It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
originally posted by: ignorant_ape
lest apply the reality check of the " inverse square rule " to any aledged effect that this will have on earth
originally posted by: stormbringer1701
Temporarily is a relative term. it is posulated that one of these hypernovaes caused the greatest extinction eveny of the silurian era.
gamma ray emissions of a wolf rayet hypernova last three months. during that time earth rotates on its axis at least 90 times and it, the moon and any other screening planets move 1/4 of a years worth of their orbits.
once the ozone layer is compromised 90 percent of the biodiversity of that era died and that is with the shielding effect of the ocean as the life of that period was almost entirely under the seas.
originally posted by: ignorant_ape
lest apply the reality check of the " inverse square rule " to any aledged effect that this will have on earth
Very distinct yellow/gold on star itself and the lobes were both clearly yellow as well but not as bright as the central star. There are clearly two lobes with the very bright central star between the lobes. Trailing is the very bright lobe. Leading lobe is on West lobe that is dimmer. My first impression is as if a notch is taken out on this lobe more towards north in this lobe. There is a distinct jet that that shoots North that requires moments of great seeing to clearly see. The jet starts just a bit east of Eta Car star and extends a length of around half the diameter of either lobe. On NW lobe there is a distinct darker area within the lobe. ON South lobe there is more of a notch. There is mottled appearance to the trailing brighter lobe in moments of great seeing. Also on that Easterly side there are two dark areas as we move from EtaCar out along the major axis to the trailing edge of the more easterly lobe which I felt was like a peanut shape as this structure necks down in the middle. Must wait for best seeing to really see these. The jet also comes and goes with seeing. The jet points just slightly West of two field stars on northern side of the clearing around Eta Car homunculus nebula main lobed structure. These two stars of very similar magnitude look real nice taken all together for a tight field along with the homunculus nebula.
Gamma ray burst hypothesis[edit]
A small minority of scientists have suggested that the initial extinctions could have been caused by a gamma ray burst originating from a hypernova within 6,000 light years of Earth (in a nearby arm of the Milky Way Galaxy). A ten-second burst would have stripped the Earth's atmosphere of half of its ozone almost immediately, exposing surface-dwelling organisms, including those responsible for planetary photosynthesis, to high levels of ultraviolet radiation.[13][14][15][16] Although the hypothesis is consistent with patterns at the onset of extinction, there is no unambiguous evidence that such a nearby gamma ray burst ever happened.
originally posted by: stormbringer1701
it is pointing in our general direction.
have you seen a picture of eta carinae?
originally posted by: hellobruce
originally posted by: stormbringer1701
it is pointing in our general direction.
How can a star point in any direction?
originally posted by: hellobruce
originally posted by: stormbringer1701
it is pointing in our general direction.
How can a star point in any direction?
originally posted by: ignorant_ape
a reply to: wildespace
actually - it [ invers square ] does apply to focused emmitters
this can be demonstrated by using data from the appollo laser ranging expeiments .
originally posted by: glend
Brightness from year 1810 to now Source: etacar.fcaglp.unlp.edu.ar...
originally posted by: Rob48
originally posted by: glend
Brightness from year 1810 to now Source: etacar.fcaglp.unlp.edu.ar...
Sorry, what are we meant to be worrying about? That chart shows that it is still five orders of magnitude less bright than it was in the 1840s, ie 100 times dimmer.
(One order of magnitude is about 2.512 times change in brightness. 2.512^5 = 100)
Also the increase in brightness is much less steep than it has been in the past so "brightening as never before" seems to be total nonsense.
The hypothetical result is that the star itself appears dramatically brighter, because its line-of-sight extinction has been substantially reduced, while the Homunculus brightens by a lesser amount because of a combination of modestly larger intrinsic brightness and modestly smaller circumstellar extinction. We have no particular confidence that this is the correct explanation, but it seems plausible and illustrates that the observed behavior is not absurd from a theoretical viewpoint.
The hypotheses of a significant luminosity increase and of rapid grain destruction are each independently of great theoretical interest, and we cannot yet rule out the possibility of a new major eruption. Evidently η Car, always a rewarding subject for observation, merits special attention in the next few months and years.