It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
originally posted by: mikegrouchy ...
Any serous UFOlogist would start pressing against lense sizes in telescopes. I mean personally I'm tired of seeing film of planets and moons. Would be nice to see the hobby of amateur astronomy start making some progress. What about the geostationary satellites. Where are the pictures of these.
originally posted by: JimOberg
Sounds like you better visit www.satobs.org and see what the amateurs have been up to -- lots!!
originally posted by: mikegrouchy
originally posted by: mikegrouchy
That satellite would have to be pretty low for any Amateur Astronomer to see.
The sky is just that damn big, and the amateur telescopes that small.
Satellites are just out of reach of most things below 60 inches, their magnitudes are atrocious, and if they are not in a close earth orbit the problem just gets exponential.
originally posted by: Rob48
If I lie on a lawn chair in my garden at night I can see dozens of satellites passing over with nothing but a pair of Mk1 Baby Blues, and I live in the light-polluted southeast of England.
/sarcasm
Omg this is the best news ever!
Now I can take the gloves off and just start slapping amateur astronomers around for NOT getting us pictures of Earth orbiting satellites.
/end sarcasm
Has anyone seen any pictures yet.
Other than a single streak across a field of stars.
How did they solve the tracking problem?
Mike
originally posted by: mikegrouchy
originally posted by: mikegrouchy
That satellite would have to be pretty low for any Amateur Astronomer to see.
The sky is just that damn big, and the amateur telescopes that small.
Satellites are just out of reach of most things below 60 inches, their magnitudes are atrocious, and if they are not in a close earth orbit the problem just gets exponential.
originally posted by: Rob48
If I lie on a lawn chair in my garden at night I can see dozens of satellites passing over with nothing but a pair of Mk1 Baby Blues, and I live in the light-polluted southeast of England.
/sarcasm
Omg this is the best news ever!
Now I can take the gloves off and just start slapping amateur astronomers around for NOT getting us pictures of Earth orbiting satellites.
/end sarcasm
Has anyone seen any pictures yet.
Other than a single streak across a field of stars.
How did they solve the tracking problem?
Mike
originally posted by: Phage
a reply to: Arken
Ok.
And... self-references posts have no value.
The claim that there were no polar orbiting satellites is false.
nssdc.gsfc.nasa.gov...
Discoverer 2 was a cylindrical satellite designed to gather spacecraft engineering data and to attempt ejection of an instrument package from orbit for recovery on Earth. The spacecraft was launched into a 239 km x 346 km polar orbit by a Thor-Agena A booster. The spacecraft was three-axis stabilized and was commanded from Earth. After 17 orbits, on 14 April 1959, a reentry vehicle was ejected.
There were others after that, part of the Corona program.
The Black Knight is a fine tale. Combining a variety of distorted facts along with outright fiction.
originally posted by: FinalCountdown
originally posted by: Phage
a reply to: Arken
Ok.
And... self-references posts have no value.
The claim that there were no polar orbiting satellites is false.
nssdc.gsfc.nasa.gov...
Discoverer 2 was a cylindrical satellite designed to gather spacecraft engineering data and to attempt ejection of an instrument package from orbit for recovery on Earth. The spacecraft was launched into a 239 km x 346 km polar orbit by a Thor-Agena A booster. The spacecraft was three-axis stabilized and was commanded from Earth. After 17 orbits, on 14 April 1959, a reentry vehicle was ejected.
There were others after that, part of the Corona program.
The Black Knight is a fine tale. Combining a variety of distorted facts along with outright fiction.
Wow si quick to drop a load on this thread.
Who do you work for?
originally posted by: mikegrouchy
For stuff like this!? If the entire internet still looked like this, it wouldn't be widely used. And besides....
/queue Yoda voice
A photograph of a satellite, this is not
/end Yoda voice
Mike Grouchy