It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
originally posted by: Yeahkeepwatchingme
I'll say it again. I've never seen a purple deer with red clothing and stick thin legs. I've never seen a bird with a purple, elongated face with a bright red body. If anyone can find a bird with a purple head and a bright red body I'd love to see it.
If it's a hoax it's a good one. If not, people see things all the time. Maybe this is one of them.
originally posted by: Dragoon01
originally posted by: Yeahkeepwatchingme
I'll say it again. I've never seen a purple deer with red clothing and stick thin legs. I've never seen a bird with a purple, elongated face with a bright red body. If anyone can find a bird with a purple head and a bright red body I'd love to see it.
If it's a hoax it's a good one. If not, people see things all the time. Maybe this is one of them.
Your assuming that these cameras have good color reporduction. They do not. They tend to saturate the entire area of the picture. These are low grade cameras they are like woodland security cameras. You would not shoot a movie with a CCTV camera at a gas station right? Well you would not use one of these to take real good pictures. Look at the "face" area you are seeing as purple. Now look at the most distant trees. They also look purple in the picture. If that "face" is acutally a deers white tail then its going to get washed out with that overall purple color showing up in the picture. The red is because this is a fawn. A redish brown fawn, and you are only picking up the redish hue of the side of the animal.
originally posted by: NoCorruptionAllowed
originally posted by: sheepslayer247
I just noticed the source piece is by Linda Moulton Howe.
Fail from the start....sorry.
She has done more than most to pull the cloak of secrecy away from taboo subjects like cattle mutilations and other things, and she has rattled more than a few cages in the FBI and the NSA, and global banking elite to boot. Her work to promote hydrogen from water for fuel really tee'd off the big banks who also own the 4 largest oil company conglomerates on the entire planet.
having said that I am sure she's made some mistakes and given plenty of ammo to the armchair peanut galleries, and to the ignorant news reporters of the status quo, but as to her contributions to the world, shes done more than most and her motives have been pure of heart.
And I think it would be far more productive to examine this particular odd happening instead of trying to debunk the whole thing based on the messenger, but then that isn't the MO of normal debunking. Normal debunking rule number 9 I think it is, is "When you can't discredit the facts of the reported phenomenon, go after the reporter of the story, or discredit the messenger".
Am I wrong about all of this?
originally posted by: Yeahkeepwatchingme
Yes it could most certainly be pareidolia but overall it doesn't add up either way. Has deer, bird, humanoid qualities. Or we're just seeing the front of the body. The head seems disproportionally large for a bird. A conehead too?
The cam is low grade but we're able to see bark on the trees, leaves both near and where the "entity" is. We can make out the outlines of smaller, further away trees in the distance. In the closeups there's a line where the cap begins on the forehead. Like a hairline or brim of a hat. Definitely eyes, eyelids or pronounced orbits.
Looking at the sequence of photographs, and also at the original images full size, showing the "creature" in respect to the entire scene, it seems like a tiny humanoid wearing a red colored jacket or shirt with long sleeves. Either a pointed hat the same color as its skin or long hair sticking up.
originally posted by: waverlyhills
Now that's pretty weird. Do I believe in gnomes not necessarily,but I do believe that there is strange things in the world we don't understand. I think it's interesting nonetheless and makes for interesting discussion. What is especially fascinating to me besides the picture is how quickly some people jump on here and say "Nope you're wrong..really?..how stupid...etc" I wonder if these so called experts are just poised at their computers fingers at the ready..waiting to debunk and insult to prove their so called expertise.
I know the motto of Above Top Secret is Deny Ignorance, however from reading over the past few years it almost seems to me the motto has become..Believe In Nothing.
originally posted by: Baddogma
a reply to: BigBrotherDarkness
we NEED more silliness...