It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
originally posted by: OccamsRazor04
How is something he saw from the sky an inner Earth continent?
Because he's still in the sky. Just that the sky folds inward into the inner earth and an observer traveling either by land or by plane wouldn't know the difference due to the enormous horizon that is as big as our own earths curvature horizon as they travel inward.
originally posted by: skyblueworld
originally posted by: 3n19m470
a reply to: Mianeye
So he just throws away his credibility by talking about some secret landmass nobody has ever seen? Sounds like a strange move to make. Don't you think such a scam would be well known by now and people would be talking about all the money they got scammed out of by the notorious Admiral Byrd, the Bernie Madoff of the 1940s?
Spot on!
But to some on here, our predecessors were just inferior because in todays world people have the internet..
Most Astronauts who talk about UFO's = Nuts
Most creditable military witnesses = Nuts
Admirals of Navy Fleets = Nuts
E.T.C....E.T.C...
originally posted by: AutumnWitch657
This guy wasn't too bright was he?
originally posted by: FinalCountdown
originally posted by: OccamsRazor04
How is something he saw from the sky an inner Earth continent?
Because he's still in the sky. Just that the sky folds inward into the inner earth and an observer traveling either by land or by plane wouldn't know the difference due to the enormous horizon that is as big as our own earths curvature horizon as they travel inward.
MARCH 12, 1952 Participants: Representative John F. Kennedy (D-MA) interviewed by William Bradford Huie and Donald I. Rogers. Topics: Eisenhower and Kefauver victories in the New Hampshire Presidential primary, Kennedy's own relative position within the spectrum of the Democratic Party, possibility of his running for the Senate, foreign spending, danger of communist expansion in Southeast Asia, and low American prestige in the Middle East. (200LW68)
JUNE 25, 1952 Participants: Senator Joseph R. McCarthy (R-WI) interviewed by William Bradford Huie and Donald I. Rogers. Topics: Presidential and senatorial campaigns in Wisconsin, his book McCarthyism-The Fight for America, and exposure of "communists and crooks" in the federal government. (200LW114)
SEPTEMBER 29, 1952 Participants: Senator Joseph R. McCarthy (R-WI) interviewed by William Bradford Huie and Henry Hazlitt. Topics: Review of McCarthy's speaking tour in support of the Republican national ticket and against the Truman administration, interpretation of his recent senatorial victory, and origin of the term "McCarthyism." (200LW144)
MAY 8, 1953 Participants: Representative James E. Van Zandt (R-PA) interviewed by William Bradford Huie and William H. Peterson. Topics: Criticism of U.S. participation in the Korean war, possible use of the atomic bomb in Korea and Manchuria, the Atomic Energy Commission, reorganization of the Armed Forces, and veterans' legislation. (200LW227)
SEPTEMBER 9, 1953 Participants: Senator Prescott Bush (R-CT) interviewed by Edward P. Morgan and Winston Burdett. Topics: Former President Truman's Labor Day speech attacking the Republican administration, the rise in interest rates, the cold war, and decisive issues in 1954 congressional elections. (200LW602)
OCTOBER 11, 1954 Participants: Senator Prescott Bush (R-CT) interviewed by Larry Lesueur and Kenneth Crawford. Topics: Highway improvement funds, toll roads, housing graft investigations, and rehabilitation home owner loans. (200LW603)
AUGUST 23, 1954 Participants: Senator Albert Gore (D-TN) interviewed by Larry Lesueur and August Heckscher. Topics: Relations between the 83d Congress and the President, Gore's opposition to the Atomic Energy bill, and criticism of the Dixon-Yates atomic energy contract approved by President Dwight D. Eisenhower over Atomic Energy Commission objections. (200LW494)
originally posted by: bbracken677
a reply to: skyblueworld
My only question would be, in this age of satellites how could we still be "missing" land the size of the US?
Surely he was commenting on how much larger Antarctica is than the Arctic. He would have seen ice that extended many times that of the ice coverage at the North Pole. I think we are trying to interpret his observations with today's perceptions instead of from the viewpoint of someone who has seen something (Antarctica) from the air as no one else had previously.