It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
originally posted by: Sharted
I have patients that will testify they see gnomes coming out of their vagina. Is that evidence of it happening? No.
Would they pass the astronaut psychological screening process? There is a big difference between average Joes and astronauts.
originally posted by: game over man
originally posted by: OccamsRazor04
a reply to: Arbitrageur
Anyone who understands science in the least bit will understand reverse-engineering does not work how ATS thinks. If you drop an F-22 in the middle of Ancient Sumeria they aren't going to be able to suddenly have a technology boon. It would mean nothing to them as the technology is way too advanced for them to comprehend.
Likewise the technology supposedly possessed by these craft is so far ahead of us that we would have no clue what is going on. We would not get a sudden tech boom from it.
I kind of disagree on this statement. Our theoretical future space craft are based off of ideas from older sci fi, i.e. Star Trek which is over 50 years old. Roswell happened in 1947, I don't think it would be fair to compare that to an F-22 in Ancient Sumeria. In the 1920's we were firming up on quantum theory I'm sure by 1947 we could investigate an off world craft fairly well.
originally posted by: NoCorruptionAllowed
originally posted by: OccamsRazor04
a reply to: Arbitrageur
Anyone who understands science in the least bit will understand reverse-engineering does not work how ATS thinks. If you drop an F-22 in the middle of Ancient Sumeria they aren't going to be able to suddenly have a technology boon. It would mean nothing to them as the technology is way too advanced for them to comprehend.
Likewise the technology supposedly possessed by these craft is so far ahead of us that we would have no clue what is going on. We would not get a sudden tech boom from it.
I'll bet you have never worked on or in classified projects at all. I have however. While it is true there are many things that we can not duplicate, some have been.
The biggest obstacle that exists at the moment against being able to reverse engineer alternate technology (as we in the skunk works theater call it), is materials science.
Many materials that are found and have already been found, can't be manufactured here on the planet, and our sun can't make any of some elements found because it is not dense enough to fusion down those heavy of elements.
I laugh at your mindset which you think is shielded behind advanced scientific knowledge that you think you have.
Did you know that the United states military has in the past, told a group of new to the team scientists that Russian scientists had cracked the problem of anti gravity tech, making this new team believe without doubt that it was indeed possible? This new team produced some amazing discoveries because they believed it was possible. The results of this I can say nothing further.
You don't even care about science in as much as all you use it for is to try and debunk anything that is not signed off on in the traditional way of approval.
That is about the only pattern that is showing through every single one of your posts.
originally posted by: jonnywhite
a reply to: Sharted
I think most of hte cases you referenced have been systematically explained in painful detail. The ufo market is always producing more cases because that's their job, tha'ts how they make money. Everytime a case is explained, another one is produced. You know the arcade game where everytime you smash one, another pops up? The more I think about ufology, the more I think it's just delusional people wanting to believe in ET's and there's no way to disprove it because another case will always be produced.
Too tired to say anything more. Same ol' slop.
originally posted by: mirageman
originally posted by: Denoli
I just think ufology has gone downhill, years ago I was intrigued by it and thought they was more , let's say better video footage or more convincing evidence but now it's burning out by bs emoter . Now there's more chance of life out there now !my hopes have grown too but the evidence is just not there !
To follow the history of modern Ufology you must follow the pattern of the Cold War and the integration of ever improving technology in our society. As the Cold War ended and the radar, video and surveillance technology improved the number and quality of UFO reports declined. It's not really any coincidence.
originally posted by: OccamsRazor04
originally posted by: Sharted
originally posted by: OccamsRazor04
a reply to: Sharted
Everything you posted is false. His plane was witnessed falling in a spiralling descent and crashing.
Two other pilots also saw the "object" and said it was so small it was difficult to distinguish.
Mantell is the only pilot who continued to climb which explains why he was the only one to black out from lack of oxygen, he did not have an oxygen mask. Also Mantell was not familiar with the P-51 Mustang he was flying.
There was something, whether a planet, or balloon, or other object, but there is nothing at all indicative of ET life. your post is filled with outright lies.
ETA: Just to be a bit more conclusive, the most likely culprit was a balloon from project Skyhook.
Everything I posted was lies, yet you only debunk one case I posted...there are many more cases but I just posted the best ones in my opinion.
And I gave the actual facts which do not at all agree with your post. Your post is flat out wrong. I gave specifics as to why it was wrong, feel free to address it.
originally posted by: OccamsRazor04
originally posted by: Sharted
I have patients that will testify they see gnomes coming out of their vagina. Is that evidence of it happening? No.
Would they pass the astronaut psychological screening process? There is a big difference between average Joes and astronauts.
You mean like Lisa Nowak, high school valedictorian, Naval Academy graduate, test pilot, and NASA astronaut, who had a mental breakdown and murdered someone?
You are right, it's impossible for an astronaut to have any psych issues.
originally posted by: OccamsRazor04
No, only one was low on fuel. None of them including the pilot that crashed had oxygen iirc. It was too dangerous to climb because there is no oxygen, so none of them did, except him, because he was unfamiliar with the P-51 Mustang. Witnesses described watching his plane crash which 100% match a pilot running out of oxygen. Two other pilots saw the "object", and said it was very small, hard to see, and did not appear to be anything special.
The people whose stories I listed above are, to a person, people I would trust looking after my toddler, or tell my secret passwords to, heh... so why would I question their veracity and sanity in this case...especially when I've seen and experienced similar things?
Even if it was wrong, so what? I posted a few of the best ones, in my opinion. If some are inaccurate so what?
One of the most popular questions today is “are we alone in the universe?” Believe it or not, you’re in the minority if you believe that absolutely no intelligent life exists in the universe. In the United States alone, at least half of all Americans say that we’re not alone in the universe. Fifty percent of Americans already believe that there is some form of life on other planets, while only seventeen percent think that there isn’t. A quarter of Americans believe that intelligent extraterrestrial visitors have already come to Earth and have been doing so for a long time. (source)