WTC Built For Destruction By Rockefeller Brothers, And It all Went Horribly Wrong

The towers were called David and Nelson because they had them built. www.pbs.org...

The pbs link tells us the idea was first proposed in 1946. It was an Operation Paperclip idea. Build explosives into the building. Ensure representatives from many nations are in situ every working day. When the day of destruction comes, mass outrage, mass conditioning, police the world. It didn't work. Both towers failed to detonate in the initial events necessitating the use of a flimsy back-up plan, that's why we see the absurd excuse. "Jet fuel done it! And carpets! And the contents of the litter bin!" Yeah, sure.

It was meant to be, one event, tower down in ten seconds, photographers rush to the scene. Second event, tower down in ten seconds, photographers get a few blurry shots then throw themselves under the overhangs provided by surrounding buildings. That's why the plaza was kept open against the architects wishes. 30-40 thousand dead and very little evidence was the intent. Instead we got all the evidence we need to call foul play.

The alternative was to be two truck bombs detonating the explosives in the panels from below. 13 second fall. Towers appearing to crush themselves to dust as they fell when in fact it was the panels exploding in sequence. We saw the truck bomb fail. Anyone see the second truck drive off after the failure of the first one? I bet someone saw it.

David was complaining about the failure to carry out the plan in 94. "This present window of opportunity, during which a truly peaceful and interdependent world order might be built, will not be open for too long... We are on the verge of a global transformation. All we need is the right major crisis, and the nations will accept the New World Order." - David Rockefeller speaking at the United Nations Ambassadors' dinner. [Sept. 23, 1994]

It was long overdue then and the explosives were degrading, hence the addition of several other destructive technologies, used by the squealing traitors to split the so-called Truth Movement into a fight between different theories.

When the plan was finally carried out it all went horribly wrong. Think of the expression on Bush's face when Andy Card whispered in his ear. He was just a small bit player but he had to know something about it. That expression is the look of a man who's just been told, "The second one didn't detonate either, sir, we're doomed."

They would have liked to leave them standing for the hundred plus years the designers claimed they'd last. But the corrosion issue meant cladding and windows would detach in a severe storm. The cost of replacing the panels and windows was prohibitive. Likewise the cost of demolition, covered here. www.abovetopsecret.com... The original plan had to be tried, and it failed.

The towers were destroyed mainly by the explosives built into the reinforced concrete infill panels in the core walls. You can see the panels blowing out in the photographs of the first few seconds. Of course other methods were also employed, I'm not arguing with evidence.

I've covered the concrete panels. www.abovetopsecret.com...

We have to be suspicious of the Sears Tower. cotocrew.wordpress.com... And the United Nations building. freepeopleontheland.wordpress.com... "John Jr. donated 18 acres of land, which formerly contained a slaughterhouse, to the United Nations located in New York, as well as the land for Rockefeller Center." Any prominent building associated with these criminals may have explosives hidden in building materials at the time of construction. They won't have put all their eggs in one basket. If they'd got away with the WTC they would have most likely run a string of 'terrorist' attacks.

Rockefeller Creed. "...only in the purifying fire of sacrifice..."

Bold thread - I haven't read all the associated material, and I'm sick of the constant back and forth between deniers and claimants; however, something was long awry, and it is my firm belief that ultimately, history will reveal the true tale - but not until corruption is uprooted and cast out from civilisation. Ergo, we're in for a long wait.

a reply to: FlyInTheOintment

The back and forth is the distraction. That's why I suggest digging up the debris on the Fresh Kills landfill. First the 'fines', thought to contain the missing human remains, need to be appropriately located in a remembrance garden. As was originally promised to the families before the fines were suddenly bulldozed over the landfill. Then the rest of what's there has to be treated as evidence, not sorted through looking for evidence. The average particle size indicates extraordinary demolition. It was all thoroughly documented at the time. The physical evidence is there awaiting examination.

Searching 'WTC Families For Proper Burial' gets you some of the information on this subject, but most coverage is horribly distorted. The debris in question covered an area of around one acre. It could have been moved to a respectful site. It was buried instead on the landfill. Concealing evidence. Then we hear all the fake outrage about families feelings. Their feelings would be best respected by dealing appropriately with the issue of the 'fines'.

"It's a pretty formidable place," Diane Horning told me as we looked across nearly 2,200 acres of prettied-up garbage dump, approximately 40 acres of which holds refuse from the World Trade Center. "You can't bring the elderly. You can't bring young children. There's no place to put flowers."

a reply to: Kester

Well, at least your story is original. No need for sources, just pure imagination. Incidentally, the Sears Tower is now called the Willis Tower. I wonder if Willis knows what he bought?

originally posted by: DJW001
I wonder if Willis knows what he bought?

Watchu talkin bout DJ?

a reply to: Kester

I watched someone waving a beautiful scarf from one of the towers and then it just suddenly imploded. It was one of the most frustrating because I could nothing and saddest days of my life.

I think its time to make the rockefellers pay for what they did even if they are dead and to taked their assets and distribute them to the people whose lives have been affected by their disgusting act.

Its time this war by Jewish oligarchs was spoken openly about and their desire to run the world and produce a new world order with them in charge, totally unelected, and presumably the goyim to be their slaves? Just how do they think a new world order would actually change things. Things improve when prosperity, trade, education and hopes for an ever brighter future are in play - but I doubt these are the things the Oligarchs have in mind in their megalomaniac dreams.


To carry out such an evil plan shows no conscience, compassion or even humanity and to stand up and talk about it is beyond comprehension.

What exactly are you saying was supposed to happen that would have brought down the towers in 10 seconds ? Planes hitting and then an immediate detonation ? If so why were the planes needed ? and then there would have been the question of who placed the explosives because to get a perfect demolition as we saw implies months of planning and extensive explosives in all the correct places.

I think what we saw was what was intended,we know from basic physics that the "pancake effect" is impossible as the smaller top section of the building does not have the energy to destroy the larger undamaged section so this implies that we saw a controlled demolition ,the planes were allowed to fly into the buildings (I'm not quite prepared to believe the US government ordered the hijacking,they just let it go ahead) as a catalyst for the demolition,I'm just not sure how the explosives could have been rigged without arousing suspicion,it's telling that both buildings took roughly the same amount of time to collapse ,what are the chances of that ?

speak to wit that you own. even though it is obvious by now. look what I mean is that people have died for speaking out.

a reply to: Kester

I did read it, toward the "Rockefellers planned in 1946" idea, and then I just wen ... oh God, give me a break.

a reply to: bjarneorn this has being going on since before Ww1. The fourth Reich is rising now but this time its the Muslims that are the focus. All quida and ISIS were funded by the US. Al q to topple Saddam and ISIS to topple Assad. This is a ploy to get the Americans to view all middle eastern people as enemies. Hitler convinced the German people Jews were enemies too. This time it is made out to be Muslims killing other Muslims. Its actually quite clever. Let the extremists take over then the moderate Muslims are lumped in with the extremists, then genocide is acceptable for the masses. So why did USA go into Afghanistan? Poppies.

the twin towers were meant to be massive Phallic Symbols dedicated to the two founders of the NWO...the Rockefeller Bros

here is a background page dealing with Nelson who was appointed the VP by Gerald Ford...
the twin towers were new & shiny back then...lead paint & asbestos were no strangers to these monuments

www.reformation.org...

a reply to: St Udio the twin towers were the equivalent of the Reichstag (a national symbol in Germany) being burnt down by polish terrorists. Poland got invaded and hundreds of thousands of people died. What was the outcome of the Iraq war?

originally posted by: arrakis624
a reply to: St Udio the twin towers were the equivalent of the Reichstag (a national symbol in Germany) being burnt down by polish terrorists. Poland got invaded and hundreds of thousands of people died. What was the outcome of the Iraq war?

No, the Reichstag was allegedly burned down by German Communists.

Btw, the rockerfellers were just as powerfull in the early 1900's as they are now. Its a 1000 year plan/reich. The bush family can tell you all about it. a reply to: arrakis624

Of polish descent. a reply to: DJW001

originally posted by: arrakis624
Btw, the rockerfellers were just as powerfull in the early 1900's as they are now.

Really? They are not even among the board of directors or major stockholders for the legacy companies started by John D. Rockefeller, Exxon and Mobil.

originally posted by: arrakis624
Of polish descent. a reply to: DJW001

No. The alleged arsonist caught on the scene was Dutch. Later, three Bulgarians were tried. Hitler never did invade Bulgaria:

en.wikipedia.org...

On August 22, 1939, just before the invasion of Poland, Hitler gave explicit permission to his commanders to kill "without pity or mercy, all men, women, and children of Polish descent or language."[12][13]

Genocide was to be conducted systematically against Polish people: on September 7, 1939 Reinhard Heydrich stated that all Polish nobles, clergy and Jews are to be killed. On September 12, Wilhelm Keitel added the intelligentsia to the list. On March 15, 1940 Himmler stated: "All Polish specialists will be exploited in our military-industrial complex. Later, all Poles will disappear from this world. It is imperative that the great German nation considers the elimination of all Polish people as its chief task." At the end of 1940, Hitler confirmed his pronouncement demanding liquidation of "all leading elements in Poland".[14]

Sorryy , a lot was bandied about in the media just as it is today.
a reply to: arrakis624

And wiki has been around for 10's of years. a reply to: DJW001