It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
originally posted by: neo96
a reply to: Baddogma
True, that traditional farming methods hasn't a hope of feeding the swarming masses... and Monsanto has been instrumental in increasing yield, but using highly toxic, long stable compounds that saturate everything is not a solution in the long term.
Says a group of people who want to turn the agriculture industry back to the 'stone age'.
That is motivated by a political agenda.
Monsanto isn't the only GMO producer, or pesticide producer in the world.
Because the masses care more about the Kanye West marriage than they care about their air, water and food quality. Have another Big Mac and Diet Coke with me and watch the world burn.
Here is a thought go talk to farmers.
The study, published Dec. 7 in the medical journal Cancer, used data collected from 2001-2006 to analyze trends of cancer deaths and new cancer diagnoses. Data for the study was obtained from the National Cancer Institute. According to the Department of Health, Mississippi ranked fourth in cancer mortality in 2005.
originally posted by: InverseLookingGlass
a reply to: Corruption Exposed
Would Monsanto benefit from a Libertarian led US government? I'm reading they would like to eliminate the EPA and FDA. Rand Paul has talked a little about this.
I wonder when corporates really start getting behind Libertarian candidates? Ayn Rand would not have a problem drinking Roundup. The strong would survive.
originally posted by: chiefsmom
Here is a thought go talk to farmers.
Neo,
Been there, did that. Six large scale farmers in our area. Every one of them is concerned about what is going in the ground and our wells. Did you know that in some communities, farmers are only offered round up ready seeds? No choice given.
There is a current push right now by the local farmers, to the mills, to at least offer natural, or organic seeds. Why is that graineries aren't even given choices, when customers are asking for them?
Farmers today, at least around here, have evolved. They do know smarter, more economical ways of farming, than the folks from the 30's. And when a farmer tells me, they know there is a problem, I listen. And the older ones, who are now questioning some of their health issues, after using some of these chemicals for 30 years? It makes me wonder as well.
I don't say it is just Monsanto. But they sure spend the most money, telling everyone everything is safe, and buying officials.
Why is that?
originally posted by: InverseLookingGlass
a reply to: Corruption Exposed
Ayn Rand would not have a problem drinking Roundup. The strong would survive.
originally posted by: neo96
a reply to: Baddogma
but making it less about profits and more about long term goals and health would point us towards enclosed hydroponic high yield complexes, for instance, where toxins wouldn't be necessary.
I am here to say 1930 yields can't and will never pay for current land prices, or machinery costs, or fuel costs or keep pace with future growth.
Profit is already small for agriculture.
The only things that is sustaining agriculture is gmo, and 'roundup'.
Take either or away and that is also she wrote.
The only difference is we will be eating gmo and food that has been dosed with pesticides from Sygenta, and the runner up IMPORTED from elsewhere.
Especially the source:
'EcoWatch' eh !
US National Library of Medicine National Institutes of Health
originally posted by: Corruption Exposed
a reply to: neo96
Is Monsanto the only source that you will accept as credible?
Syngenta AG is a global Swiss agribusiness that markets seeds and agrochemicals. Syngenta is involved in biotechnology and genomic research. It was formed in 2000 by the merger of Novartis Agribusiness and Zeneca Agrochemicals. The company was ranked third in total seeds and biotechnology sales in 2009 in the commercial market.[2] Sales in 2013 were approximately US$ 14.7 billion. Syngenta employs over 28,000 people in over 90 countries. Over half of the sales are in Emerging Markets.[1] Syngenta is listed on both the Swiss stock exchange and in New York.[1]
The National Grain and Feed Association (NGFA) estimated in a report that rejections of shipments containing Syngenta AG's Agrisure Viptera corn resulted in losses of at least $1 billion, based on an economic analysis that included data supplied by top global grain exporters.
More than 40 years ago, Agent Orange was one of 15 herbicides used by the U.S. military as a defoliant in the Vietnam War to protect and save the lives of U.S. and allied soldiers. It was a unique mixture of two common herbicides (2,4-D and 2,4,5-T ) that had been used separately in the United States since the late 1940s. The government named the mixture “Agent Orange” because of the orange band that was painted on containers of the material.
From 1965 to 1969, the former Monsanto Company was one of nine wartime government contractors who manufactured Agent Orange. The government set the specifications for making Agent Orange and determined when, where and how it was used. Agent Orange was only produced for, and used by, the government.
www.monsanto.com...
You wonder why people pick on Monsanto?
I hate to break it to everyone, but since the dawn of agriculture all over the globe mankind has ALWAYS 'genetically' modified their food source because mother nature doesn't cut it.