Strange formation on the moon?

Hiy

I was looking at this image LEMC-2 on the lpi website and found this rock formation, check it out.

www.lpi.usra.edu...
300dpi JPEG image ( 11MB )







Doesn't it look strange?

Okay, that's not normal and I would never ever accept someone trying to pass it off as an image artifact, blur, "mosaic picture intersection lines", dust, hair, the astronaut's saliva formed into a tiny dot. No, just no. That is something.

S + F this deserves an extraordinarily Close look.

a reply to: Yeahkeepwatchingme

The image this come from has better formations then this. But this one stands out.

Looks like an alien species of Chihuahua has landed...

a reply to: jamie6737

Ah good ole geometry, she never lie.

a reply to: iamhobo

How did I not see that?! That's fantastic!

Photos like this remind me that answers to questions about humankind's past might actually be found on other worlds.

Awesome find,btw.

a reply to: jamie6737

Cool thread, I see an almost sphynx like shape inside the geometrical pattern of possible wall's forming a unequal but symetrical hexagon within a circular feature that is flat at what I interpret as the rear of the sphynx like form so though beautifully circular elsewhere it is nice and flat there.
I am a firm believe in ancient ruin's up on the lunar surface anyway and think you have something of a bomb shell here, wait for the later and more easily tampered image's to be used later in the post to try to discredit it, these older images are the best and most reliable when the air brush monkey's have missed something.
S+F

You know the more I look at it the more like a kind of weapon on a rotating platform it look's.

a reply to: jamie6737

I believe you but I'm waiting for people to come on here and go "No, can't possibly exist, we would've been informed about it."

Of course I'm certain by now somebody somewhere is gathering bunk evidence to back up their claim that it's part of some landing module, or Neil Armstrong's custom pizza container.

Is anyone's browser crashing when clicking the link? Crashed 4 times now

a reply to: Yeahkeepwatchingme

Look at this one from the same image

a reply to: FlySolo

Works fine for me

strange? yes.
it looks man-made to me

a reply to: blacktie

It is.

a reply to: jamie6737

From Google Moon, the same area.

View Apollo Image AS15-M-0792.



Check it out for yourself, you can zoom in closer than this. Odd, but nothing particularly remarkable, IMO.

Kind Regards
Myselfaswell

There is no denying it. That was made with intelligence and I don't mean in the creationism sense.

What year were these taken? Area? Do other photographs of the area in question exist that were taken from other angles, cameras, objects. Does the shading match in the other ones? Do the formations still appear even from other angles?

I know that's a lot to answer but I'm seriously curious because we always see how other angles "debunk" them so I figured I'd ask the pertinent questions all at once?

Also, any countries recently on the moon, any focus in that area? Maybe the Russians or Japanese landing probes and always doing flybys or "work" aroudn there? I know flybys could be coincidental and explained as using the right approach angle to land or orbit safely.

Star and flag...

Have no clue whether its manufactured or natural... but its interesting enough, Nice find.

a reply to: jamie6737

It may be worthwhile to see if you can find the same formation in other, higher-resolution, images of the moon. Though interesting, the resolution of the image is not sufficient to permit more detailed analysis, one thing we do have to look out for is Pareidolia and myriad of logical fallacies and unwarranted reasoning. Distinguishing between features that may be artificial from natural features is not always easy, so what is needed is some agreed upon criteria that will allow us to state with some certainty that a certain structure maybe artificial. You may wish to read up on Remote sensing and Photometry to see what are the criteria for distinguishing between an artificial and natural formation.

If this is genuine and not some sort of misinterpretation it's a nice find. Very nice.

Just from the geometry involved you can tell it needs investigation. Wonder if anyone will look further into this.

From LRO:



Zoom:



Just slopes