Total Biscuit's - Atheism does not make you clever

originally posted by: undo
a reply to: vethumanbeing

actually, total biscuit (who's real name i dunno) is an internet personality who got famous for his world of warcraft videos on youtube.

You are trying to relate what exactly; give me a clue. Is it that Total biscuit is indeed NOT Edward Snowden, a static Guy Fawkes Mask worn by (ala infamous 'anonomous' hackers acclaim no shows) or Sasha Cohen disguised as an Einstein caliber atheist lawyer posing/hiding out somewhere between Harberofshadows ears. Read the first 7 pages.

a reply to: undo
It is possible that if we were beings that could live in temperatures below 0 Kelvin. Relating to ourselves as in "consensus", would be much easier.

Its going to take more time to relate to ourselves in consensus that what was expressed in hypothesis above.

Due to a variance in Density.

Any thoughts?

originally posted by: vethumanbeing

originally posted by: undo
a reply to: vethumanbeing

actually, total biscuit (who's real name i dunno) is an internet personality who got famous for his world of warcraft videos on youtube.

You are trying to relate what exactly; give me a clue. Is it that Total biscuit is NOT Edward Snowden, a Guy Fawkes Mask (ala infamous hackers acclaim) or Sasha Cohen disguised as an Einstein caliber atheist lawyer posing/hiding out somewhere between Harberofshadows ears.

nothing cryptic here. this harbinger guy says he appreciates the commentary of total biscuit so he brings it here and posts it for the debate that will ensue. i dunno if he is total biscuit himself. but total biscuit, i've been listening to his wow youtubes for a couple years at least, so i know he's not an imaginary guy that harbinger made up unless harbinger is total biscuit.

a reply to: Toadmund

no we do not need to get rid of differing opinions. otherwise, we are a homogenous goop with no variance.

originally posted by: Kashai
a reply to: undo
It is possible that if we were beings that could live in temperatures below 0 Kelvin. Relating to ourselves as in "consensus", would be much easier.

Its going to take more time to relate to ourselves in consensus that what was expressed in hypothesis above.

Due to a variance in Density.

Any thoughts?

we don't need a consensus reality. even basic humanities will teach you that.
consensus reality stifles everything.

a reply to: Kashai
As far a temperature ratio goes look at the responses. I stopped taking this thread as being possibly life/soul harming or threatening 'fear/seriousness/jokes on you' seriously at page 8. Paranoid? no, just a waste of everyones time and I dislike seeing others clear thought/emotions being used so flagrantly for entertainment (laughing into ones pillow result).

a reply to: vethumanbeing
Irrelevant, I really do not care if the OP was prepared by JZ while Beyoncé was looking over his shoulder.

a reply to: vethumanbeing
I feel you response in page 8 is an expression of paranoia.

With all due respect you are entitled to your opinion.

Any thoughts?

a reply to: undo

Based upon what evidence?

originally posted by: Kashai
a reply to: undo

Based upon what evidence?

the dark ages.
communist russia.
pol pot's cambodia.
mao's china.
cuba.
south africa.

a reply to: undo
During the Dark Ages if you were a commoner (whether male or female) and your shadow touched what could be today the equivalent of a Police Officer?

They had every right to kill you.

During the Mongolian invasion of Europe if you said no to a Mongolian Warrior. The next thing that would happen is that in roughly, 1/3 of a second after you said "No"?

You would see your intestines on the ground just in front of your feet.

This is because the Mongol Warrior had drawn his sword and sliced you in the area of your body, where gravity would do the rest.

What about a Roman Warrior in this regard as they existed earlier in History?

What about human life before that?

Any thoughts?

originally posted by: Kashai
a reply to: vethumanbeing
I feel you response in page 8 is an expression of paranoia.

With all due respect you are entitled to your opinion.

Any thoughts?

You are the psychiatrist page 8 specialist (with all due respect )and will allow me to fill out that prescription pad diagnosis ?. It follows as this: Kashai gets 100mg of "Singular Awareness" twice a day, "Zombie Id Idea combatant" once a day, 30 minutes before consuming human flesh. HEY Nice snappy retort to UNDO one post up, dictators need to be made into jello molds and let melt in the sun or be blown up with fireworks.

a reply to: Kashai

that's precisely my point. consensus reality, whether enforced by law or not, stifles everything. it takes many different kinds of people, from many different types of backgrounds with many different ways of approaching science, for example, to create new things, broaden the boundaries of science, and so on.

originally posted by: Kashai
POST REMOVED BY STAFF?

Cortez obviously was LOST and instead of admitting he never landed in Cornwall England (his true destination ) seeking the same spoils of the Norsemen/Saxons/Normans many years TOO late fabricated this idea of the conquering the Aztecs when in fact drifted up on mezoAmerican shores and accidently killed them with disease brought from Europe.
1400AD was after my time as I was Ancient original Maya, I was long gone (around 0AD) after birthing the idea of Christ Concsiousness in the Temple of the Sun "avenue of the Gods in Teotihuacan". See, the plan was to get this 9 dimensional being ready to incarnate; you wouldn't think this would work as it was to happen physically in Judea of all places; but entirely necessary to incubate in Mexico (outside of the Roman/Jewish rule dogmas). My thoughts? what is an @@@^ &0%#? A new specie of grasshopper?

a reply to: undo

A point in context to the thought experiment of life forms that could be as intelligent as us and survive in a 0 kelvin environment?

Is essentially a matter inexorably Interrelated to the issue of "Decoherence in Physics". When Scientist who support the conclusion that Consciousness created reality. They are presenting that this issue of "Decoherence" is a matter that results from the ability of science, to comprehend, as how we are actually interrelated.

Science is in its infancy as a social phenomenon and in result there is no reason to treat it as a Pillar, that comprehends if or not God exists.

Any thoughts?

a reply to: HarbingerOfShadows
I saw this floating around on the board yesterday. I wish I would have peaked in on it then instead of waiting.
I don't know who this TB fellow is but he and I think a lot a like.
I have been known to say "what we currently know is only a drop in the ocean of knowledge still to learn".
I don't understand how people can so haphazardly claim to know anythin for sure.
I have an open mind and I let my experiences guide me.
Things have happened in my life that can not be explained by science (as of yet), therefore I have a beief in God.
My faith is my own, my beliefs are my own. I can tell you about them but I would never force them on you.
What if more people were this way?
What would we be able to accomplish if we put our differences aside and worked together?
Ahhhhh well, a fella can dream can't he?

a reply to: undo

In presentation I would point out that due to Density in respect to the Periodic table, Decoherence is a Relative value.

In a altogether way.

Any thoughts?

Also, in relation to what we think today as important?

It could be considered potentially equivalent to a cave painting to people alive in 30,000 years.

In a literal sense as we look at humans who existed 30,000 years ago, for the sake of discourse, their could in fact be very little difference.

As to how humans relate to us today in 30,000 years.

Any thoughts?

originally posted by: Toadmund

originally posted by: EnPassant

originally posted by: AfterInfinity

originally posted by: EnPassant
a reply to: Toadmund

And how does one identify an experience as being one from god?

Only by living a moral life and developing awareness of God.

What is God?

God is being, life.

Any better explanation than that?

My creator is the Universe, hence:
Universe is being, life.

Is that satisfactory to you? Does that explain the Universe, our creator?

In Neoplatonism, creation is an expression of God. God contains all possibilities. Creation is the self of God. God is the source of all that is.