The Elite and its Puppet Show over ISIL and Iraq

Where do the behind the scenes masters feel about Iraq and the mad dogs of ISIL?

Davis Petra says don’t bomb unless Malaki behaves
Petraeus: U.S. Must Not Become the Shia Militia's Air Force www.thedailybeast.com...

The same message that Obama is expressing publicly.

Now this should tell us what the behind the scenes masters are telling these political puppets to say.

Why do I say this?

Because Obama is nothing but a marionette of the hidden hand so literally everything he does is following their orders. Remember him and Hillary’s secret meeting at the 2008 Bilderbergers conference.

Hillary & Obama In Secret Bilderberg Rendezvous http://www.infowars.com/hillary-obama-in-secret-bilderberg-rendezvous/

Now Petraeus is also a puppet. How do I know this? He recently was a big shot at the last Bilderberg conference just a few weeks ago and he also was a big shot at last years conference as well. David Petraeus, The Big Bilderberg Data Spy

Read more at investmentwatchblog.com... pMwD63X.99

He is expressing the same rhetoric as Obama.

Now the other side of the puppet show is led by the mandarin puppet John McCain with the usual left/right good cop/bad cop DEM/GOP war of words, who is advocating the usual GOP: BOMB BOMB BOMB WAR WAR WAR FIRST rhetoric.

John McCain calls for US military intervention in Iraq, wants Maliki to resign
Read more: voiceofrussia.com...

What will happen is Obama’s usual wimpy limp wrist middle course.

...and the torture of the human race will continue

Unless…?

If the "sharks" are running the world and we have very little say as to what goes on, then we may have to choose the lesser evil and let them have their "war" in Iraq. At least it will get the "sharks" off our backs and keep them occupied. Most importantly it will take the focus off manipulating or "punishing" the U.S. population for opposing their plans.

Here are my plans

1. Upgrade the electrical infrastructure of the U.S. to the point where it can provide for ALL of our energy needs, no more reliance on liquid fuel for transporting other sources of energy. This will provide jobs for millions of Americans for decades AND in the end we will have a robust and flexible energy infrastructure capable of supporting economic growth in the time of declining oil reserves and increased demand for energy sources. Remember other highly populous countries are rapidly industrializing, demand for all forms of energy will only increase, without a flexible energy infrastructure economic growth will be difficult for everyone.

2. Cover 200,000+ square miles of low population density American desert with solar panels, this will provide MORE than enough energy to meet all demand in the U.S. This will employ nearly 22 million+ Americans for decades and will make the U.S. completely energy independent, we can sell any remaining sources of energy to other countries, that way we can make a little cash on the side.

3. Create a Hyperloop high speed subway system for the entire U.S., we can even expand this to Canada and Mexico. That way you can work anywhere and live anywhere it is most cost effective, plus it would be fun to "hang out" anywhere in the U.S. no matter where you live. This will employ even more Americans, we will have so many jobs, we may not have enough people to staff them!

So which vision of the future do you find more compelling? More desirable, more profitable, more compassionate, more in keeping with the principles of the U.S.? The track we are on now, or the track outlined above?

Oh yea, one more thing, now that the sharks have gotten their way, we can then turn around and demand the upgrade of the electrical infrastructure. If this is how politics works then, they get their little war and we get the upgraded electrical infrastructure and hyperloops everywhere.

a reply to: Willtell

Because Obama is nothing but a marionette of the hidden hand so literally everything he does is following their orders.

Not hating on you here, but how is this different than any other president? The president has power, but in a very limited scope. There are a few issues the President get's to focus on during his presidency, but 99% of his decisions are already made for him.

a reply to: deloprator20000

no; that would require congress to agree on raising taxes on the people who got them into office (the wealthiest americans).

You'd see fox news and all the right-wingnut-o-sphere screaming about class warfare and tyranny and all sorts of #.

You'd see congressmen not passing any bill for public infrastructure, rather just the military thing, why? because patriotism.

a reply to: Euphem

I’m just making the objective, as I see it, point.
That’s why I called it a puppet show...with dummies: the characters; strings attached: the boons like money, power and glory they all get; and the curtain: the supine press and the clueless public...

a reply to: Willtell

Funny ISIS storms into the scene from out of nowhere and takes over 3 iraqi cities in 3 days....and 800 of them routed 2 iraqi army units (trained by the US, with US equipment) numbering 30,000.

Are these ISIS guys ninjas? Xmen?

#18

a reply to: Willtell

Oh I see,some people give $$ and passport them to do that ah...

Hey~want to see new weapons to help you get 72 virgins ?

originally posted by: reploid
a reply to: Willtell

Funny ISIS storms into the scene from out of nowhere and takes over 3 iraqi cities in 3 days....and 800 of them routed 2 iraqi army units (trained by the US, with US equipment) numbering 30,000.

Are these ISIS guys ninjas? Xmen?

#18

Worth considering that ISIS at one point fought along side the FSA until they became a splinter group and left Al-Qaeda....."allegedly". There are also allegations that ISIS is a fake front comprised of foreign fighters (CIA hallmark) and began to withdraw without a fight against The FSA around the beginning of this year. Suddenly, as if from nowhere they form a stronghold in Syria's northern border and surge into Iraq toppling one city after another. This after Iraq's army having been trained by US personnel for a decade? Than who the hell trained or is leading ISIS? ....*ponders a minute*

Maliki doesn't appear to be behaving like a good client state which gives the west an opportunity to punish Maliki for playing ass-goose with Iran and providing justification to re-invade Iraq. By doing this they have justification to attack the enemy wherever they are harboring. In this case Syria.....how convenient. Oh did I mention ISIS are foreign fighters.....