It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
originally posted by: MALBOSIA
originally posted by: Humanity4Ever
a reply to: MALBOSIA
Do you honestly think it's that easy for any military to go in and apprehend terrorist militants and target missile launchers without causing collateral damage, given the circumstances?
Like I said previously, the IDF has two choices. Retaliate against terrorist aggression and incur the wrath of the global community, or succumb to the tactics of Hamas, and absorb missiles being fired on Israeli civilians as well as terror tunnels leading into Israel.
Oh, I forgot to mention a third option that would satisfy Hamas' requirements. Israel could also simply cease to exist.
No actually they can go in and get their targets. Every other military does it. Israel should stop acting like cowards and maybe there would be a lot less dead innocent civilians. Your right, collateral damage may happen. 1400 of them? You suck pretty bad if that is the case.
The argument that missile strikes and bombing campaigns are the only way to keep casualties down, really does't have a leg to stand on so anyone that uses it comes off like a gimp retard IMHO.
And YES. Israel no longer existing is a viable option. I would back that and so would most of the world. They have proven they do not deserve the land.
so many human beings have been murdered and yet nary a newstory come out , just because these humans are not american and european nationality they dont worth the air-time for the western medias..
originally posted by: RAY1990
I just want to post a few facts in this thread.
1. The U.N discovered rockets on U.N sanctioned land and immediately contacted the local authorities who's jurisdiction it was to handle such weapons.
2. In no way has the U.N ever supported the hiding, smuggling or any other activity concerning contraband such as weaponry, drugs or any other illicit materials. If a member of the U.N was found to be supporting such activities he/she would be convicted.
So, what is so hard to understand about those 2 facts?
Concerning fact 1, what would anyone here in this thread suggest the U.N should do in such a situation? It is a neutral body who's main goal is securing of peace and ensuring the protection of universal human rights so it couldn't exactly phone up Israel an say " Hey guy's those douche bags Hamas have stored a few rockets in our school... Fancy blowing them up?"
No they couldn't do that, they had to follow protocol and reported them to the authorities in charge of the area. For comparison lets say your a European on holiday in Canada. You witnessed an American being murdered by a Canadian, do you high tail it to the states and report the murder or do you contact the local authorities whom have jurisdiction on the land and the legal authority to investigate the murder?
fact 2, where are people getting off that the U.N are supporting HAMAS?
Go read the United Nations mission statement, they cannot support anyone other than humanity. They pick no sides and anyone found picking sides doesn't deserve any association with the U.N. They do not support or help Hamas they do not support or help Israel.
Now I have queries about the U.N, I honestly believe without all the red tape and paperwork associated with getting things 100% correct and neutral they'd achieve so much more... But then they wouldn't be the U.N would they.
originally posted by: charles1952
a reply to: tsingtao
Dear tsingtaao,
I'd like to run an idea past you, if you don't mind. It just popped into my head while reviewing the thread, so I haven't checked it for holes. Would you undertake that for me?
I've noticed that Hamas will fire a bunch of rockets, Israel responds, Hamas calls Israel unbalanced haters, then runs, hides until it's ready to start firing again.
Is it possible that the pro-Hamas people will fire off a bunch of charges without any regard for the truth, other posters respond pointing out factual and logical errors, the pro-hamas people call the other posters unbalanced haters, then they run away and hide until they can start a new thread (or derail an existing one).
Is this strategy unique to Hamas and it's supporters? Does it also apply to political parties? Is it a wide spread human trait? Maybe you have the answer?
Oh, for anyone else reading and searching for nits, I know "nobody" is pro-Hamas now. People used to be, but it's no longer fashionable now that the word is leaking out that Hamas is a pack of cowardly dogs, eating their own vomit, willing to kill their own people if they don't show sufficient loyalty. They're treacherous piles of goat dung, looking for and stirring up hatred, slugs without honor who don't keep their word.
With respect,
Charles1952
originally posted by: charles1952
a reply to: MALBOSIA
Dear MALBOSIA,
Your question wasnt to me but can i still answer?
That's a tough question, I don't know yet. Why don't you write a post attempting to answer the question I asked and we'll see if you can answer it?
They already have, or to be more accurate, they never had such a campaign. They don't want Gaza, they've proved that. If they wanted to annihilate the Palestinian people, the job would have been finished by now.
YES. Israel should surrender it's campaign to annihilate the Palestinian people and annex their land. That would solve the problem.
When can we start?
I know, let's do it right away. I propose a 72 hour cease fire.
With respect,
Charles1952
originally posted by: tsingtao
so you would just send your men door to door? lol in an urban environment.
they will go in after the area is bombed up pretty good. makes more sense, ya think?
and how many of the 14-1600 are really confirmed by independents?
ya, israel no longer existing ain't gonna happen.
originally posted by: charles1952
Is it possible that the pro-Hamas people will fire off a bunch of charges without any regard for the truth, other posters respond pointing out factual and logical errors, the pro-hamas people call the other posters unbalanced haters, then they run away and hide until they can start a new thread (or derail an existing one).
originally posted by: charles1952
a reply to: buntalanlucu
Welcome to ATS! May your days be full of wisdom and peace.
I'm really sorry. I was ready to go along with you, then you said this:
so many human beings have been murdered and yet nary a newstory come out , just because these humans are not american and european nationality they dont worth the air-time for the western medias..
I know you're new to ATS, but I suspect that there are a dozen threads here, if not more, emphasizing the deaths of people in Gaza. Some of the stories are faked, but it's a little trickier to know how many.
I try to stay away from network news, so I can't say how they're treating it, but I'd wager a nickel that if they're ignoring any deaths, they're the Israeli ones.
But it's likely that you have a wider range of sources than I do, so feel free to teach me. For me, ATS is all about learning.
originally posted by: charles1952
a reply to: tsingtao
Dear tsingtaao,
I'd like to run an idea past you, if you don't mind. It just popped into my head while reviewing the thread, so I haven't checked it for holes. Would you undertake that for me?
I've noticed that Hamas will fire a bunch of rockets, Israel responds, Hamas calls Israel unbalanced haters, then runs, hides until it's ready to start firing again.
Is it possible that the pro-Hamas people will fire off a bunch of charges without any regard for the truth, other posters respond pointing out factual and logical errors, the pro-hamas people call the other posters unbalanced haters, then they run away and hide until they can start a new thread (or derail an existing one).
Is this strategy unique to Hamas and it's supporters? Does it also apply to political parties? Is it a wide spread human trait? Maybe you have the answer?
Oh, for anyone else reading and searching for nits, I know "nobody" is pro-Hamas now. People used to be, but it's no longer fashionable now that the word is leaking out that Hamas is a pack of cowardly dogs, eating their own vomit, willing to kill their own people if they don't show sufficient loyalty. They're treacherous piles of goat dung, looking for and stirring up hatred, slugs without honor who don't keep their word.
With respect,
Charles1952
originally posted by: MALBOSIA
originally posted by: tsingtao
so you would just send your men door to door? lol in an urban environment.
they will go in after the area is bombed up pretty good. makes more sense, ya think?
and how many of the 14-1600 are really confirmed by independents?
ya, israel no longer existing ain't gonna happen.
Are missiles being fired door to door looking for rockets? How about use the same intel that told Israel that behind those children where Hamas rockets and send troops to THAT door. Is that what Israel is doing? firing missiles and bombs door to door. I was giving them the benefit of the doubt that they had SOME kind of intel confirming that those children were hiding rockets.
How many are confirmed? well, if they are tell me 1,400 you can probably bet it is a whole lot more. Western media isn't in the habit of burning Israel in fact they are in the habit of burning anything that makes Israel look bad. Even my beloved CBC went to Israel and let that pig benny puke all over the tax payers microphone.
And you better hope that the US stays on it's feet and helping Israel then. Once the buck stops....
(Reuters) - An Israeli air strike killed at least 10 people and wounded about 30 others on Sunday in a U.N.-run school in the southern Gaza Strip, a Palestinian official said, as dozens died in Israeli shelling of the enclave and Hamas fired rockets at Israel.
The Israeli military said it was looking into the reported attack, the second to hit a school in less than a week.