What the world (UN) should to be doing: Exterminate ISIS and end the slaughter in Gaza

a reply to: Willtell
I must wonder if Israel is willingly, knowingly sacrificing itself to cause a modern crusade against Islam.

That comment is ludicrous based on the sheer idea of it, but it has a legitimate basis based on history and Jewish philosophy. It is now known that TPTB in the Jewish population were determined to allow an incredible amount of suffering to be inflicted upon their kind under Nazism. They worked within that evil because they had their own agenda to fulfill and fulfill it they did.

Suppose that the present Jewish hierarchy had designs on starting--by instigation--in their own backyard the beginning of what will become WWIII? Yes, Israel eventually would be totally destroyed. Millions of Jews would die, but millions more, especially the elite, would flee to two place where their political power and money already control most of the Western world. That would be to the US and the UK. Installed in those places under the guise of being refugees and perceived moral obligations, their powers would be immense in controlling every aspect of those two nations far beyond their current capabilities which are, without a doubt, extensive even at present.

The Middle East would be left in rubble, bombed back into the stone age, as they say, and of little threat ever again to other world areas East and West. From the view of the West, the remaining Muslim countries would be easier to handle as well as other threats from other areas.

The efforts of the Jewish people built a strong nation from nothing in less than half a century from the time they sat foot on the deserts of Palestine in 1947. If I were a Jewish planner laying the way toward the future of my people, I would see the allowing of the destruction of Israel, the country, as a logical trade for a better long-term security and more direct control in the host countries. The drive to reestablished the fatherland had served its purpose, a larger plan was in play.

a reply to: Willtell

Is interesting that US and UN didn't have a problem "exterminating Saddam" in Iraq, under Bush, but for some reason Obama can not make its mind about Isis, I guess the muslim ties run deep with our sitting president.

After all Islamic terrorist without a nation, need something to rule over.

2000 years of recorded history on religious wars and atrocities committed in the very name of religions and still humanity hasn't learned the lesson. Religion is the evil within. Is the tool that controls our minds, is the weapon that our most perverted wishes and thoughts use to impose on the unwanted, is the cancer in our brains that can strike death at any moment and time. Is the damnation of our species. Part of our DNA now... Go figure

The UN is just another part of the scam and an Illuminati front.

See the Michael Ellner sig quote...

"The United Nations is the greatest fraud in all History. Its purpose is to destroy the United States." -- John E. Rankin, U.S. Congressman

This is the leading, putatively respectable Britain-based Satan cult (it worships Lucifer). The Lucis Trust, which runs the only religious chapel at the New York United Nations headquarters, The Temple of Understanding, was originaly founded as the Lucifer Trust, in London, in 1923. The Lucis Trust associated with the UNO is the New York affiliate of the British organization. The name was changed from Lucifer Trust, to Lucis Trust, to make the nature of the organization less conspicuous. rense.com...

The New World Order is a spiritual agenda enthroning Lucifer as the god of this earth. Lucis Trust was set up as Lucifer Publishing by theosophist Alice A. Bailey. Don't be deceived.

originally posted by: marg6043
a reply to: Willtell

Is interesting that US and UN didn't have a problem "exterminating Saddam" in Iraq, under Bush, but for some reason Obama can not make its mind about Isis, I guess the muslim ties run deep with our sitting president.

@ times its sensed that to stir up another wasp nest why still dealing with some already stirred can cause a massive swarm. Which also puts some in harms way who provide Services To Others (STO) globally as they attempt to stir the new nest...

I don't know why less destructive means are not in play though where
an -EMP device(s) is/are delivered to certain regions
shuts down region
Mass extractions are permitted
and enforced with drone eyes watching potential attackers of the extracted
and then when all are safe and extracted
and they dark in conscious are left in the dark
respond?

This gets many of the innocent out of these warzones from extraction
leaves the core unbalances within them so they cannot use any innocence shields or launch anything that has been emp exposed
and trims down the core unbalances to better see their prim influences

phase 2-
respond to the prime unbalance influences so they cannot restart elsewhere
then go in use the people from these regions to rebuild if they wish to return, which makes jobs for them and allows them feeling that they built their new homes regions.

Again behind the scenes who knows what intelligence has been obtained on some of these unbalanced Creator Energy Groups (CEG) and what they may be trying to ultimately do (like get a large military force in one location or centered) and respond with maximum carnage in mind...

So the wrong step which may APPEAR as the right step to many (which stirs the nest) may cause more harm to some who are already dedicating themselves (and now they got a swarm) possibly globally to deal with.

reiterate-
emp
extract
remaining centered
respond
/
intelligence on primes
respond
unbalance
rebalanced
example made for any other primes lurking...

GOOD LUCK to us ALL*

originally posted by: Willtell
a reply to: Parthin

Again read the OP

What the world SHOULD BE DOING
If it wasn’t so cockeyed.

It’s a hypothetical possibility if and when the standards and ethics of this world changes.

Also where you so interested in the lives of your children BEFORE THEY WENT INTO IRAQ?

As well the US is all over this since they started the war in Iraq as well give ALL of those weapons to Israel

WE ARE INVOLVED

Iraq started the war in Iraq by invading Kuwait. Our government happily got involved.
Nobody wanted to pay $5 a gallon for gas back then.
Big mistake by everyone involved.

a reply to: paraphi

My op is a statement of objective reality against the possibility of better.

The UN, imo, IS NOT doing much to stop evils in the world.

Where were they when the Bosnia genocide; then the Rwanda genocide, now Christians and” non believers” are being murdered in Iraq and the hypocritical US no nothing WHEN IT IS THEM WHO CAUSED THE DAM PROBLEM IN THE FIRST PLACE!

I MILLION OR MORE Palestinians are the subject of mad men and the UN does nothing.


Sure they do some good but objective reality notes that they are very insufficient.

As far as ISIS is concerned, I would not be surprised if a shady deal was struck stating that if ISIS fought against Assad and his regime they would allow them to take a part of Iraq and Syria for themselves.

Iraqi soldiers just cut and run, the "coalition" didn't do anything about it, except maybe offer some airstrikes which they felt would be a waste of time and money.

Things are never as they seem on the surface.

a reply to: Aliensun

What we need alien Sun is some alien intervention.

But the problem there is that not even the aliens know what in the world is wrong with humankind!

They wonder what ails a creature that slaughters children

Starves each other to death

Murderess their young people in wars

Rapes their daughters, mothers and woman

Molests their children

Ruins the environment

Makes weapons of mass destruction like we make candy

Watches each other starve to death

And they wonder why the DIA airport has pictures of only children in paradise

This day, the day they still murder children

I AM ASHAMED OF BEING A HUMAN BEING!

..and I hurt real bad inside...

originally posted by: Willtell
Where were they when the Bosnia genocide; then the Rwanda genocide, now Christians and” non believers” are being murdered in Iraq and the hypocritical US no nothing WHEN IT IS THEM WHO CAUSED THE DAM PROBLEM IN THE FIRST PLACE!

Yeas, like I said. The OP sees the world as simple.

Muslims have been merrily killing each other since before the US was created. ISIS is just an extension of this brutal struggle between two Islamic denominations. The only thing the US did wrong was to think they could intervene. In Iraq they were just in the crossfire of two parts of the Muslim community Bent on killing each other.

Regardless, there are millions of people in the Middle East benefitting from UN agencies.

Regards

a reply to: Willtell

There is no solution to these crimes that would bring a peace that either you or I will witness. Nevertheless, I am neither morose nor discouraged. Our job is to teach our children to be better than we have been, and then one day, the blood will stop flowing. Then children will play without fearing the deadly rain.

a reply to: Willtell
What you mean is what the U.S. military should be doing. "The world" lacks to the will to do more that pass empty resolutions and economic sanctions. And IMO, here is what the U.S. military should do about it: nothing. The list of Western interventions in the Middle East from the collapse of the Ottoman Empire until now is a lengthy one, and, as of today, there is nothing helpful to show for it.

originally posted by: Willtell
a reply to: MrSpad


It is you who needs to check your history out.

Read the thread.

I said the world should intervene when extreme crises result from incidents like Gaza and Iraq.


Also, it was the US that created the conditions in Iraq for ISIS, therefore they ARE RESPONSIBLE.

That puny force you talk about was nothing like a world wide force I recommended.


And its the US who gives Israel all those lethal arms that are now doing all this damage.

So you think that adding US troops to the mix in Iraq so that ISIS would have a huge new recruting tool, half the people fighting ISIS would change sides, and even more people would die on all sides is a good idea? Oh yeah, that is brillliant. What could go wrong.

And Israel happens to build many of their own weapons, including their small arms, tanks, missles, armored personel carriers, boats, UAVs etc. About the only thing Isreal depends on the US for is aricraft. And if the US cut Israel off Russia would just pick up the slack.

a reply to: Ophiuchus 13

I got the feeling that Isis is nothing but another boogie man that is needed in order to keep promoting the war on terror and the brain washing that is always terrorist amid us.

What we get in return is more scaremongering and ifs and not's, beside more laws to keep us oppress in the nation in the name of national security.

Then we most wonder, who was worse in Iraq, US "liberation" or "the Saddam regime".

a reply to: MrSpad

First they came for the Socialists, and I did not speak out-- Because I was not a Socialist. Then they came for the Trade Unionists, and I did not speak out-- Because I was not a Trade Unionist. Then they came for the Jews, and I did not speak out-- Because I was not a Jew. Then they came for me--and there was no one left to speak for me. www.ushmm.org...

I imagine a worldwide moral force, not just the US. Though since they casued the problem by originally invading Iraq they should pay for it and probably lead it. Just to destroy ISIS and normalize the country.

5000 from every country, so it could be a quick wipeout.

What if there was the same kind of force in Germany when they were exterminatiing the Jews.

One in Turkey, when they were exterminating the Armenians.

One in Bosnia when they were exterminating the Muslims.

One in Rwanda when they were exterminating the Tutsi tribe

Then maybe millions of innocent people could have been saved...

Its just that the people think too selfishly, until one day they become the victim.

When are human beings going to learn

There is no one but ourselves to help each other!