It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
It will be our choice to be on top or bottom. There is only one way to be on top and continue to grow and that is through expansion of our way of life.
originally posted by: Nyiah
You can't be serious. Not only are you insinuating there are no starving citizens in this country (look where there is abject poverty, you'll find the starving) But you're also advocating freakin' expansionism? Exactly WTH gives us the right to seize someone else's country to make ourselves feel "productive"? Last I checked, we're no empire, and we're not taking tips from Russia on how to seize anything.
originally posted by: deadeyedick
It will be our choice to be on top or bottom. There is only one way to be on top and continue to grow and that is through expansion of our way of life.
originally posted by: peter vlar
originally posted by: deadeyedick
It will be our choice to be on top or bottom. There is only one way to be on top and continue to grow and that is through expansion of our way of life.
So taking resources from others by force, is to you, a more viable alternative to better utilizing the resources we already has available? I'm just trying to understand the POV you're coming from.
It reminds me of when people scream about drilling for more domestic oil with the false idea that its going to lower domestic oil and gas prices which it won't. Those who will be in charge of the new resources, the corporations,which you covet will reap the rewards and those economics will not trickle down to the lowest economic brackets. Additionally, your plan would inflict additional poverty, death and suffering on wherever you decide to invade for the resources you covet. It just seems like a loose loose long con.
originally posted by: deadeyedick
originally posted by: peter vlar
originally posted by: deadeyedick
It will be our choice to be on top or bottom. There is only one way to be on top and continue to grow and that is through expansion of our way of life.
So taking resources from others by force, is to you, a more viable alternative to better utilizing the resources we already has available? I'm just trying to understand the POV you're coming from.
It reminds me of when people scream about drilling for more domestic oil with the false idea that its going to lower domestic oil and gas prices which it won't. Those who will be in charge of the new resources, the corporations,which you covet will reap the rewards and those economics will not trickle down to the lowest economic brackets. Additionally, your plan would inflict additional poverty, death and suffering on wherever you decide to invade for the resources you covet. It just seems like a loose loose long con.
My point is that taking things by force is what got america to the greatness we achieved. I am not claiming that it is what i would do but that it is the way we got to where we are.
originally posted by: Dicko
Probably rotting away in some dark corner forgotten, ignored. America's dirty little secret!
It is what every american has taken pride in even if they do not realeyes it. When anyone views all the progress made in america and is proud they are reflecting on all the expansion that has been done.
originally posted by: peter vlar
a reply to: deadeyedick
I'm not sure I would call a half a millennia of genoicide the path to greatness.
That is something i wonder too and as the american will to continue expansion toward a one world gov. fades then we will find out because it is just the way things work. dog eat dog world.
originally posted by: angeldoll
a reply to: derfreebie
I wonder when those swollen belly African children, more than halved starved we see on television, flies buzzing around their eyes, and helping agencies begging for 15.00 a month to feed them, I wonder how congress will feel when those are American children's pictures being shown in other countries asking for help to feed them?
Since there are so many so gung-ho on ending the dastardly "entitlement benefits", I wonder how they will feel if/when that happens?