Weird California sighting

a reply to: penroc3

Considering that there is at least one platform that has been flying for 30 years, that had one set of pictures ever taken, since destroyed, and we're at a year and a half on this one, I'm not surprised there aren't any.

I agree though. If I got pics of something the odds are I wouldn't release them either. Sell them back to the government for obscene amounts of money, yes. Release them, probably not.

a reply to: Zaphod58

Agreed plus it's not so cool to release photos of said bird to public if it will compromise her security or mission.

a reply to: BigTrain

What makes you think these uber nerds don't have said pics your pinning for?

Some of us are patriots not traitors. Even the notion to the contrary is insulting.

a reply to: Sammamishman

Patriot versus Traitor is simply a matter of perspective. Theres a very large % of people who think hiding secrets is traitorous.

Plus, whats more traitorous, taking a photo of a green streak flame at night and posting it on the web, or flying a top secret drone around Iran and having it hacked and stolen due to shear incompetence?

Its always the public who are accused of being traitors for their actions, but everyone bats a blind eye at the ones in charge who have sold you and I down the river. 20 Trillion in debt, thats pretty traitorous.

Giving Uranium to North Korea is pretty traitorous. Id say a photo is pretty benign.

The powers that be have convinced you that such small meaningless actions are so evil, yet what they do is 1000000 times worse. Like the solider who mistakingly sent an email through his gmail account to his superior about some issue in Iraq is being drawn up on a court martial but the Queen and her server..... enough said.

Take the photo, post it, its not a big deal, really it isn't. BTW its public anyways, they decide to fly it over your house and you see it. Its in the public realm, theres no expectations of privacy, isn't that what the cops say when you're out in public. See the hypocrisy?

a reply to: BigTrain



just my personal opinion.

damn! how do you have more stars than me?

a reply to: BASSPLYR

There seems to be a direct relationship to registration dates.

one question, all this secrecy is about hide revolutionary advancement in technology or more about international law infringement?.

Im not from the EEUU, but i can understand the emotion and responsability of hide such kind of secret.

a reply to: BigTrain
People are not ready to know a lot of thing , if a day I take a picture of something who look secret , I never put it nowhere .And the mystery occupy our evening speaking about the green fantastic girl its cool no ?

Strange Rumblings Strike Again in the American Southwest

The American Southwest has been recent home to an unexplained series of rumblings, described by some as being similar to earthquakes, which have caused widespread disturbance among residents in the region.
With several incidents now being reported, officials are seeking to understand what might have caused the mysterious shaking which, according to those nearest to the disturbance, is often accompanied by loud booming noises.
Among the most recent reports, a significant booming incident was reported outside of Rainbow Valley, near Phoenix, Arizona, on December 19, 2015. One witness described that the shaking had been so significant that he had gone to observe whether the neighbor’s home nearby had been damaged or destroyed.

The witness’s report details the following:
“Approx 0600 hrs. Dec. 19, 2015, in Rainbow Valley west of Phoenix, AZ. My wife and I were drinking coffee in bed when a large explosion seemed to take place. It felt/sounded like a significant pressure wave hit the east exterior wall of the house, jarring the whole house. I had to get up and check to see if the neighbors house was still there – about 150 yards away – it’s rural.
They’d heard/felt it also. In fact everyone in the area heard/felt it. One person I work with who lives in west Phoenix to the NE of us heard it also.

mysteriousuniverse.org...

a reply to: drwire

This is not the only high speed platform flying. Leaving out B-1s or fighters training, there's at least one high speed platform other than this one that I know for sure is flying.

a reply to: Zaphod58

Zaph, that trio of somethings flying way high and very fast a few weeks ago. Would you include that as one of the Two fast movers your talking about or were those "somethings" something different all together.

a reply to: BASSPLYR

do you have a link to that report i would like to read about what you are talking about

Who has knowledge of this kind of "Black Aircraft"? I just recently read an article on BreakingDefense(breakingdefense.com...), that there are lots of issues with people's whose job is missile defense or other things not having access/clearance for assets that could be useful in their line of work. I assume only those HIGH up in NATO or the pentagon have knowledge of the kind of assets we really have. Even somebody, say in command of ISOF forces in Afghanistan is provably only going to have knowledge of things like a few stealthy UAV platforms or some such. You're not going to use some super-secret Aerospacecraft for interdiction or strike in the Middle East when an F-15/16/18/22 can do the job just fine.

I know that NATO command has different declassification guidelines than the United States, we may see something from them before we see it from the U.S. I know that's how we got the historical Documents on the beginnings of the U.S./NATO nuclear arsenals from 1946-1960s, these would never have been allowed to be released under DOE guidelines.

a reply to: johnthejedi24

Were the F-117 involved in the former Yugoslavia conflict NATO assets or US? It may be the wrong question, but I personally doubt the US would give too much to NATO in terms of super secret aircraft.

Ive said before but the Americans we had at BAE Warton would not do any business with the French around so we had a french office built away from the main business to house the French.

That was about 15 years ago, unless those Americans on site were just industry, I doubt the US would let NATO know what its got in its golf bag at the risk of some untrustworthy members.

a reply to: Forensick

Yep, one was even shot down, and another rumored to have been severly damaged.

originally posted by: Bfirez
a reply to: Forensick

Yep, one was even shot down, and another rumored to have been severly damaged.

The one shot down was flying the exact same route everyday and during daylight hours when it was shot down. it is called a "night hawk" for a reason. the other damaged stealth was a b2 taking off from Guam.

a reply to: yuppa

Meh 1 for 2 ain't bad

a reply to: Bfirez

There was an F-117 that suffered a nose gear collapse at Holloman that is frequently claimed to have been damaged over Yugoslavia and scrapped.

Do some research on the Boscombe Down incident Thats a good rabbit hole to venture down.Brilliant Buzzard that roosts at Groom is another ...

a reply to: Blackfinger

The problem with both of those is what sources to believe. Brilliant buzzard to me is the green lady predecessor. Boscombe down was probably the f117 companion or something along those lines. Any links with more info is much appreciated?