going over all this again just now.. i musta been here 3 or 4 times already preparing a response that was hopefully worthy of the good material
offered here so far.. maybe it's a case of less-is-more for now?
the scant notes in the OP were presented as a loose primer.. the very first response was elaborate, elegantly simple (less was more?)
Good stuff. Information games! That's what defines the world these days. The question is no longer "what is real" The question is
now "What do you think is real, how have you invested your power, and how can we control that". The real question each must ask themselves is -
"what are my core values?" If you stand for nothing you will fall for everything, its a very spiritual thing.
which is the crux of the notes & (ongoing) tinfoil construction series;
movies are used to convey 'messages'
information games
..some people like to say "they're just movies" but we've got plenty of film makers waxing lyrical on how they
get to pitch their message to
the audiences of tomorrow
"debates" like that can be sidestepped by the experienced tinfoil hat wearer but there is something yet to be ferreted out about the
intent
(foreknowledge) of these various film-makers, authors, etc
moving on a little, stuff like
Tinfoil hat? Not so much... film art is steeped in metaphor and symbolism.
is also plain & clear (short & sweet,
less is more) (afaic)
...Once that language is learned, some very surprising, often filthy, info is relayed. Take a film lit class...
it's revelatory.
..i think i know what you mean? one of the people who taught me to 'read' things was an old lady who seemed to enjoy exposing all these things (pun
intended)
one of the films she had me watch here was dangerous liasons..
it was around then i started to really "get" the significance of all the 'polarity' stuff & have my mind blown in new ways, seeing 'it' just
about 'everywhere' all over again.. (like when i was pointing out triangles & pyramids to friends)
..at this point, not only is there the 'crazy' aspect of pointing the material out, there's the crazy process of explaining what it means..
a
bit like that "language" alluded to back there.. so we have all this stuff being
hidden (occulted) out in the open.. ironically enough
being used to initiate its audience
so.. uhh, ..it's all wrapped-up & encoded this way for a reason, how does one point at these shapes of things to come?
(which kinda comes back to the point all over again)
why we're seeing *it* constantly expressed in movies & other mass media? (programming *cough*
..stallones expendables pt.1 is another fine
example, it's not so much the intro that's special, or any symbolism expressed [such as when the dictators 'palace' is destroyed] it's the
embedded (polarity) message of the entire movie.. which kinda brings us back to that other point~ are these people 'aware' of what they're actually
putting into their works? ..there's another thing i'll have to try and 'expand on' at some point, a mere process of digging out & quoting older
sections of other rants.. sometimes i think "why bother?" with all this.. but it's partly because of other 'crazy' peoples threads that i've
been able to follow up strange insights on various subjects)
there are three things back there (kubrik, original books & computer graphics) that warrant further ranting..
another time, they lead to various sidestudies just now
the swimming in the sky pic is awesome (thanks for including it)
hopefully a stray reader may be intruiged by the usage of water, swimming & everything else we're mumbling about here (another mention of 'reading
the original book' there warrants a small mention of the movie/book franchise 'Dune', in a similar way the original work has been picked up &
repackaged to a wider [movie] audience, there are also elements of this with game of thrones & the wheel of time novel series, but this is going into
all those 'side-studies' again..)
again.. this all just frustratingly comes back to repeating the same thing over & over
(that movies are used to *program* people -and- are the movie-makers actually aware of what they're doing)
both of which are just vapid & obvious, imho
thanks for helping to get this off the ground, to one day eventually mean something more than it seems to be just now..
for the google AI's sake, i'll link some of the associated
deceptive inferences
made thus far..
..what i should've just said was
Your Life of Pi notes that mention the writer character's interest in a story to make him believe in God, and how he had previously tried to
write a novel over a 2 year period of time and eventually had to throw it out, also describe this character's belief system as "a failed polarity
merge".
From a very interesting previous post of yours 'Polarity Encoding', I learned more about male/female polarities etc.
that male/female meccano set seems to do wonders with all those strange encoded culture myths the world offers..
(probably the reason we see so many overlooked references to it everywhere)
..there will be even more nonsense one day, thanks for egging me on thus far, it's difficult to formulate some kind of cohesive & effective
"strategy" on how to assault the enemy fortification(?) in the occupied grounds history shows retracted skirmishes along many fronts or
geurilla
tactics fare well enough