It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
originally posted by: Ove38
In the 1960s we knew how to take off from the moon, but now five decades later, we don't know how to take off from the moon and mars ?
originally posted by: Masterjaden
Ok the first part is just Buzz talking about how to be a fighter pilot, you have to not think about fear, you just have to think about executing, that was the only way it was referenced in that interview...
As to the making a simulation part, there was NO indication that he was referring to a part before the actual lunar landing. He was attempting to answer their direct question at that point and the "Handler" did appear to get really nervous, swallowing and glancing away and tightening visibly when it was mentioned. especially the second time it was mentioned.
Jaden
originally posted by: sevensfakes
a reply to: Aleister
You're obviously terrible regarding your ability to read ones non-verbal communication..You should start studying it a little, will help you get layed easier as well..
originally posted by: Rob48
originally posted by: jedi_hamster
originally posted by: Rob48
We wouldn't have the technology to fake the moon landings today
what's next? lemme guess, transformers are real? because this surely looks better than apollo 11, so we couldn't fake it, right?
seriously, i don't think that the moon landings were faked. on the other hand, we're not being told everything, that's for sure. but to twist the facts and logic this way just to support the status quo - epic fail.
Show me a space scientist who would be fooled by Transformers footage.
Remember, it wouldn't just have to look convincing to a layman. It would have to match IN EVERY DETAIL the claimed landing site and stand up to scrutiny for eternity. I'm telling you it couldn't be done even today. Not a hope.
originally posted by: ParasuvO
a reply to: OccamsRazor04
So it should take 10 times longer to do a redo ?? 50 times ??
Let us know when Space-X gets out of Earth Orbit, we cannot wait.
originally posted by: SayonaraJupiter Even at the end, Buzz is talking about 'careful what you say' ... 'wink, wink'.
originally posted by: ParasuvO
WTF are you trying to say that someone could match the absolute NOTHINGNESS of the pics from the original moon landings better than something with actual art, design, measurements, and stars in the sky ?
Fact is, you and MANY others are as lost into believing everything you are told on this, as every single other meaningless adventure that is , was, and ALWAYS WILL BE totally controlled, and held beyond YOUR control.
originally posted by: ParasuvO
a reply to: OccamsRazor04
So it should take 10 times longer to do a redo ?? 50 times ??
Let us know when Space-X gets out of Earth Orbit, we cannot wait.
originally posted by: ParasuvO
originally posted by: Rob48
originally posted by: jedi_hamster
originally posted by: Rob48
We wouldn't have the technology to fake the moon landings today
what's next? lemme guess, transformers are real? because this surely looks better than apollo 11, so we couldn't fake it, right?
seriously, i don't think that the moon landings were faked. on the other hand, we're not being told everything, that's for sure. but to twist the facts and logic this way just to support the status quo - epic fail.
Show me a space scientist who would be fooled by Transformers footage.
Remember, it wouldn't just have to look convincing to a layman. It would have to match IN EVERY DETAIL the claimed landing site and stand up to scrutiny for eternity. I'm telling you it couldn't be done even today. Not a hope.
WTF are you trying to say that someone could match the absolute NOTHINGNESS of the pics from the original moon landings better than something with actual art, design, measurements, and stars in the sky ?
I bet those pesky stars would be the reasons they and you would cite as FAKE.
Fact is, you and MANY others are as lost into believing everything you are told on this, as every single other meaningless adventure that is , was, and ALWAYS WILL BE totally controlled, and held beyond YOUR control.
LOL @ the radio operators who "listened in" wow, that seals everything!!
This kind of logic you use , the incredulous ridiculous hatred, and seething contempt shows clearly an inner desire , a terrible wish that YOU could actually prove it true, but no, you cannot, so just like ANY religion, sell your soul , and stick to it, for sure you will find out EVERYTHING WON'T YOU !!!
originally posted by: Ove38
By 2069 everyone will know Apollo 11 was a 1969 joke
originally posted by: ParasuvO
...Fact is, you and MANY others are as lost into believing everything you are told on this, as every single other meaningless adventure that is , was, and ALWAYS WILL BE totally controlled, and held beyond YOUR control...
originally posted by: JohnPhoenix
originally posted by: douglas5
I once asked MR Aldrin 35 years ago could he explain the HOT/COLD on the moon 2 astro-noughts were on the moon when it changed from night to day /hot to cold minus -287 to plus 450 in a second how the suits and visors had handled it .
He looked at me thought for a second then walked out of the hall we were in and went and sat in a car [ true story ] never did get to figuring that out but i do hear the people that are doing a engine for a scramjet are working on the same problem that N.A.S.A figured out so long ago
Woah.. really.. I never thought of that. I have heard all sorts of moon hoax claims and debunks but never that one. Best one I liked so far was the idea of them not being able to cross the Van Allen belt. depending on who you talk to it's still too dangerous to cross now.. not sure what the truth is.
But your right..
The temperature on the Moon varies from -387 Fahrenheit (-233 Celsius), at night, to 253 Fahrenheit (123 Celsius) during the day. (source google)
originally posted by: JohnPhoenix
Woah.. really.. I never thought of that. I have heard all sorts of moon hoax claims and debunks but never that one. Best one I liked so far was the idea of them not being able to cross the Van Allen belt. depending on who you talk to it's still too dangerous to cross now.. not sure what the truth is.
"The recent Fox TV show, which I saw, is an ingenious and entertaining assemblage of nonsense. The claim that radiation exposure during the Apollo missions would have been fatal to the astronauts is only one example of such nonsense."
originally posted by: AutumnWitch657
What make you think those things took a second? He probably walked away because it's a stupid question and he obviously knew from that question that you were one of those people who thought we never went to the moon. I would have walked away from you too. You don't approach one of America's hero's and insult him like that. It's just plain low class.
reply to: douglas5