It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
originally posted by: Aphorism
Any basic exercise can alter the human body; and anyone can and will do this without the need to involve all the mystical connotations that goes with wishful thinking.
What need do we have to assume anything? Consciousness is a completely empty term unless it is an abstract way of speaking about the human body.
[On] the meditation front you don't see it as being [physical] and so can have no effect? Am I correct?
Do you think that mental activity alone can create electro-chemical changes?
On to consciousness - do you think that consciousness is meerly a manifestation of the physical body? Do you beleive that all volition is a product of the phsycial body and has no separate substance/reality (empty term, wishful thinking - your terms)?
I want to understand how you think/believe that things happen - the body acts then the mind thinks? Is that what you are saying here? More precisely, the body experiences a perceiption and reacts to it. Am I close?
originally posted by: Aphorism
a reply to: FyreByrd
[On] the meditation front you don't see it as being [physical] and so can have no effect? Am I correct?
No—meditation is a physical activity, meaning a physical agent performs an action. Only physical systems can effect physical systems. Anything else is paradox.
originally posted by: Aphorism
a reply to: FyreByrd
That depends on what you mean by “mental activity”. If by mental activity you mean the physical act of thinking (physical because a physical agent is required to perform any activity, and any activity is really a physical object performing an action), then I would say no, as much more than what we call “mental activity” creates fundamental changes in our physical makeup and gene expression—environment for instance.
originally posted by: Beyond Creation
If I may?
Meditation is not a physical act; for it is the absence of at least consciousness of the physical.
A paradox? Probably.
I’m going to take this one step at a time. Define 'agent' for me please? And then define "physical agent"?
And how is meditation a physical activity. Is it a physical activity in the sense that a 'body' is sitting or do you consider cognition a physical activity? Are you saying that thinking is a physical activity because there is measurable electro-chemical activity in the brain during any thinking?
I guess the question is and this goes back to agency is that for something to exist has to have physical presence? Is that what your getting at. So, if that is your belief - then thinking is only (what we subjectively perceive in our heads (LOL)) the electrochemical flows in the brain and nothing more. Therefore all think has to be initiated by a physical experience?
originally posted by: FyreByrd
originally posted by: Aphorism
Any basic exercise can alter the human body; and anyone can and will do this without the need to involve all the mystical connotations that goes with wishful thinking.
What need do we have to assume anything? Consciousness is a completely empty term unless it is an abstract way of speaking about the human body.
Okay, let me try to understand your point of view.
Okay - yes any physical activity will change the electro-chemical make-up of the body for a period of time and cumulatively build up lasting change. Okay, I buy that.
One the meditation front you don't see it as being phsyical and so can have no effect? Am I correct?
Do you think that mental activity alone can create electro-chemical changes?
Today, all who espouse the “religion of intolerance” – be they saint or sinner – believer or unbeliever – Christian or Atheist – yes, all who hold to any absolute other than the National Religion, let them be marked as ignorant at their best, and dangerous at their worst. Pro-lifers, traditionalists (defining marriage only between a man and a woman), Biblicists, people of dual faith (“me and Thee”), Creationists, those who claim divine texts—especially the Bible, and in particular, the singularity of Him Who proclaimed: I am the way, the truth and the life, no one comes to the Father but through me” (John 14:6). These ignoramuses, these intolerant absolutists are at best suspect – at worst the persistent enemy of democracy and freedom. They are at best narcissistic – at worst a cancer upon our renewed image. Behind the reconciliation rhetoric of Sam Harris and his band and brand of New Atheism lies a tyranny of tolerance, spurred on as East meets West, culminating in the National Religion where illuminated within sits one enshrined, upon the throne of His temple, being God – recognized as God – and wholly subsumed as the divine discerner of good and evil, having absolute ethic embodied within the “designer God” crafted through meditation, contemplative prayer and human reason. The fullness of THE LIE has come: YOU WILL BE LIKE GOD KNOWING GOOD AND EVIL (Gen. 3:5).