It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
originally posted by: BiffTurkenton
LOL, so the creation debate raises an interesting philosophical argument: If God planted dinosaur bones in the earth and made starlight look like it was coming from light-years away to trick us into thinking the earth was much older than it says in the bible as a way to test out faith, and we fall for it, does that mean we burn in hell for being tricked by God? Or, if we don't fall for these tricks, does that mean God is an incompetent trickster? God is supposed to be infallible right? So if he plants fake million-year old dinosaur bones in the earth and makes stars look like they're trillions of miles away, then we pretty much have to fall for it and be condemned to hell. That's effed up man.
originally posted by: hydeman11
a reply to: Deaf Alien
Howdy,
Ah, I see. Well, as a rebuttal, that is perhaps one of the poorer of the choices. I've always favored the "made with age" rebuttal, to be honest. It doesn't have to break any known laws of physics, and it's relatively unfalsifiable. A win-win for most people. (Of course, I don't subscribe to that belief system...) You make a fair point that "they" have rebuttals, though, so I can't argue with that.
Regards,
Hydeman
originally posted by: OccamsRazor04
originally posted by: stormbringer1701
oy. just read Genesis in Hebrew and with a good concordance and the young earth theory is destroyed by a single word; which is mistranslated in the English version. you cannot really be a fundamentalist if you cannot read the fundamentals properly in the first place. The Bible does not say the earth is any specific age and supports a vast geological age easier than a young age once you take that mistranslated word into account and correlate it to verses elsewhere in the bible such as in Isaiah and 2nd Peter; etc.
Which word? What verse?
Jer4:22 For my people is foolish, they have not known me; they are sottish children, and they have none understanding: they are wise to do evil, but to do good they have no knowledge.
Jer4:23 I beheld the earth, and, lo, it was without form, and void; and the heavens, and they had no light.
without form same as Gen 1:2
Jer4:24 I beheld the mountains, and, lo, they trembled, and all the hills moved lightly.
Jer4:25 I beheld, and, lo, there was no man, and all the birds of the heavens were fled.
Jer4:26 I beheld, and, lo, the fruitful place was a wilderness, and all the cities thereof were broken down at the presence of the LORD, and by his fierce anger.
Jer4:27 For thus hath the LORD said, The whole land shall be desolate; yet will I not make a full end.
Jer4:28 For this shall the earth mourn, and the heavens above be black; because I have spoken it, I have purposed it, and will not repent, neither will I turn back from it.
originally posted by: AnAbsoluteCreation
I asked a creationist if he believed that scientists know the speed of light. He said sure. I said how can we see light from 200 million years ago if we've only been here 6,000?
He didn't have a rebuttal.
AAC.
originally posted by: PurpleDog UK
originally posted by: AnAbsoluteCreation
I asked a creationist if he believed that scientists know the speed of light. He said sure. I said how can we see light from 200 million years ago if we've only been here 6,000?
He didn't have a rebuttal.
AAC.
Excellent point made and a HUGE FLAW in any Creationalist (numbskulls) thinking…..
PDUK
originally posted by: AlphaHawk
a reply to: Rob48
someone who is currently under investigation for inciting violence
Oh wow, is there more information about that?
I swear the health wanker had at least one person here driving traffic to his site too..
originally posted by: stormbringer1701
oy. just read Genesis in Hebrew and with a good concordance and the young earth theory is destroyed by a single word; which is mistranslated in the English version. you cannot really be a fundamentalist if you cannot read the fundamentals properly in the first place. The Bible does not say the earth is any specific age and supports a vast geological age easier than a young age once you take that mistranslated word into account and correlate it to verses elsewhere in the bible such as in Isaiah and 2nd Peter; etc.
originally posted by: AlphaHawk
a reply to: R_Clark
Nope, Armitage is being intellectually dishonest..
Mark wasn’t fired because he discovered something that was challenging evolution.
He was fired because he showed a completely lack of intellectual honesty and was misrepresenting discoveries in order to make a personal profit as a speaker of creationism. And in this law suit? Mark has won no matter what.
Either Mark wins and so allows the usage of real science to make fallacious claims by protecting it as freedom of religion. Or Mark loses the cases and becomes a poster child for the expelled trope of creationists where he profits from travelling about claiming that he is the creationist science tried to silence.
freethoughtblogs.com...
originally posted by: Hilux1996
a reply to: helius
The Evolution theory has a political agenda and Christianity doesn't?
That's a bit 2 faced isn't it?
If people want to believe a ridiculous thing like the world is only 6,000 years old and worship a celestial body then that's up to them.
But there are other theories out there that so far are just theories. Just like the Christian theory. I like the Annunaki theory that we were created by Aliens. Even the book of Genesis references the Aliens creating us!
The 6,000 year old world statement is just plain stupid especially when there are structures and ruins out there that have been dated to over 300,000 years.
Yikes!
I think the dinosaur man up there has been manipulating his figures slightly to conform to his belief system. He's gone a bit further than a foot in the door and a Watchtower magazine thrust in your face......lol