It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Claiming that the USA has nothing to do with Ukraine is equally absurd, considering the mountain of evidence against such a notion.
originally posted by: paraphi
Like I said, the fact that the UN, EU or OSEC were not invited to monitor the sham plebiscite in Crimea is because they would have reported that it was a sham. Best invite some mates, call them "EU monitors" and make everyone think it was all above board and not what it was.
Regards
Reuters) - Crimea's planned March 16 referendum on joining Russia is illegal in its current form and the OSCE will not send a mission to observe it, the Swiss head of Europe's security and democracy watchdog said on Monday.
An OSCE spokeswoman said earlier that Crimea could not invite referendum observers as the region was not a full-fledged state and therefore not a member of the 57-member organization.
The authorities of the Autonomous Republic of Crimea will allocate up to 2 million US dollars on the March 16th referendum on whether to join Russia. This came in a statement to the ITAR-TASS correspondent by Crimea’s First Deputy Prime Minister, Rustam Temirgaliyev, earlier today.
“The referendum will cost between 1.5 million dollars and 2 million dollars, with the money to be used for printing ballot papers and technical support for the election”, Temirgaliyev said.
Meanwhile, Chairman of the Crimean Supreme Council, Vladimir Konstantinov, told reporters yesterday that Kiev’s decision to block Crimea’s treasury accounts would not hinder the holding of the referendum, since Crimea has its own funds, its own budget and taxes and, is getting funds from Russia. “So, we’ll have no problems”, he added.
originally posted by: OccamsRazor04
a reply to: Vovin
Completely agree. This is evidenced by the fact that the US got every last oil contract in Iraq, and we made absolutely sure China got none. Of course if China got more than we did that would sort of kill your theory, so good thing it did not happen.
2009[edit]
On June 30 and December 11, 2009, the Iraqi ministry of oil awarded contracts to international oil companies for some of Iraq's many oil fields. The winning oil companies enter joint ventures with the Iraqi ministry of oil, and the terms of the awarded contracts include extraction of oil for a fixed gain of $1.40 per barrel for the oil companies with the remainder going to Iraq.[5][6] The fees will only be paid once a production threshold set by the Iraqi ministry of oil is reached.
Oil fields contracted include the "super-giant" Majnoon Field, Halfaya Field, West Qurna Field and Rumaila Field. The East Baghdad Field, situated in part under Sadr City, did not receive any bids and the Iraqi oil ministry is considering working the field itself. Oil minister Hussein al-Shahristani told Iraqi public television that the increasing oil production "would finance infrastructure projects across Iraq - schools, roads, airports, housing, hospitals". Iraq's oil deposits hold known reserves of 43 billion barrels of crude, as well as large quantities of natural gas.[6]
Pressed from all sides to punish the U.S. for spying, German Chancellor Angela Merkel is standing her ground.
After German authorities exposed two suspected American agents last week, Merkel condemned the activities and asked the U.S. to withdraw the Central Intelligence Agency station chief in Berlin. Her insistence that the affair doesn’t undermine the U.S.’s status as a key partner shows she won’t let it sunder relations with President Barack Obama, even at the risk of bucking public opinion and critics in her governing coalition.
Merkel also defended U.S.-German intelligence sharing, saying Germany needs it in the fight against terrorism. Alleged U.S. spying will have “no impact on the agreements between our intelligence services,” though the two allies need to focus attention on global crisis spots, not on each other, she said.
As spying revelations stoke mistrust of the U.S. in Germany, Merkel cites military cooperation from Afghanistan to Kosovo, the fight against Islamic extremists and commerce as U.S.-German bonds.
U.S. Secretary of State John Kerry and German Foreign Minister Frank-Walter Steinmeier are already talking about how to make up the lost trust.
“The German-American relationship is essential and indispensable and that goes for us both,” Steinmeier told reporters in Vienna on July 13 after talks with Kerry. “We’ll continue to work on our relationship on the basis of trust and mutual respect.”
Germany has criticised Russia for failing to meet commitments to end the violence in eastern Ukraine, and said it might face further EU sanctions.
The warning follows talks between Chancellor Angela Merkel, US President Barack Obama and Ukraine's President Petro Poroshenko.
A spokesman for Mrs Merkel said all three were disappointed by Russia's failure to act.
Most of this fiscal indiscipline is a result of massive defense spending by the US to carry on it's fascistic NWO policies which create mayhem in countries, civil wars, destruction of infrastructures etc. We might even see a new block of Germany-Russia-China to remove Anglosaxon bloc from dominating the world any further.
Even as the dispute boiled over last week, Merkel dismissed a suggestion that the country may scrap negotiations for the Transatlantic Trade and Investment Partnership between the European Union and the U.S.
“We have differing perceptions on the work of intelligence services, but other political areas like the free-trade agreement are absolutely in our interest,” Merkel said. “We work very close together with the Americans. I want that to CONTINUE.”
originally posted by: Xcathdra
Germany says Russia failing to meet Ukraine pledges, hints at sanctions
Germany has criticised Russia for failing to meet commitments to end the violence in eastern Ukraine, and said it might face further EU sanctions.
The warning follows talks between Chancellor Angela Merkel, US President Barack Obama and Ukraine's President Petro Poroshenko.
A spokesman for Mrs Merkel said all three were disappointed by Russia's failure to act.
Lastly, why should Berlin or Paris stand to get nuked or have to fight a war, just because US policy is so belligerent and hyper-spending mode.
Whatever is happening in Ukraine can lead to a horrendous WWIII. Germans, French being local and near will be the first one's to face the Russian nukes.
We might even see a new block of Germany-Russia-China to remove Anglosaxon bloc from dominating the world any further.
Who is behind this NATO expansion and with desires to break Russia into pieces? Not Germans, French or even British !!
a reply to: tsurfer2000h
NATO isn't trying to break Russia into pieces, they are there to keep Russia from doing what it did to Ukraine towards other countries.
BRUSSELS, July 16 (UPI) --The European Union will increase sanctions and stop large-scale funding to Russia in response to support of Ukrainian separatists.
The EU's bank, the European Investment Bank, and the European Bank for Reconstruction and Development, will suspend financing of Russian public-sector projects. It will cut Russia off from a loan of one billion euros ($1.35 billion) promised by the EIB and additional funding from the EBRD, which loaned Russia 1.8 billion euros ($2.43 billion) in 2013.
Read more: www.upi.com...
originally posted by: OccamsRazor04
a reply to: Vovin
Completely agree. This is evidenced by the fact that the US got every last oil contract in Iraq, and we made absolutely sure China got none. Of course if China got more than we did that would sort of kill your theory, so good thing it did not happen.
It also looks like this next round will not target individuals. Construction project funding is suspended and it looks like the possibility of sanctions being placed on defense and financial sectors of the Russian economy.
originally posted by: Vovin
originally posted by: OccamsRazor04
a reply to: Vovin
Completely agree. This is evidenced by the fact that the US got every last oil contract in Iraq, and we made absolutely sure China got none. Of course if China got more than we did that would sort of kill your theory, so good thing it did not happen.
Not at all. Controlling resources is more important than taking the resources.