It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
originally posted by: Aazadan
originally posted by: darkbake
a reply to: demus
This pretty much puts these guys solidly on my bad list, most of the time I can see both sides, but these are radical Islamic terrorists destroying churches and mosques, it sounds pretty destructive, like chaotic evil harbingers of death or something. And they do it while spreading the word of God, to top it all off.
A tomb is a symbol of idolatry, something strictly forbidden in their interpretation of Islam. They're not doing it because they want to be jackasses, they're doing it because their religion tells them to. That doesn't make it right, but it's their line of thought.
originally posted by: myselfaswell
a reply to: darkbake
Reminds me of this story from 2001. The Taliban; Destroyers of Ancient Buddha Statues.
Source Here
An absolute demonstration of the cultural void that fundamental Islam is in reality.
And we all know what happened shortly after the above event.
Kind Regards
Myselfaswell
originally posted by: Aazadan
originally posted by: TrueBrit
Why would they wish to destroy such a site? What are they going to do next, nuke Mecca? I fail entirely to understand the motivation for this sort of action. Surely blowing the place up, destroying all the ancient relics and architecture, is counter productive to their stated cause?
Either the artifacts are heresy and detract from the worshop of Allah in which case they need to be destroyed or they simply reiterate what the Qu'ran states in which case they aren't needed. That's their line of thinking.
originally posted by: sepermeru
a reply to: demus
I know who gains, but what do they gain?
What, as you say, might they be seeking to find, or to destroy?
originally posted by: TrueBrit
a reply to: darkbake
This is utterly disgraceful.
Why would they wish to destroy such a site? What are they going to do next, nuke Mecca? I fail entirely to understand the motivation for this sort of action. Surely blowing the place up, destroying all the ancient relics and architecture, is counter productive to their stated cause?
They are also poising to take over Rome.
I bet they never touch anything that has money coming in from tourism like the Sphynx and pyramids.
ISIS is leaving a path of destroyed churches, shrines and mosques in its wake as it storms across Syria and Iraq, and has even set its sights on Mecca -- Islam's holiest site.
The message from ISIS:
"By Allah's leave our sheikh al-Baghdadi led Mecca stone for those who worship (pilgrims) will kill you and God ' I will tear down the Ka'ba, the place of worship,” the alleged ISIS militant said on the social media site, according to reports from Turkish media adding that those of the Islamic faith should not be worshipping 'stones.'"
originally posted by: glend
Islamist blowing up mosques and Jonah's Tomb! If I didn't know any better I'd think these terrorist weren't Islamic at all but a paid militant group hired to ignite peoples hatred against Islam. But as we all know the media doesn't lie does it. If it wasn't for the media replaying the WMD mantra a million times we would never have got all that WMD out of Saddam Hussein hands .
ISIS Trained by US military
U.S. diplomats and intelligence officials made clear that the United States had been closely tracking the al Qaida spinoff since 2012,
The testimony, which received little news media attention at the time, also showed that Obama administration officials were well aware of the group’s declared intention to turn its Syrian sanctuary into a springboard from which it would send men and materiel back into Iraq and unleash waves of suicide bombings there. And they knew that the Iraqi security forces couldn’t handle it
He acknowledged that the Islamic State is no longer just a regional terrorist organization but a “full-blown” army that now controls nearly 50 percent of Iraq and more than one-third of Syria. Its fighters have turned back some of the best-trained Iraqi units trying to retake key cities, while in Syria, it’s seized nearly all that country’s oil and natural gas fields and is pushing the Syrian military from its last outposts in the country’s east.
“What started as a crisis in Syria has become a regional disaster with serious global implications,” Rep. Ed Royce, R-Calif., the chairman of the House Foreign Affairs Committee, said Wednesday.
We did see this coming,” said Royce, adding that Iraqi officials and some diplomats at the U.S. Embassy in Baghdad began urging the administration in August 2013 to launch U.S. drone strikes against Islamic State bases near Iraq’s border with Syria.
One complicating factor was the administration’s approach to Syria and the uprising there to topple President Bashar Assad, a goal President Barack Obama adopted as America’s own in an August 2011 statement that said Assad had lost all legitimacy to rule and must go.
Some experts argue that Obama committed a key error in 2012 by rejecting calls from top national security aides, lawmakers and others to train and arm a moderate rebel force to fight Assad.
Obama administration officials say that rejection was based on a variety of concerns, including that weapons passed to moderate rebels might end up in the hands of more radical elements
What is indisputable, Smyth said, is that the White House became immobilized by the complexity of the crisis:
Read more here: www.mercedsunstar.com...=cpy
originally posted by: TrueBrit
a reply to: darkbake
This is utterly disgraceful.
Why would they wish to destroy such a site? What are they going to do next, nuke Mecca?