It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
originally posted by: stumason
originally posted by: theabsolutetruth
I think it wouldn't be in any way representative, given that most of ATS are US based, additionally it would be more than tedious to get stats from it.
I would imagine it would also be heavily distorted due to the general "anti-west", "anti-British" sentiment to found on here, not to mention the propensity of Americans in particular to equate the Scottish referendum with Braveheart and the "oppressive English" without having the slightest understanding of the History behind the Union.
originally posted by: angelchemuel
a reply to: uncommitted
I take it by your last post then that yours would be a resounding NO on an ATS poll then?
You are also forgetting that there are plenty of english and other foreign nationals being allowed to vote IN SCOTLAND about the future of the country they are currently residing in, and many, many more Scots all over the world (who hold UK passports) who are working etc who are also being denied a vote on their home country which they in all likely hood will be returning to.
It's the fairest way to allocate who gets to vote.
Rainbows
Jane
originally posted by: uncommitted
As for your point about a wider community, fat fish and squeeky fish won't let English people voice an opinion without labelling them as haters.
originally posted by: eletheia
originally posted by: uncommitted
As for your point about a wider community, fat fish and squeeky fish won't let English people voice an opinion without labelling them as haters.
LOL... LOL ...(How I miss that rolling - laughing emo.)
Not very subtle .... but extremely funny!
originally posted by: TonyS
a reply to: beansidhe
one problem might be that a large number of ATS members like me wouldn't participate because they recognize their distance from the subject and the fact they'd likely make a bad decision because they can't get quality information about the forces at play in this. It strikes me as being exceptionally localized and therefore remote to those of us who haven't lived in the situation.