case scenario is the vaccine only causes autism if you are Black, Male...

I guess if it doesn't affect you it doesn't matter then. Who cares about black males, right? Regardless, this isn't a anti-vaccine thread it is anti-corruption thread.

Where the "whistleblower" is not coming forward, someone made public private communications without asking him.

Actually the whistleblower DID come forward and admit to wrongdoing through his lawyer. His statement admitting the fraud is part of the OP. The fact that he was outed for wrong-doing by someone else doesn't somehow excuse what he and others did.

originally posted by: Metallicus

originally posted by: OccamsRazor04

originally posted by: Metallicus

originally posted by: OccamsRazor04
a reply to: Metallicus

The CDC has not admitted anything.

Best case scenario is the vaccine only causes autism if you are Black, Male...

I guess if it doesn't affect you it doesn't matter then. Who cares about black males, right? Regardless, this isn't a anti-vaccine thread it is anti-corruption thread.

Where the "whistleblower" is not coming forward, someone made public private communications without asking him.

Actually the whistleblower DID come forward and admit to wrongdoing through his lawyer. His statement admitting the fraud is part of the OP. The fact that he was outed for wrong-doing by someone else doesn't somehow excuse what he and others did.

No, he is making a public statement because someone already made public his PRIVATE conversations. So now he is FORCED to comment. That is not what a "whistleblower" is.

Now can you show me where he says anything about FRAUD in his statement?

originally posted by: Metallicus
Actually the whistleblower DID come forward and admit to wrongdoing through his lawyer. His statement admitting the fraud is part of the OP. The fact that he was outed for wrong-doing by someone else doesn't somehow excuse what he and others did.

Well it seems to me like this whole matter wouldn't have come to light unless Hooker chose to expose the fraud without Thompson's consent. So I can't really blame Hooker for releasing this information, it's a very important issue and I doubt Thompson would have blown the whistle on his own. The full statement from Thompson is available here.

a reply to: ChaoticOrder

Yeah, he wouldn't have done this on his own. Someone will have to be responsible for it.

Bringing up points from full statement shared,

I regret that my coauthors and I omitted statistically significant information in our 2004 article published in the journal Pediatrics. The omitted data suggested that African American males who received the MMR vaccine before age 36 months were at increased risk for autism. Decisions were made regarding which findings to report after the data were collected, and I believe that the final study protocol was not followed.

I know many think now that it's criminal in it's release, but apparently that's how you get to the bottom of things like this.
Why was that data omitted? Why was the final protocol not followed?

Oh, and before anyone wants to accuse me of Anti Vax: I have administered many vaccines being in my field. As well as, I support many for the protection and stopping of disease.

However, when we are lied to, especially that we see now, a racial demographics data is kept hushed up, then there's a major problem that should be questioned, and addressed accordingly.

Concluded that,

My colleagues and supervisors at the CDC have been entirely professional since this matter became public. In fact, I received a performance-based award after this story came out. I have experienced no pressure or retaliation and certainly was not escorted from the building, as some have stated.

Okay, well he did clarify these things now, stated as true on the older threads, as an update.

a reply to: dreamingawake

Exactly. No where in his statement is fraud found. Data was excluded. Data gets excluded all the time. In this case the black males that were excluded were ones with no birth certificate. Perhaps they felt these individuals had unreliable data which prevented them from finding confounding variables.

If black males with a birth certificate had no increased risk, and those without did, it suggests something unusual, that may have nothing to do with the vaccine.

I actually am somewhat anti-vax, at least some vaccines (such as the Flu vaccine for most people). I think what happened here should be looked into ... but so far no fraud has been admitted, and no actual autism link is established.