New Nazca Lines geoglyphs uncovered by gales and sandstorms in Peru

New Nazca geoglyphs have been uncovered by Eduardo Herrán Gómez de la Torre. It is thought that heavy winds and sandstorms contributed to the uncovering of the glyphs.

The glyphs are said to contain a bird, a snake, camelids (or llamas) and a zig zag line, according to The Independent.

Archeologists are already examining the site, with one saying that they confirm a close link between water and the ancient artworks themselves:

Archaeologists are already trying to confirm whether they match the Paracas culture in the Ica region of Peru, which flourished from 800BC to 100BC and influenced complex textiles and ceramics at Nazca as well as the lines.

One archaeologist, Orefici Giuseppe Pecci, said the geoglyphs confirmed the close relationship between the ancient artworks and water.

www.independent.co.uk/news/science/archaeology/news/new-nazca-lines-geoglyphs-uncovered-by-gales-and-sandstorms-in-peru-9645983.html

Great news. I've always wondered who those people were to have put so much effort into drawing shapes and figures that could only have been seen from the air.

a reply to: stormcell

The people of the area were a nomad group called the Paracas, they came to South America from the East. They were a group of ancient aliens who were likely made by a higher group of ancient aliens that left them here, that is why they made the pictures. They didn't have a problem with being here, earth was their first planet. In ancient times they were called the Igigi. This group of beings go all the way back to the ancient flood, because there is a depiction of them right after the flood with king Nimrod who was a giant. The giants were probably alien too, because one of them flew over the sea to Central America, built a pyramid and named Quetzalcoatl, then went back to the East.

In April 2014 the DNA tests of the Paracas proved to be nonhuman. There is a lot of commotion and nonbelievers hooting about it but that is just because they are too stubborn and egotistical to understand all of this.

a reply to: greyer

There is a lot of commotion and nonbelievers hooting about it but that is just because they are too stubborn and egotistical to understand all of this.

Or maybe instead of being stubborn or egotistical, the facts and scientific evidence to backup such claims just aren't there?

originally posted by: greyer
a reply to: stormcell



In April 2014 the DNA tests of the Paracas proved to be nonhuman. There is a lot of commotion and nonbelievers hooting about it but that is just because they are too stubborn and egotistical to understand all of this.

stubbornness and ego have definitely got their fingerprints all over this, but you're attributing it to the wrong hands because your statement about Paracas craniums DNA is completely false. they have been proven to be HSS and nothing more. cite any paper that's not a youtube or facebook posting by Brian Foerster that says the DNA from those remains is non terrestrial and I'll sign over the deed to my house.

originally posted by: greyer
a reply to: stormcell

The people of the area were a nomad group called the Paracas, they came to South America from the East. They were a group of ancient aliens who were likely made by a higher group of ancient aliens that left them here, that is why they made the pictures. They didn't have a problem with being here, earth was their first planet. In ancient times they were called the Igigi. This group of beings go all the way back to the ancient flood, because there is a depiction of them right after the flood with king Nimrod who was a giant. The giants were probably alien too, because one of them flew over the sea to Central America, built a pyramid and named Quetzalcoatl, then went back to the East.

....and you know this how?

In April 2014 the DNA tests of the Paracas proved to be nonhuman. There is a lot of commotion and nonbelievers hooting about it but that is just because they are too stubborn and egotistical to understand all of this.

Actually no this is a Brien Foerester fraud - you do know that don't you?

originally posted by: greyer
a reply to: stormcell

The people of the area were a nomad group called the Paracas, they came to South America from the East. They were a group of ancient aliens who were likely made by a higher group of ancient aliens that left them here, that is why they made the pictures. They didn't have a problem with being here, earth was their first planet. In ancient times they were called the Igigi. This group of beings go all the way back to the ancient flood, because there is a depiction of them right after the flood with king Nimrod who was a giant. The giants were probably alien too, because one of them flew over the sea to Central America, built a pyramid and named Quetzalcoatl, then went back to the East.

In April 2014 the DNA tests of the Paracas proved to be nonhuman. There is a lot of commotion and nonbelievers hooting about it but that is just because they are too stubborn and egotistical to understand all of this.

You just Blew My Mind

originally posted by: Hanslune

....and you know this how?

Well that is it - the picture carved in stone from ancient Babylon. The pictures shows king Nimrod with a bunch of the famed alien gods around him.

First when you look at Sumerian history, you can see that the original kings before the flood came down from the skies many 1,000s of years ago. Ancient Egypt also has a kings list going back the same. The bible agrees. When you read from the Sumerian tablets you learn that before a higher group of gods made Adam they made the Igigi, a race which was more like them but was still created to be a slave race on earth.

After the days of the Exodus humans revolted against the Igigi and they migrated to the West. They humans all the things that they taught in the East, which is why we have all the anomalies. Like many ancient people researchers don't know where the Paracas came from and the Paracas were only in the area for a couple centuries, so based on archaeological evidence it's obvious they kept moving west, unless you think they got beamed up like Scottie.

Actually no this is a Brien Foerester fraud - you do know that don't you?

What evidence do you have for that? I will believe if it is true but Brian is not a fraud, and the results are good.

a reply to: daaskapital

I was just reading about this on Faceboook! What a cool find.

I find the Nazca Lines quite interesting, I mean you can only see what they are from above yet they didn't have aircraft the, so why make something that can only be seen from the sky?

Googled and didn't find any pictures of the new glyphs, I'd love to see what they've found!

originally posted by: Hanslune

originally posted by: greyer
a reply to: stormcell

The people of the area were a nomad group called the Paracas, they came to South America from the East. They were a group of ancient aliens who were likely made by a higher group of ancient aliens that left them here, that is why they made the pictures. They didn't have a problem with being here, earth was their first planet. In ancient times they were called the Igigi. This group of beings go all the way back to the ancient flood, because there is a depiction of them right after the flood with king Nimrod who was a giant. The giants were probably alien too, because one of them flew over the sea to Central America, built a pyramid and named Quetzalcoatl, then went back to the East.

....and you know this how?

In April 2014 the DNA tests of the Paracas proved to be nonhuman. There is a lot of commotion and nonbelievers hooting about it but that is just because they are too stubborn and egotistical to understand all of this.

Actually no this is a Brien Foerester fraud - you do know that don't you?

^^^ there you go again! First of all Brien has not claimed the skull to be alien! My god if you actually followed his work, watched his videos, read his blogs and books you would know that. All you do is dis his work because it doesn't fit in with mainstream archaeology or because you don't like that he sells books and tours. The results as of April state there is DNA of unknown origin that doesn't match anything we know, that does not mean alien! They said more tests will need to be done, so there aren't and definitive answers from Brien. In fact it also states that it may be a human species we have not seen before. There are just theories, nobody is claiming them to be anything right now other than an amazing piece of history. I would believe a different human species more than aliens and I'm an alien fanatic but I do not think everything on this planet that is unexplained is due to aliens. There is far too much about our history we do not know and will never know.


I really wish people would STOP misquoting Brien. I thoroughly enjoy his work. It's interesting and he has a passion for it. Someone doesn't need fancy degrees to know their chosen field! I think his experience and how much work he has put into these topics is far better than some piece of paper. I am looking forward to his new book on Egypt as well.

As for this members other claims on them being alien. I have never heard of that in all my reading I this topic.

originally posted by: mblahnikluver
a reply to: daaskapital

I was just reading about this on Faceboook! What a cool find.

I find the Nazca Lines quite interesting, I mean you can only see what they are from above yet they didn't have aircraft the, so why make something that can only be seen from the sky?

That not exactly correct the ones on the lower flat ground can be seen from the surrounding hills and the ones on hill sides can of course be seen from other hills and from the flat areas.

a reply to: mblahnikluver

Where yes he spins an interesting notion of another human species living in the andes he deliberately builds up hype to get you're money.

Instead of using a reputable scientist or labs he decided to send his samples given to him by the Paracas museum in Peru too Lloyd Pye (same guy who was promoting the starchild skull) who of course confirmed his ideas.
The other one apparently found that the DNA sample had no relation to any human species or animal ever recorded. Think about that for a moment.

Don't believe everything that guy says..


Are those pictures in the OP of the new glyphs? I love new finds like this.

a reply to: greyer

Well, if they were created by aliens, why did they do a half ass job making the shapes of the animals and insects.....so crappy?! I mean, when I think of people from outer space, I expect them to do something astonishing...

a reply to: mblahnikluver

BF is a fraud - did he send his samples to a reputable scientific lab? Nope he sent it to a serial fraud to do and guess what they didn't come out with a answer - just like the other fraud did the star child for x number of years.

I don't dis BF I tell the truth about him.

a reply to: daaskapital

Ah the zig zag line, well known amongst space travellers. Lol

originally posted by: greyer

originally posted by: Hanslune

....and you know this how?

Well that is it - the picture carved in stone from ancient Babylon. The pictures shows king Nimrod with a bunch of the famed alien gods around him.

..and that has what to do with this?

First when you look at Sumerian history, you can see that the original kings before the flood came down from the skies many 1,000s of years ago. Ancient Egypt also has a kings list going back the same. The bible agrees. When you read from the Sumerian tablets you learn that before a higher group of gods made Adam they made the Igigi, a race which was more like them but was still created to be a slave race on earth.

You do realize that the king lists are imaginary or do you believe that Sumerians were the first and only people in history not to make stuff up for religious reasons? The Sumerians don't have a history going back as far as they liked to imagine, nor was their a flood. You seem to be taking religious myths as history - explain if you could what other proof there is that the tablets aren't just myths and folklore?

After the days of the Exodus humans revolted against the Igigi and they migrated to the West. They humans all the things that they taught in the East, which is why we have all the anomalies. Like many ancient people researchers don't know where the Paracas came from and the Paracas were only in the area for a couple centuries, so based on archaeological evidence it's obvious they kept moving west, unless you think they got beamed up like Scottie.

They were probably conquered and absorbed by another culture - an occurrence that was quite common in western SA as cultures rose and fell for thousands of years.

What evidence do you have for that? I will believe if it is true but Brian is not a fraud, and the results are good.

Who did he send the sample too - that should tell you all you need to know.

originally posted by: 5letters
a reply to: greyer

Well, if they were created by aliens, why did they do a half ass job making the shapes of the animals and insects.....so crappy?! I mean, when I think of people from outer space, I expect them to do something astonishing...

That is a great point.

But if there were actual aliens coming down (whether be the form of giants, greys, fairies, trolls, praying mantis and alike) it would make sense that we were being visited in the recent past. And as you probably know there was a ton of commotion the last 70s years because of all these military affairs with strange lights in the skies. So if we were visited, then it is easy to believe that something like this went on.

We have to remember that ever since an ET landing in ancient times, in the very beginning, all humans worshiped aliens no matter how they be. When an ancient person saw a UFO doing maneuvers high in the sky they didn't worship that but were just very confused, then attributed it to the gods. All all cases humans tried to mimic the gods and be like them, whether it was building pyramids or carving in stone. And there always a big difference, "here is the Inca rubble, and here are the smooth monoliths," "here are the animals carved at Gobekli Tepe, and there are the carvings of bird goddesses," "here are the pyramids of rubble built by later Egyptian dynasties, here are the perfectly erected 100 ton stones of the Temple for the Sphinx."

The other thing that we cannot imagine is really how they looked. The great pyramids had a polished outer layer of white tura stone originally which was all removed by later humans for something else. They say the sun would gleam off of it. We really don't know how old they are. You can tell even from looking at the stones, the stones in the great pyramids are the only ones that big, but they are eroded naturally by far compared to the others. They say 8,000 to 10,000 years but that is at least 8,000 years ago. I would not be surprised at all that the great pyramids go back over 20,000 years ago. Could it be millions of years old?

Well a fascinating things is the way they carved huge blocks of stone. Skeptics think they carried these stones from vast distances, in one case they think the stones were thrown off a 250 foot cliff on the way to their destination. In certain evidence we can see obvious drill marks into incredibly hard stone. They are drill marks in multiple shapes and circles.

Now here is where it gets interesting. One would have to do a ton of research. Out of the many flood myths of ancient times, they all say slightly different stories. Many of them have a character that builds a boat and has other unique traits that are the same as Noah in the bible. The very first flood story that humans know about, on the oldest cuneiform tablet that we have discovered, it is written that Noah 'drilled' the doors shut to the large boat. The bible says God shut the door and other accounts are different, but the most ancient one going farthest back specifically said that 'Noah' had a drill.

originally posted by: Hanslune
..and that has what to do with this?

Yes, and it is amazing that we find a tie from ancient Babylon all the way to the mysterious civilizations of South America. It is not often that you have a group of 'gods' descend on our mountains and create hybrids. It was a depiction of earlier, for what they knew about their ancient day. The very mysterious thing that confirms we are talking alien is that there are two suns in the sky. This is symbolic for the normal sun, and the alien craft.

So we think that during the 80s there was a big abduction phenomena and hybrids were being created, people would later be abducted again and shown their alien looking hybrids. Well if that happened, then it makes it possible that in ancient times it could have happened on a full out large scale, with the hybrids dominating earth for some time. Then we have the ancient stories telling us so. Then we have the elongated skulls.

You do realize that the king lists are imaginary or do you believe that Sumerians were the first and only people in history not to make stuff up for religious reasons? The Sumerians don't have a history going back as far as they liked to imagine, nor was their a flood. You seem to be taking religious myths as history - explain if you could what other proof there is that the tablets aren't just myths and folklore?

That kings list doesn't have any resemblance of being a joke. But, the Egyptians had the same thing. And they way it was portrayed where it was portrayed, let's us know that it was not a made up fairy tale to them but the believed it to be true and sacred history. It doesn't just belong to the Sumerians.

Brian's people are credible. It is that people don't want to believe so they think of anything to deny it.