It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.

 

Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.

 

Pyramid Earth

page: 1
5
<<   2 >>

log in

join
share:

posted on Jun, 23 2014 @ 05:13 PM
link   
I will do my best to explain my theory about the true form of our planet. My theory can account for the flat earth theory as well as evolution. It can explain for what we know as magic and matrix glitches that some are in tune with.

To start off i came to this thought by trying to imagine what it would be like to have basically unlimited technology and the need to create or recreate a world or a universe for that matter and it becomes more simple to understand when approaching life as we know it from that angle. I will not have very many answers here but i may be able to outline for some of you a starting point that you may not have known.

It starts with just an asteroid or just a fairly large rock in space and requires a mega computer to do the rest. Now imagine that the surface of that rock in space could be made into anything that we find here on the surface of earth. Sorta like an etch a sketch using the power of a computer to add and take away features as someone seen fit. Now that origional picture or sketch of like can be duplicated over and over again and this would account for expanding earth theory. The evelution could be explained by simply using a default sketch in certain parts of the building.

The top of the pyramid would be that origional sketch and would account for the first life on earth. It is likely to me that the moon could be this rock or first sketch and could be the site of the first people on earth because in order for this to work then every grain of sand here is just duplicated parts projected to form a circle or what we know as the surface of the earth.

I'm gonna stop here and continue to ponder how this place we live could interact with the rest of the universe given that much of the universe was already before us. in other word how GOD could bring all kinds of different creatures from all over to come here and live and how one would go about gathering all the dna necessary to form a human body and why anyone would do that. Like i said i don't have all the answers and probaly could not tell you yet if i did but i think some might be able to see the possibility.



posted on Jun, 23 2014 @ 06:00 PM
link   
a reply to: deadeyedick
Are you bored, why not find some purposeful en-devour to consider rather than trying to enhance childish stories of sky fairies because-YOUR SUBCONSCIOUS MIND IS INTOLERANT OF ACCEPTING THAT YOUR EXISTENCE IS THE RESULT OF COINCIDENTAL OCCURRENCES.
I understand your need for a creator, your subcon's want of a sense of certainty yet trying to mix fantasy with reality without trying to attain a factual outcome is what childhood is for.



posted on Jun, 23 2014 @ 06:14 PM
link   
a reply to: subtopia So do you believe my theory is only in my mind? That means that somewhere it exist. What is a coincidence? Look you do not have to be threatened by my thread. It will be ok. Somewhere inside your mind surely you could begin to understand that it is possible. if not then please tell me what amount of technology would we have to have for you to begi to open your mind to the possibility?
edit on 23-6-2014 by deadeyedick because: (no reason given)



posted on Jun, 23 2014 @ 06:51 PM
link   
dont get me wrong i'm open to any possibility yet i also know that i cannot truly know what i believe, i can believe what i believe but i cannot know what i believe, for once known belief ceases to exist, which is why religions justifiably try and suppress knowledge.

Imagination is the key to humanity yet it needs guidance or it is capable of becoming unbalanced and unnecessarily destructive.



posted on Jun, 23 2014 @ 07:02 PM
link   
a reply to: subtopia Sounds contridictory to your first knee jerk post. Hey i understand your need to feel mentaly superrior to most by way of implying a mindset that is just as dangerous as any religion as a means of countering control of everything. You can hate on religion all you want but it seems that the ability of religion to control minds for so long could be a big clue into the debate of how we got here. Afterall there are other ways to control everything and as we can see in the world around us we tend to describe what we come in contact with on a sub concious level. Everything in history shows that something is steering the way for us that is not subject to time like we are.



posted on Jun, 23 2014 @ 07:02 PM
link   
This op makes no sense at all. Have you seriously read what you just wrote? I don't want to be insulting, but this is not even thought out in a way that is coherent enough for people to make a counter-argument against it. It's just confusing gibberish claiming to be a theory.



posted on Jun, 23 2014 @ 07:29 PM
link   
There is a big difference between just making something up to provide a sense of comfort and certainty and then getting innocent minds to follow to manipulate them and the reasoned pursuit of knowledge where answers can be experienced again and again.
Be mindful of people who try to provide answers that only certain select individuals can experience.
Be mindful of a human imagination that uses only belief as a guide.



posted on Jun, 23 2014 @ 09:00 PM
link   
a reply to: pirhanna It is not insulting what you say and our minds are not used to seeing things from this perspective. Just try to imagine how you could recreate earth using a computer that can minipulate matter.



posted on Jun, 23 2014 @ 09:02 PM
link   
a reply to: subtopia

Beliefs you hold as facts are all you will ever have.



posted on Jun, 23 2014 @ 09:31 PM
link   
if we can imagine a replicator machine in star trek to make a cup of coffee then yes why not be able to upscale it and create an entire planet. The principle is the same. The universe must have an embedded code within it that allows matter to follow a path and be formed into the reality in which we presently exist.

its still the old what came first the chicken or the egg. The creation or its creator

When you see a coral reef spawn after being triggered by a full moon you know the egg came first.

Formation does not require intelligence, just go look at a mountain formed by tectonic plate movement, it maybe beautiful but that does not imply a god created it.



posted on Jun, 23 2014 @ 09:40 PM
link   
a reply to: subtopia Is it easier to imply that every account of majic,aliens, and mysteries that seem to show up all through time would be proof that the human mind has been tricking people into believing a lie or that we have not yet reached the point where tech. makes every unanswered thing possible including recreating everything you see for the right amount of galatic cash?



posted on Jun, 23 2014 @ 09:58 PM
link   
here's hoping I paid to have a gold experience this time. I have put a lot of consideration into this. It would probably distract from the experience if you knew you were paying to have the experience. This is why we value belief, we have to in the absence of knowledge. If everything was known what would be the point of the experience?????



posted on Jun, 26 2014 @ 11:35 AM
link   
Who runs the supercomputer and where does it exist? What created the thing that runs the supercomputer? Isn't this really just another form of the universe is a hologram or simulation theory?



posted on Jun, 26 2014 @ 12:05 PM
link   
a reply to: Krazysh0t I would guess that the computer has replicated itself and resides on every planet that earth has any dna relationship too. I would also tie in haarp to that but do not know why yet. The computer is the sphinx of egypt. Under the right light and frequency you will see something different there.

Just try to recreate everything you see around you using what you think technology can do in the future. You may then see that what came first will be hard to imagine givin that all the different recreations are still out there somewhere and i don't mean out in the stars but somewhere we have not thought of yet.

Hologram and simulation theroies may be part of the truth to but have never been able to account for all other theroies and peoples emotions on the subject. I believe that the reason that everyone gets so caught up in believing their belief is true is because they all are true on some level.

The one that sits on the top of the pyramid is the most high and represents the creator in the flesh but never fully comes into being all knowing and all that while inside himself.




edit on 26-6-2014 by deadeyedick because: (no reason given)

edit on 26-6-2014 by deadeyedick because: (no reason given)



posted on Jun, 26 2014 @ 01:14 PM
link   
a reply to: deadeyedick

So basically, you are trying to say that everything is true and false at the same time? And if someone comes up with a new idea, no matter how crazy or implausible, it is also true and false at the same time? Sounds highly philosophical and unprovable to me.
edit on 26-6-2014 by Krazysh0t because: (no reason given)



posted on Jun, 26 2014 @ 01:19 PM
link   
a reply to: deadeyedick




Hologram and simulation theroies may be part of the truth to but have never been able to account for all other theroies and peoples emotions on the subject.


Say what?

A holgraphic universe or simul;ated universe accounts for everything possiblly concievable by the mind.



posted on Jun, 26 2014 @ 01:24 PM
link   
Well this is possibly the oddest thread I've read on here in quite some time. Bizarre isn't the word.



posted on Jun, 26 2014 @ 01:34 PM
link   
a reply to: InhaleExhale Then perhaps this is just trying to understand the make up of the holo world. So in your opinion do you think that a holo world has limitations? I personally do not see how being just all holographic could account for the realness of where we are and have been to but i will admit that my theory would just be a version of holo world with pyysical matter within that could find a way out.



posted on Jun, 26 2014 @ 01:35 PM
link   
a reply to: deadeyedick

I am having so much trouble trying to grasp what you are saying.




The top of the pyramid would be that origional sketch and would account for the first life on earth. It is likely to me that the moon could be this rock or first sketch and could be the site of the first people on earth because in order for this to work then every grain of sand here is just duplicated parts projected to form a circle or what we know as the surface of the earth.


Say what?

The top of what pyramid, this is the first mention of a pyramid.

Your theory starts of on a asteroid or large rock in space and super computer to do the rest. some mention of etch a sketch. Evolution is explained by using a default sketch in certain parts of the building?

What building?

You can replicate bits of the surface which explain the explanding earth,
but you seem to be forgetting the flat earth theory and how its explained as well,




I'm gonna stop here and continue to ponder how this place we live could interact with the rest of the universe given that much of the universe was already before us. in other word how GOD could bring all kinds of different creatures from all over to come here and live and how one would go about gathering all the dna necessary to form a human body and why anyone would do that.


Yes ponder some more.

Why put limitations on GOD?

Would GOD need to bring all kinds of different creatures from all over?

Ths limits GOD to a being that traveses the universe.



posted on Jun, 26 2014 @ 01:35 PM
link   

originally posted by: subtopia
a reply to: deadeyedick
Are you bored, why not find some purposeful en-devour to consider rather than trying to enhance childish stories of sky fairies because-YOUR SUBCONSCIOUS MIND IS INTOLERANT OF ACCEPTING THAT YOUR EXISTENCE IS THE RESULT OF COINCIDENTAL OCCURRENCES.
I understand your need for a creator, your subcon's want of a sense of certainty yet trying to mix fantasy with reality without trying to attain a factual outcome is what childhood is for.



Really? This post and your responses thereafter are just as childish. If not a bully in a sand pit saying throwing a temper tantrum, "No, No, No" cried the child.

Why even post with a border line narcissistic response? Did the CAPS make you feel empowered? More in control?

It's OP's like this that drive the thought process on the what if(s), what if grandma had balls, she'd be a grandpa the tranny and I still would have loved her!

If your open to "possibilities" it's hard to see, and if it's hard to even distinguish that from your "knee jerk" initial response then you actually don't but want to believe that you do. It's quite a quandary.

Deadeye, I enjoyed your OP and mainly responded to just save a spot and catch up with what else you have to bring to this OP.

Best regards,



new topics

top topics



 
5
<<   2 >>

log in

join