Malaysian airplanes destroyed by US National Security Agency

Malaysian airplanes destroyed by US National Security Agency

September 11, 2001 made the US Administration revise the National Security views in general and air traffic in particular. Therefore passenger inspection and air route traffic control were strengthened. It is well known and beyond question.
At the same time it's become an open secret of late that after a number of terrorist attacks on civil aircraft the US special services and national aircraft industries created a system capable to detect and destroy hijacked planes. Most of Boeing airplanes have been equipped by the appropriate hardware by now. It was installed under the guise of modernization and repairing in all Boeing aircraft maintenance centers.
It's worth mentioning that all modern airplanes are equipped with an automatic control system connected to the GPS satellite navigation system. GPS devices determine the aircraft coordinates and transmit the data to the flight control services on ground.
So the airplane destruction system is based on GPS tracking. In case of aircraft hijacking the GPS special operator can transmit a coded signal to a certain airplane. If the system confirms the aircraft deviated off course for more than 5 miles the aircraft self-destruction mechanism will be activated.
We can't rule out that the United States have carried out several operational tests of these devices this year. A Malaysian Airlines Boeing 777 still could not be found, the air crash investigation of another one is at a deadlock. By the way this aircraft type used to be the most reliable in the world for a long time.
Though, it's been almost a month since the air crash in Ukraine there is still no evidence proving that Boeing 777 was shot down by a surface-to-air missile. Despite this, the US and European leaders urge that Russia and pro-Russian rebels are to blame. In the same circumstances in 2001, Russia instantly presented irrefutable evidence that Ukrainian surface-to-air missile shot down Siberia Airlines Flight 1812 over the Black Sea. I wonder why Ukraine or the US or the EU can't do the same now.
Many people in our world share the opinion that the struggle against terrorism should be intensified. So it may justify the creation of the system capable to detect aircraft course deviation. However I believe we should condemn the civil aircraft self-destruction system as illegal. Anyway, I have much less desire to get on board of such aircraft.

a reply to: drcollins

I didn't hear about mh17 being hijacked.
It would also be strange to be testing a system like you describe on the same airline.

a reply to: drcollins

Even if I wouldn't put it beyond the Americans, to do something totally nuts like this. I doubt it. First of all, it wouldn't stand up to scrutiny if other nations discovered the self destruct. To totally destroy the plane, there would have to be a whole lot of explosives on board. And it wouldn't go unnoticed.

Secondly, neither plane is a mystery. The first, probably was shot down by a joint US-Thailand training exercise, and China discovered wreckage of it, on their satellite images. It's a common assumption in China, that it was shot down by US military ... there is no other explanation, as to why the US, would allow the search to diverge away from the planes actual route to some bogus place around Australia. The Alternate possibility, for MH-370, is that it flew into a methane pocket in the air ... however, if it did, there wouldn't be a reason for the US media, to divert attention elsewhere.

The second, was shot down ... most likely by rebels, although some say by Ukraine themselves. After Ukraine diverted the plane over rebel territory, most likely in hope of the rebels shooting it down (which means, if the rebels didn't, they probably did it themselves). The goal, was to public and political pressure on Russia, so that they would have a hard time to arm the rebels. Opening up a corridor for Ukraine, to win the territory with a lightning strike. Without arms, and support, the rebels wouldn't stand a chance.

It's not really much of a mystery, at all ... everything else, is just "political" mumbo jumbo, to excuse or divert attention from the facts.

Malaysian airlines have really taken a beating. Must be horrible for business.

a reply to: bjarneorn


Still, there's no real evidence that MH370 was shot down and the aircraft wrecks not found.
Who downed MH17 is a mystery as well.
There's a lot of facts and statements that contradict each other. That's why a lot of versions appear.
Self-destruction system was really created. So it's rather possible that the United States tested the system on Malaysian aircraft.

Why does your link got to a auto blank? Could you check it please cause I would like to read the source of the claims.

a reply to: Sremmos80

That's not a link, sorry! This is an original text.

originally posted by: drcollins
a reply to: Sremmos80

That's not a link, sorry! This is an original text.

No link?

Do you have ANY evidence of the self destruct system you describe?

Are there any sources? Need some more info on this.

Ta

originally posted by: drcollins
At the same time it's become an open secret of late that after a number of terrorist attacks on civil aircraft the US special services and national aircraft industries created a system capable to detect and destroy hijacked planes.

Your source for that stupid claim is what?

It's worth mentioning that all modern airplanes are equipped with an automatic control system connected to the GPS satellite navigation system. GPS devices determine the aircraft coordinates and transmit the data to the flight control services on ground.

Your source for that claim is what exactly?

you seem to have just made claims with nothing to back them up!

I heard that some rogue rouge invisible unicorns got mad and kicked the crap out of the planes.

Just as an aside, all Rolls-Royce jet engines are constantly monitored, even while in the air, so the manufacturers know what the engine is doing, obviously, and if it needs attention, as soon as it lands, the engine gets what is required, I would think it would be easy enough for a satellite to track the airframe with a transponder.
The above information is from a TV program about how Rolls-Royce make jet-engines.

Information's spread in social networks and refers to this
carlo-moretti.blogspot.com.au...

a reply to: drcollins


Strike 2!

The link takes me to a blank page.....

I am open minded and willing to listen and read over material but I have to say I am not really feeling this one to much to be honest. I will keep checking back on this one but it seems unlikely to me at this point.

a reply to: BugOut

It works, check it again(carlo-moretti.blogspot.com.au...)

Oh this is ridiculous. Seriously? You link to a blog post, probably written by you since it is basically copy/pasted almost word for word from the blog. No evidence or supporting docs, yet the blog has Snowden referenced in it so it is supposed to be believed?

What rubbish. A self-destruct mechanism on a civilian airliner....yeah....that is going to pass. So Boeing is now building these into all aircraft....ridiculous.

a reply to: drcollins

At the same time it's become an open secret of late that after a number of terrorist attacks on civil aircraft the US special services and national aircraft industries created a system capable to detect and destroy hijacked planes. Most of Boeing airplanes have been equipped by the appropriate hardware by now. It was installed under the guise of modernization and repairing in all Boeing aircraft maintenance centers.

Please provide a link to a source for this statement. (Other than InfoWars.)

a reply to: Vasa Croe

Silly for you to think it was me to write the blog post. This info was widely spread on Facebook.
Moreover, our intelligence officials also referred to social networks proving their statements. There's nothing ridiculous about it now

originally posted by: drcollins
a reply to: Vasa Croe

Silly for you to think it was me to write the blog post. This info was widely spread on Facebook.
Moreover, our intelligence officials also referred to social networks proving their statements. There's nothing ridiculous about it now

Social networks are used for spreading propaganda and disinformation. That's why intelligence agencies want you to believe what they themselves post there.

a reply to: drcollins

So where is the real evidence anything like this exists?

originally posted by: drcollins
a reply to: Vasa Croe

Silly for you to think it was me to write the blog post. This info was widely spread on Facebook.
Moreover, our intelligence officials also referred to social networks proving their statements. There's nothing ridiculous about it now

So personal blogs and Facebook are what you are using for sources? I could make up a rumor and widely spread it on Facebook, as well as write a blog about that rumor.....does that make it true?

This is almost as good as those that post a youtube videos as a source.....