It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
A San Antonio woman has been sentenced to two years in prison for tearing her 6-year-old son's genitals during a rage and then trying to repair the wound using glue.
The sentence imposed Thursday for 34-year-old Jennifer Vargas includes five years of supervised release. She had pleaded guilty earlier to an assault charge.
An FBI complaint shows Vargas was arrested Sept. 27 at the family's home at Joint Base San Antonio-Fort Sam Houston. It's not clear why Vargas became so angry that she grabbed the boy's genitals.
The father came home later to find his son crying in his room, discovered the wound and took him to a military hospital. The child required surgery.
originally posted by: VoidHawk
If its really as it reads then she'll probably get whats due when in the prison, but there's not much to be gleaned from the linked report. What IF the kid was being a little bra and she just reached out and grabbed whatever part of his clothing she could reach and accidentally caught his bits by mistake?
The gluing was just stupid, someone should open her head an look inside to see if there's a brain in there. But even that reaction (wrong I know) could be because like so many parents these days she was frightened of the authorities.
Agreed, but what if that temper tantrum was being acted out on a table where he was about to fall, would it be ok to grab him then? I know this is unlikely, but there's not enough in the report to rule it out, and we all know how the press like to wind up its readers!
originally posted by: jhn7537
The kid was only 6 years old, he could have been throwing the temper tantrums for all temper tantrums and still putting your hands on your child will never be okay in my book
originally posted by: jhn7537
a reply to: VoidHawk
Well, if she was just sentenced to 2 years in prison I believe all the details were collected. If the scenario you describe was true, I'm sure she wouldn't be heading to prison right now. But if she was trying to save the kid from being hurt and hurt him while doing so then that's a different story, but that doesn't seem to be the case here.
originally posted by: jhn7537
a reply to: VoidHawk
Well, if I'm able to find more information I will share it with this thread. And I do agree that the MSM typically enjoys sensationalizing stories, but I'm not sure if that is the case here. And if the story is as it reads I feel the sentence does not fit the crime and she should be in jail much longer than 2 short years, especially figuring that she's damaged this little boy for good now, both physically and emotionally... I just hate reading/watching the news nowadays, little to no positive stories, and just a bunch of sad, disturbing stories like this...
Is this the new norm? Granted, I'm only 29 years old, but I don't remember news being like this back in the day, but in the 80's/90's I was much younger and not monitoring news sites then like I do now.
The couple later separated, he remarried, and
she later had her son with another man, records show.
with assault causing serious bodily injury after
investigators said she grabbed the boy by his private parts and pulled
with enough force to open a 4-centimeter laceration on his
scrotum.
originally posted by: igloo
a reply to: Libertygal
Brutal and sad story, Libertygal...you should be very proud to have done the right thing. I'm glad it had a happy ending.