It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
“Seven samples failed to yield any DNA sequences despite multiple attempts,” the researchers argue.
Using different techniques, most of these were still linked to animals native to the Himalays. But there remains two “anomalies” where DNA and other techniques failed to provide even a hint.
“With the exception of these two samples, none of the submitted and analysed hairs samples returned a sequence that could not be matched with an extant mammalian species,” the researchers write.
originally posted by: kevinp2300
a reply to: daaskapital
The same researchers should come do a study on bigfoot next
"absence of evidence is not evidence of absence"
Although one is reddish brown and the other golden brown, the bear's closest relative turned out to be a precise match for DNA extracted from fossil remains of a polar bear that lived 40,000 years ago. The samples were quite unlike modern polar bears. This raises the intriguing possibility that descendents of a prehistoric polar bear are at large in the Himalayas.
The human-like posture of bears when standing and sitting, and the resemblance of a skinned bear carcass to the human body, have probably contributed to the belief that the spirits of humans and bears were interchangeable.[107] Eskimo legends tell of humans learning to hunt from the polar bear.
originally posted by: ReturnofTheSonOfNothing
originally posted by: kevinp2300
a reply to: daaskapital
The same researchers should come do a study on bigfoot next
"absence of evidence is not evidence of absence"
You could use that same argument on any made up thing you want.
"Don't discount pixies! They could still be out there, since absence of evidence is not evidence of absence!"
In logic, false is a truth value or a nullary logical connective. In a truth-functional system of propositional logic it is one of two postulated truth values, along with its negation, truth.
originally posted by: OrphanApology
a reply to: kevinp2300
Logic requires that if something lacks evidence that the claim is false until proven to be true. Otherwise one would go through life believing in any number of ridiculous claims and fairy tales.
What you have to ask yourself with big foot and yeti "proof" is do you believe it and if not why? That is logic. It may be true or false but it is all we have to sift through information.
Deductive reasoning, also deductive logic or logical deduction or, informally, "top-down" logic, is the process of reasoning from one or more general statements (premises) to reach a logically certain conclusion. Deductive reasoning links premises with conclusions.
originally posted by: OrphanApology
a reply to: 0zzymand0s
But wouldn't a humanoid prehistoric bear be more closely related to apes anyway?
originally posted by: peter vlar
originally posted by: OrphanApology
a reply to: 0zzymand0s
But wouldn't a humanoid prehistoric bear be more closely related to apes anyway?
No, the common ancestor of most carnivores( canines, felines, lions, tigers, bears oh my!) split off about 55-60 MYA going their seperate way from primates as the first prosimians appeared in the fossil record approx. 50 MYA
anthro.palomar.edu...
www.wired.co.uk...