It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
According to cogent information gathered by this paper, Rev. Brother Patrick Nshamdze, was tested positive after he supposedly came in contact with a patient who died from the virus.
Our information divulged that on the 17th of this month, his specimen was taken and the result, which came on the next day (July 18), proved negative.
Not being satisfied, the report further divulged, the ailing Catholic hospital director decided to seek further treatment abroad, but his trip was subjected to Ebola test.
It was based on this that he did another test on Tuesday, July 29, 2014, which proved positive, contrary to the first test he underwent.
originally posted by: raymundoko
a reply to: 00nunya00
No, a good medical worker would verify, especially before telling their family and scaring the crap out of them or risking them telling other people.
A bad medical worker would start calling people "OMG THE EBOLA THE EBOLA. IT'S IN THE FLORA AND FALLING FROM PLANES."
originally posted by: raymundoko
a reply to: MrLimpet
You can't just be exposed to Ebola and right away take a test. I believe a period of time has to pass before you show up as infected on blood tests. So if he was tested within hours of coming in contact with a patient, he would show negative. I think they test you every hour for the first 24-48 hours or some such if you came in direct contact with a symptomatic Ebola carrier.
Br Patrick, born in Cameroon, was tested Ebola positive on July 29, after being sick for two weeks. He had been previously tested on July 18, with a negative result.
Dr. Margaret Chan, the W.H.O. director general, was speaking as she met with the leaders of the three most affected countries — Guinea, Liberia and Sierra Leone — in Conakry, the Guinean capital, for the introduction of a $100 million plan to deploy hundreds more medical professionals in support of overstretched regional and international health workers.
“This meeting must mark a turning point in the outbreak response,” Dr. Chan said, according to a W.H.O. transcript of her remarks. “If the situation continues to deteriorate, the consequences can be catastrophic in terms of lost lives but also severe socioeconomic disruption and a high risk of spread to other countries.”
She said the outbreak was “caused by the most lethal strain in the family of Ebola viruses.”
NY Times.
originally posted by: raymundoko
a reply to: Destinyone
So we should just let disinformation run rampant? if someone posts egregiously wrong information that could potentially induce panic and fear, they need to be called out on it.
Half the people in this thread are doing nothing but attempting to induce fear and panic, and those same people, including you at times, SEEM like they WANT everything to go south.