It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
originally posted by: ~Lucidity
So riddle me this. Why, if they are so weak that all they can do is start proxy wars, are the neo-cons so hell bent on starting a war with them? This ought to be an interesting answer.
originally posted by: ~Lucidity
a reply to: TDawgRex
LOL trust me, dude. I read. And even better, I've been to the Middle East. Three times. Both of which are probablu more than you ever will. But I digress.
So riddle me this. Why, if they are so weak that all they can do is start proxy wars, are the neo-cons so hell bent on starting a war with them? This ought to be an interesting answer.
originally posted by: buster2010
They do keep it in their borders until another nation like America sticks it's nose in where it doesn't belong.
Come to the EU and take a look around.
The Muslims I know who live in my country do not want to integrate, they want the benefits of a modern society sure, but they do not want to live by our laws or accept our cultural identity.
I am very proud of our history, in personal conversations with a Muslim colleague, whom I get on quite well with, he dismissed my point and said "eventually your country will be a Muslim country".
Also, I feel compelled to point out that there is a demographic of members on ATS who perpetually place the US, and her foreign policies etc, at the center of every discussion.
Many nations in the EU support America when we intrude in the politics of these foreign nations.
Boo Hoo come to America and see just how many different cultures we have here.
What religion isn't like that? When they move to another country they want their religion to be the dominate religion and it should rule the land. America has been fighting that battle with the Christians for over a century now.
That's because a majority of the people that post here are American.
originally posted by: TDawgRex
originally posted by: ~Lucidity
a reply to: TDawgRex
LOL trust me, dude. I read. And even better, I've been to the Middle East. Three times. Both of which are probablu more than you ever will. But I digress.
So riddle me this. Why, if they are so weak that all they can do is start proxy wars, are the neo-cons so hell bent on starting a war with them? This ought to be an interesting answer.
Trust me Dude...LOL. Been there myself quite few times.
I hate the American desert and others even more so...especially when they use their sorry excuse for a religion to kill others.
Not to many other religions do that these days except Islam. But please do go on how it is excusable...because they are muslims. I'm waiting.
But in the meantime, may the pigs on my buddies farm, past waste upon the so-called prophets head and eat his entrails. THAT'S how much respect I have for that so called cult at the moment.
When they start to do good...I may just change my mind.
originally posted by: HauntWok
a reply to: FlyersFan
for one, you aren't telling the truth, you are repeating propaganda.
for another the repression your kind and ilk want is to completely "democracy" a culture out of existence.
Don't pretend the popular conservative idea of genocide doesn't apply to the ME just like it applies to the people of south America that your kind wants to kill off completely.
hell conservatives are outright about wiping out the people of the ME.
originally posted by: Snarl
a reply to: Benevolent Heretic
Here's my poke at the question: How do you fight an ideology with weapons? You slaughter everyone you have a doubt in. Seems to be a strategy that's working very well for the Muslim extremists at the moment, too.
Everyone knows that is the proper way to go about it. I have a better solution, which is just as unappealing.
As for the numbers, I don't see them as relevant from the 100,000 ft perspective. The numbers are enough to change the political landscape of an exceptionally large region.
People who thrive on strategic combat have got to be loving this. People who thrive on the value of war will never bring this to a close.
ETA: FWIW, I don't think the numbers are actually that high either. I also don't think all Muslims can be defined as either "extremist" or "not extremist." Muslims are individuals, just like all of us. There may be one small aspect of Islam that they'll take to an extreme and be a moderate on every other 'issue' ... until there's a gun pointed at them, or a gun shoved into their hands.
originally posted by: FlyersFan
originally posted by: DarknStormy
So what? If they want Sharia Law in their countries they should be entitled too it.
They don't keep the bronze age nonsense confined within their borders. The goal is global caliphate with non muslims on the losing end. And considering the extreme ignorance that comes with sharia and caliphate ... it is something that should be of concern to everyone who wants freedom of/from religion and freedom of speech and womens rights.
I’ve got a category (The Tiny Percentage of Radical Islamists) dedicated to posts with that sort of math, and I’m quite sure I wasn’t the first person to think of it. I hope the concept finally gets some traction. Since this study came up with 7% (as opposed to the UK study that came in at 13%), let’s run with those numbers and see if they can be so cavalierly dismissed.
Since it’s unlikely the entire 7% (again, that’s 91 million) of these “political radicals” would actually do anything but grumble amongst themselves about the Great Satan or at most, join Islamic Rage Boy at a flag burning, let’s guess only 7% of them would be willing to perform a terrorist act. That’s 6,370,000 people.
Now lets guess how many would be effective - sticking with the 7%, that’s 445,900 effective terrorists, if the 7% of the 7% of the 7% estimate is accurate.
All of those people aren’t going to have the connections needed to perform a large scale terrorist attack, so take it to the next 7% level. That would be 31,213 political radicals who are willing, can act effectively, and have the connections to conduct a large-scale terrorist attack. All theory, of course. The only number we can be sure of is that 7% in the study who actually admitted their views. But out of 91 million people who believe, I think it’s quite reasonable to conclude that there are 31,000 would would and could act on their beliefs.
originally posted by: Bleeeeep
a reply to: Hongkongphooey
The question was more of a statement: You cannot fight against ideas with weapons. (Think V for Vendetta - the whole concept of the movie was about sparking an idealogical change.) Further, if you try to take out the 20%, or whatever the number is/was, it will only convert more of the 80% because it will appear to the 80% that the 20% were correct. Not only that, but the 20% are family and loved ones to the 80%, whom will be vindictive unless you change their ideology.
originally posted by: motthoople
What a load of hot air spewing from Brigitte, while I don't disagree with everything she says she certainly said it the wrong way. Then she, SHE: Brigitte Gabriel has the nerve to question the U.S. Citizenship of this poor young woman, when ole two-tongue Brigitte didn't even move to the U.S until her late 20's. Give me a break, funny sounding accent she got there for a U.S Citizen isn't it, I didn't realize Lebanon was a burrough of New York.