It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
originally posted by: CRUSTY37
sure here you gowww.thedailysheeple.com...
He is hearing talk inside DHS that thousands of Sp….N…Z boys from that place connected to Alaska have been infiltrating from Canada into USA throughout this summer. He estimated the number so far exceeds 20,000 commandos. -
originally posted by: bbracken677
a reply to: CRUSTY37
Correct me if I am wrong, but it is unconstitutional for the US Military to do what is discussed in the OP, no?
who friggin cares whos fault it was!!!
originally posted by: marg6043
a reply to: Aloysius the Gaul
On this one I have to say that it is Bush fault, I guess he knew that was coming in the near future.
originally posted by: marg6043
a reply to: bbracken677
I believe that Bush changed that in some extent.
George Bush struck down Posse Comitatus, thus making it legal for military to patrol the U.S. He has also legally established that in the “War on Terror,” the U.S. is at war around the globe and thus the whole world is a battlefield. Thus the U.S. is also a battlefield.
He also led change to the 1807 Insurrection Act to give him far broader powers in the event of a loosely defined “insurrection” or many other “conditions” he has the power to identify. The Constitution allows the suspension of habeas corpus — habeas corpus prevents us from being seized by the state and held without trial — in the event of an “insurrection.” With his own army force now, his power to call a group of protesters or angry voters “insurgents” staging an “insurrection” is strengthened
www.chelseagreen.com...
Title 18 U.S. Code, Section 831, provides that if nuclear material is involved in an emergency, the Secretary of Defense may provide assistance to the Department of Justice, notwithstanding the Posse Comitatus Act.
Title 10 U.S. Code, Chapter 18, authorizes military support for civilian law enforcement agencies for counterdrug operations and in emergencies involving chemical or biological weapons of mass destruction. The Secretary of Defense may provide information, allow the use of military equipment and facilities, train law enforcement officials in the operation and maintenance of military equipment, and maintain such equipment. Support for law enforcement agencies may not impair military readiness, and military personnel shall not participate in searches, seizures, arrests, or similar activities unless such participation is otherwise authorized by law. (Military police personnel, for example, may enforce the law within their jurisdictions.)
originally posted by: Aloysius the Gaul
a reply to: marg6043
Careful - you're not allowed to blame Bush for anything on here - it's all Obama's fault.....didn't you get the memo??
none taken, I was just trying to show how Obama gave Interpol higher authority over our own law inforcement. Why would that happen?
originally posted by: bbracken677
a reply to: CRUSTY37
No offense, but Interpol is international police...not military. They only have rights in countries that grant them those rights.
again, just trying to post the info. You guys are something else
originally posted by: HomerinNC
a reply to: CRUSTY37
The appearance of the document amidst growing unrest in Ferguson, Missouri, with the National Guard now being called in to deal with the disorder, is an ominous coincidence.
This is straight out fear mongering. Stop spreading doom porn.
thank you! I just read some info on this as well.
originally posted by: bbracken677
originally posted by: marg6043
a reply to: bbracken677
I believe that Bush changed that in some extent.
George Bush struck down Posse Comitatus, thus making it legal for military to patrol the U.S. He has also legally established that in the “War on Terror,” the U.S. is at war around the globe and thus the whole world is a battlefield. Thus the U.S. is also a battlefield.
He also led change to the 1807 Insurrection Act to give him far broader powers in the event of a loosely defined “insurrection” or many other “conditions” he has the power to identify. The Constitution allows the suspension of habeas corpus — habeas corpus prevents us from being seized by the state and held without trial — in the event of an “insurrection.” With his own army force now, his power to call a group of protesters or angry voters “insurgents” staging an “insurrection” is strengthened
www.chelseagreen.com...
No offense, but that is a load of crap. I just did my own research to see if that was true, and I only chose links that were legit.. not some tinfoil hat owned websites.
The law stands as it has for years with a couple of exceptions:
Title 18 U.S. Code, Section 831, provides that if nuclear material is involved in an emergency, the Secretary of Defense may provide assistance to the Department of Justice, notwithstanding the Posse Comitatus Act.
Title 10 U.S. Code, Chapter 18, authorizes military support for civilian law enforcement agencies for counterdrug operations and in emergencies involving chemical or biological weapons of mass destruction. The Secretary of Defense may provide information, allow the use of military equipment and facilities, train law enforcement officials in the operation and maintenance of military equipment, and maintain such equipment. Support for law enforcement agencies may not impair military readiness, and military personnel shall not participate in searches, seizures, arrests, or similar activities unless such participation is otherwise authorized by law. (Military police personnel, for example, may enforce the law within their jurisdictions.)
Posse Com.
There you will find some history and relevance. Not agenda driven drivel. If I am wrong, I will apologize, but the link provided was obviously agenda driven. Kool Aid.
originally posted by: HomerinNC
a reply to: CRUSTY37
The appearance of the document amidst growing unrest in Ferguson, Missouri, with the National Guard now being called in to deal with the disorder, is an ominous coincidence.
This is straight out fear mongering. Stop spreading doom porn.
originally posted by: CRUSTY37
originally posted by: LDragonFire
a reply to: whywhynot
To be fair other than last night infowars has been on the ground covering this whole mess when main stream media are safe behind yellow tape in there press pin happily reporting as fact anything said by the authorities....
When fox and cnn were reporting only smoke was being used infowars guys were soaked in tear gas.
Those poor guys have hit with rubber bullets and tear gas for 2 weeks now! Say what you will about Infowars but I dont see any other media outlet willing to take this kind of abuse for a story and come back the next day to do it all over again.