It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
originally posted by: alldaylong
originally posted by: NavyDoc
originally posted by: alldaylong
a reply to: NavyDoc
As for your previous replies i have ignored they come under the heading " You doth protest to much"
You keep repeating yourself over and over again. You are a gun fanatic and nothing that anyone says is going to change your opinion.
As for my last reply to you............maybe those are issues that you want to avoid. Then again, maybe you can accept them for the horrors that they are.
No, you Ignored them because they pointed out a very large flaw in your premise--a flaw that you are unable to address, so you ignore it.
Ok clever clogs, what would that flaw be ?
The only flaw i see is that i disagree with about everything you have stated.
originally posted by: alldaylong
originally posted by: NavyDoc
originally posted by: alldaylong
originally posted by: Auricom
a reply to: Briles1207
Records suggest that children can handle firearms safely. How many firearms are shot on a daily basis around the United States by children? Now, how many in the past five years have been killed, or killed someone?
With that being said, it is stupid to hand a child a firearm like that. It'd be one thing if she was shooting a little pea-shooter rifle, but an Uzi?
I'll refrain from the rather obtuse name calling of the dead.
At one time a nine year old was given a Barbi Doll.
How times have changed.............for the worse.
Actually, nine year olds would be out hunting for dinner for hundreds of years before Barbie dolls were invented. Methinks a little knowledge of history would be helpful.
Sounds like a backward society to me
When kids in the U.K. wanted something for dinner, they went to the shops.
Someone under 24 is a "child?" C'mon. Bull# is bull#. A 20 year old criminal who gets shot by the police in commission of a crime is neither a child nor a "victim." Do not get your "information" from a propaganda source.
originally posted by: meowningstar
Some facts to digest..
Children and guns by the numbers:
18: The number of people age 24 and younger killed by firearms in the US each day
55: The percentage of US homes with children and firearms in which one or more weapons are kept in an unlocked place
1.6: The number, in millions, of children 18 and under who are estimated to be living in homes with loaded and unlocked firearms
72: The percentage of parents who say they have spoken with their children about the hazards of guns
Source: Law Center to Prevent Gun Violence, ABC News
originally posted by: fleabit
This has nothing to do with liberties, gun rights, or anything else other than an incredibly stupid gun instructor allowed with his piss-poor training techniques to allow a young girl to try and fire an Uzi at his range. There is absolutely no reason for someone that age to be learning to fire an automatic weapon like an Uzi. STUPIDITY. There is NO POINT. She isn't going to need to fire an automatic weapon.. probably in her lifetime. It was pointless, and fatal to the moron, and probably a permanent and terrible scar for the poor girl.
Go preach your gun rights somewhere else. This shouldn't be used by EITHER side to try and gain leverage for their cause. If you feel this was just and smart to try to teach a 9 year old girl how to shoot an Uzi, you are simply WRONG.
originally posted by: meowningstar
a reply to: NavyDoc
soz colonel mustard..
I'm just raising some facts i dug up.
How would you know its propaganda? Did you write it?
Have these facts offended you? Is it because you condone violence?
originally posted by: Denoli
The only victim is the girl !
He deserves to be dead !
And her parents want jailing !
USA gun law is so stupid !
If this was another country all the Americans would be saying how sick it is !
originally posted by: Briles1207--->Why the hell does a 9 year old need to be taught how to use an Uzi?