It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
originally posted by: Deege
You are correct sir, I feel everyone can make a difference. I try to avoid any corp that does business or supports Israel. Choose Pepsi over Coke, Toshiba over HP, AMD over Intel, it's easy and fun.a reply to: CommandoJoe
Strauss and PepsiCo have worked in collaboration for over 20 years.
The partnership began in 1990 with PepsiCo Frito-Lay in the salty snacks operation, when Strauss Group (then Elite Industries Ltd.) teamed up with the American multinational Food & Beverage corporation through its subsidiary, PepsiCo Investments Europe (I) B.V. (“PepsiCo Europe”) and subsequently established the salty snack production site in Sderot, Israel.
originally posted by: Deege
You are correct sir, I feel everyone can make a difference. I try to avoid any corp that does business or supports Israel. Choose Pepsi over Coke, Toshiba over HP, AMD over Intel, it's easy and fun.a reply to: CommandoJoe
originally posted by: hellobruce
originally posted by: GogoVicMorrow
Israel made the first move.
funny how you ignore the thousands of missiles launched by Hamas terrorists for years at Israel.... why do you ignore them?
en.wikipedia.org...
originally posted by: buster2010
a reply to: CommandoJoe
Palestine is not a country, never was a country, and Israel has not maintained a presence in Gaza since 2005...
Palestine is a country and is recognized by the UN as a country and has observer state status. Also it looks like Israeli propaganda 101 forgot that Gaza is part of Palestine and the West Bank which shares a unity government with Gaza is occupied. Also the blockade against Gaza is collective punishment.
originally posted by: CommandoJoe
originally posted by: Deege
You are correct sir, I feel everyone can make a difference. I try to avoid any corp that does business or supports Israel. Choose Pepsi over Coke, Toshiba over HP, AMD over Intel, it's easy and fun.a reply to: CommandoJoe
You should try harder then:
Toshiba Israel
Ever use Google?
How about Windows or Microsoft products?
Oops, looks like Pepsi is off the table too. FYI - while Coke is the dominate brand in Israel, Pepsi is available pretty much everywhere...
Strauss and PepsiCo have worked in collaboration for over 20 years.
The partnership began in 1990 with PepsiCo Frito-Lay in the salty snacks operation, when Strauss Group (then Elite Industries Ltd.) teamed up with the American multinational Food & Beverage corporation through its subsidiary, PepsiCo Investments Europe (I) B.V. (“PepsiCo Europe”) and subsequently established the salty snack production site in Sderot, Israel.
And I guess you must now divest yourself of that shiny new AMD powered Toshiba laptop...
Do you have a smart phone? Running Android? See Google above. Running Windows? See Microsoft above. Or maybe an iPhone?
It really isn't that easy - but if it makes you feel better and you're having fun, more power to you - It won't make a difference though...
Congress uses U.S. trade policy to undercut European pressure against Israeli settlements. A new U.S. bill legitimizes Israeli settlements and delegitimizes Palestinian non-violent resistance to the occupation.
...
The Trade Facilitation and Trade Enforcement Act legally authorizes the White House to negotiate and sign trade deals. An amendment in that bill now defines Washington’s principal objectives in those negotiations to include the discouragement of boycott, divestment and sanctions moves against Israel, including non-tariff barriers on Israeli goods, services or commerce.
...
The key term here is, “or in Israeli-controlled territories.” That term is specifically used in Israel to refer the Israeli presence in the West Bank, including the settlements. To put it simply, Congress is saying that as far as it is concerned, there is no difference between Tel Aviv and the West Bank settlement of Kiryat Arba.
Another point of immense importance is the inclusion along with BDS, “politically motivated non-tariff barriers.” Because the amendment specifically applies to trade talks with Europe, that wording should be understood as a response to increased efforts by the EU to ensure that its trade agreements and financial relationships with Israel do not cross the Green Line. That means labeling settlement products, limiting financial cooperation and lending to companies that operate in the settlements and the withdrawal of agricultural inspection certificates for Israeli goods produced in the West Bank.
...
BDS has successfully entered the mainstream in recent years. Whereas Israelis’ contact with the BDS was once relegated to the occasional foreign musicians refusing to perform in Tel Aviv, is now being felt in academic forums across the world, as international corporations pull out of Israeli public works projects, and major investment and religious institutions begin divesting from companies that do business with Israel.
The non-violent grassroots movement modeled on South African anti-apartheid campaigns is viewed by a threat by many in Israel. Of the movement’s three demands — an end to the occupation, full equality for Palestinian citizens of Israel, and a resolution for Palestinian refugees of 1948 — Israelis specifically cite the refugee issue as a veiled attempt to undermine Israel’s Jewish identity.
On the other hand, Palestinians and supporters of the boycott movement argue that BDS simply demands that Israel end the occupation and fully respect Palestinian rights, without prejudging any political outcome.
Up until recently consensus wisdom in Israel was that despite increasing gains and small isolated victories, the boycott is a marginal movement. By allocating significant resources to fighting it and describing BDS as a strategic threat, however, the Israeli government is now telling us that boycott might actually be more effective than previously thought.