The SINGLE MOST IMPORTANT ANALYSIS of the events of 9/11.

The SINGLE MOST IMPORTANT ANALYSIS of the events of 9/11.

A report by E. P. Heidner dated 2010/09/01.
He was a former employee of the DIA branch of the Office of Naval Intelligence (ONI).

The brand new ONI offices in the newly renovated Pentagon wing were totally destroyed in the flight 77 attack on 9/11.....
Only one young survivor from ONI, who was sent away a few moments before the plane impact, as a courier. Ask him what message and to whom, he was carrying....He is still alive. See my first thread at ATS in 2005, for his name.
Search also in one of my first posts here, for a file called "Project Hammer", from an English writer, David G. Guyatt.

Wikispooks comment :

This report is probably the single most important analysis of the events of 9/11 that Wikispooks has seen.
It is an in-depth analysis of US/UK post-WWII covert operations and criminal banking activities originating with hidden 'Yamasjita' and NAZI gold; it demonstrates Western complicity in the 1991 Moscow coup which heralded the collapse of the Soviet Union and shows that the fraudulent instruments used to finance these events and the subsequent looting of Soviet industry, were at the heart of the 9/11 attacks.

The gold looted during fifty years of expansion by the Japanese armies in China and the other South East Asian occupied countries, was hidden by general Yamasjita in the Philippines in caves and buried deep in the earth at multiple sites. Where it was found just after Japan capitulated by some quite well known persons, who became important players in the spooks and banking communities from the last 5 decades after WW II.
Every US president and all the top Army brass from after that war, knew about that illegal treasure worth trillions of dollars, and used it to finance political incorrect moves, and incorrect wars.

Collateral Damage - part 1 :
wikispooks.com...:Collateral_Damage_-_part_1.pdf

Click the blue pdf-link in this link, to read the ORIGINAL FILE with Adobe Reader :
wikispooks.com...

The WikiSpooks page-file :
wikispooks.com...:Collateral_Damage_911


-- Collateral Damage (Part 2).
The Sub-prime Crisis and the Terrorist Attacks on September 11, 2001 :
wikispooks.com...

How 9/11 buried "the biggest financial crimes in history". An analysis of the highly complex web of US/UK covert operations and criminal banking activities going back to WW2, suggesting Western complicity in the collapse of the Soviet Union and the subsequent looting of Soviet industry. The ostensible settlement/roll-over for these instruments were dated through September 2001 and would have clinched several high-level criminal investigations had they been allowed to settle normally.

A report by E. P. Heidner dated 2010/09/01 :
wikispooks.com...:Collateral_Damage_911

-- Fifty Years of the Deep State.
A book by Mark Gorton dated 2013-11-22.
A remarkable summary of the deep state which names names - the most prominent being that of George H.W. Bush, whom Gorton identifies as the mastermind behind the 9/11 plot.

And that's thus the reason they "LOST (track)" of those 2.3 TRILLION dollars as announced by Donald Rumsfeld at the Pentagon, on the day before 9/11/2001.

They didn't loose it, it was never approved by the US Congress to begin with....
It was all that black money used to finance all the black operations from the CIA and other Agencies and the US Army, Air Force and Navy their black projects.

That's why they could not find such huge sums.
They, being the honest researchers.
They found materials and invoices spend on something, but nothing "material" it was used for. And partially lost in those black ops, unreported officially, of course.

I have heard about the gold located in the Far East at the end of WW2 but could not find much information on it , And all the gold missing from the vaults of the tower's

a reply to: LaBTop

And it only took over two years to get rid of the evidence of the 2.3 trillion? Is that what you are trying to say? OR have you failed to adequately research the reality of the 2.3 trillion?

a reply to: douglas5
www.nytimes.com...

All of the gold and silver was recovered from its vaults. Too many people got 9/11 confused with Die Hard With a Vengance.

originally posted by: cardinalfan0596
a reply to: douglas5
www.nytimes.com...

All of the gold and silver was recovered from its vaults. Too many people got 9/11 confused with Die Hard With a Vengance.

The fate of nearly $1 billion worth of gold, silver and other precious metals stored beneath the WTC before 9-11 continues to baffle many.

To this day, only $230 million has officially been accounted for. All of that was retrieved from the previously mentioned, two-level, 6,000-square-foot vault maintained by the Bank of Nova Scotia. They reportedly lost $200 million in gold as a result of the attacks. However, other estimates suggest there was an additional $750-million worth of precious metals that may have been stored in other vaults or hurriedly evacuated from the Nova Scotia vault before the skyscrapers came down.
911justicehalifax.wordpress.com...

suppose it is who you read

a reply to: douglas5

you don't LOSE gold by fire or building collapse....you LOSE gold by someone taking it

originally posted by: jimmyx
a reply to: douglas5

you don't LOSE gold by fire or building collapse....you LOSE gold by someone taking it

And then, there was the gold: $166,770,000,000 worth of gold bullion that went missing from where it was being stored in the basement of the WTC complex, with only $230 million of it recovered, all of that having been stored in Building 4 and found in an abandoned truck, accompanied by an escort of several abandoned cars, which were found in a delivery ramp under Building 5 - apparently, attempting to escape, at a time when not even the firemen knew the skyscrapers were going to collapse. This recovery of a potential gold heist attempt is described chillingly by a rescue worker who feared he'd be shot at the scene.

www.activistpost.com...#!bFfKzw

originally posted by: LaBTop
And that's thus the reason they "LOST (track)" of those 2.3 TRILLION dollars as announced by Donald Rumsfeld at the Pentagon, on the day before 9/11/2001.

It was announced well before 9/11...

That's why they could not find such huge sums.

They have found it....

This is why 9/11 "research" is getting nowhere, the same tired old lies and silly stories that have been debunked many times here before keep being bought up by truthers.

originally posted by: hellobruce

originally posted by: LaBTop
And that's thus the reason they "LOST (track)" of those 2.3 TRILLION dollars as announced by Donald Rumsfeld at the Pentagon, on the day before 9/11/2001.

It was announced well before 9/11...

That's why they could not find such huge sums.

They have found it....

This is why 9/11 "research" is getting nowhere, the same tired old lies and silly stories that have been debunked many times here before keep being bought up by truthers.

Source.

I doubt that he already read my ORIGINAL FILE, linked to article.

Let's see what the skeptics think about f.ex., this



Note carefully the date, 14th November 1963.....

a reply to: LaBTop

If you cannot see the two obvious flaws in that photo, then you are beyond hope. Everyone else, check out the other pages here:

thrillerauthor.blogspot.com...

See you can find the flaws on the other pages as well.

a reply to: yourmaker

Here you go:
www.defense.gov...

In fiscal 1999, a defense audit found that about $2.3 trillion of balances, transactions and adjustments were inadequately documented. These "unsupported" transactions do not mean the department ultimately cannot account for them, she advised, but that tracking down needed documents would take a long time. Auditors, she said, might have to go to different computer systems, to different locations or access different databases to get information.

Well now, I guess 1999 is earlier than 2001 eh?

originally posted by: cardinalfan0596
a reply to: douglas5
www.nytimes.com...

All of the gold and silver was recovered from its vaults. Too many people got 9/11 confused with Die Hard With a Vengance.

Yep, Die Hard WAV circa1995, so many cues about something that had yet to happen...oops, nearly forgot to add,

(Edit successful second time around after being taken off line)

a reply to: yourmaker

Here is Rumsfeld's speech on 9/10/01
www.defense.gov...

Applicable paragraphs
"The technology revolution has transformed organizations across the private sector, but not ours, not fully, not yet. We are, as they say, tangled in our anchor chain. Our financial systems are decades old. According to some estimates, we cannot track $2.3 trillion in transactions. We cannot share information from floor to floor in this building because it's stored on dozens of technological systems that are inaccessible or incompatible.

We maintain 20 to 25 percent more base infrastructure than we need to support our forces, at an annual waste to taxpayers of some $3 billion to $4 billion. Fully half of our resources go to infrastructure and overhead, and in addition to draining resources from warfighting, these costly and outdated systems, procedures and programs stifle innovation as well. A new idea must often survive the gauntlet of some 17 levels of bureaucracy to make it from a line officer's to my desk. I have too much respect for a line officer to believe that we need 17 layers between us."

Rumsfeld, is speaking of Pentagon inefficiency.

Reported by AP on March 3, 2000 (before Rumsfeld was SecDef..
hv.greenspun.com...

Excerpt from Rumsfeld Confirmation hearing Jan 11, 2001 as posted by PBS

www.pbs.org...

"SEN. ROBERT BYRD: How can we seriously consider a $50 billion increase in the defense budget when DOD’s own auditors, when DOD’s own auditors say that the Department cannot account for $2.3 trillion in transactions in one year alone? My question to you, Mr. Secretary, is what do you plan to do about this?

DONALD RUMSFELD: Decline the nomination. (Laughter)

KWAME HOLMAN: Rumsfeld did admit the problem could take a number of years to sort out. Meanwhile, the full Senate is scheduled to meet within hours of George W. Bush’s swearing-in on January 20. Donald Rumsfeld will be among several cabinet nominees expected to receive overwhelming Senate approval at that time."

Discussed by PBS, February 12, 2001
www.pbs.org...

It was far from a secret. It had been public knowledge long before 9/11/01, and it had NOTHING to do with the event of 9/11/01 or any super duper top secret gold transaction with John Kennedy.

a reply to: smurfy

Now Bruce Willis is in on it? Wow........

a reply to: douglas5

And Loose Change ends up being the source.......yep.

Care to explain how 3,000 metric tons of gold was moved with no one noticing the 1,000 dump trucks needed?

originally posted by: cardinalfan0596
a reply to: douglas5

And Loose Change ends up being the source.......yep.

Care to explain how 3,000 metric tons of gold was moved with no one noticing the 1,000 dump trucks needed?

IF i knew the answer to that i would be working for the goverment

a reply to: douglas5

And that is why "truthers" are not taken seriously. They cannot apply common sense to their theories and discover why their theories are wrong.

originally posted by: cardinalfan0596
a reply to: douglas5

And that is why "truthers" are not taken seriously. They cannot apply common sense to their theories and discover why their theories are wrong.

“The gold, which was discovered . . . was being transported through the basement of the building on the morning of Sept. 11,” reads the article. “Recovery workers reached a service tunnel and discovered a 10-wheel [truck] and a number of cars [that] had been crushed by falling steel.”

Another article appearing in the Daily News around that same time corroborates this story:

“Sources said the gold was found in a delivery tunnel under 5 World Trade Center.”

Was the uncovered 10-wheel truck the last in a fleet of gold-laden rigs with an armed security escort? Did personnel decide to abandon these vehicles and flee on foot as they heard the structure above them giving way?