It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
This is a very purposeful leak from the files of Russian intelligence. It was brought to me because no one else would understand its implications or publish it.
The bunk here is twofold: Firstly there are not 70,000 cancer victims. That's an entirely made up number. The NY Post story cited gives figures of: nypost.com...
o the PressTV article is total nonsense. There are not 70,000 cancer victims. There's only about 1,100. And of those, only about 200 might possibly be due to exposure of something at ground zero, and of those 200, none are thought to be from exposure to radiation. PressTV and Gordon Duff are clearly just writing baseless nonsense for propaganda purposes.
Toxic dust. The head of the EPA should have been taken out and shot for saying that the dust from 9/11 was safe. It wasn't. Asbestos and all kinds of very nasty stuff was in that dust. Nothing to do with radiation. - See more at: www.abovetopsecret.com...
Of 622 cancer claims approved so far, the fund has awarded $15.5 million to 39 victims, a spokeswoman told The Post. Officials would not give a breakdown of cancer victims, but 10,800 downtown workers make up the second-largest group of registered claimants after 39,500 Ground Zero responders. There are another 16,600 in smaller categories such as residents, students, child-care and health-care workers.
Yet some officials were worried about making the connection between 9/11 and cancer too soon. When the proposal to add cancer coverage was made, experts estimated the cost would total between $14.5 million and $33 million. And while someone's cancer may have been caused by his or her work at ground zero, it might also have been a coincidence -- they may have gotten cancer anyway.
So the PressTV article is total nonsense. There are not 70,000 cancer victims. There's only about 1,100. And of those, only about 200 might possibly be due to exposure of something at ground zero, and of those 200, none are thought to be from exposure to radiation.
originally posted by: Salander
a reply to: cantonear1968
No, it's not just made up by Fetzer, it is REPORTED by Fetzer and others.
The Zadroga Bill was a formal acknowledgment by the authorities that the situation existed. Close examination of the data shows the epidemiology to be very similar to that found at Chernobyl, Nagasaki and Hiroshima. Before long, Fukushima.
originally posted by: BGTM90
These towers had tons of asbestos that was literally turned to dust and spread over the city. There is no evidence of fission or fusion based nuclear weapons on the site, first of all there would have been a very bright light at the moment of detonation thats also one of the reasons I do not believe in the thermite theory thermite burns white hot and you just don't see any evidence of that.
originally posted by: Salander
a reply to: cantonear1968
A good place to start is with Jeff Prager's ebook, America Nuked, or something like that.
Unfortunately, it is not available in print form, at least to my knowledge. It took forever to read the ebook, but it is very well documented.
originally posted by: douglas5
originally posted by: BGTM90
These towers had tons of asbestos that was literally turned to dust and spread over the city. There is no evidence of fission or fusion based nuclear weapons on the site, first of all there would have been a very bright light at the moment of detonation thats also one of the reasons I do not believe in the thermite theory thermite burns white hot and you just don't see any evidence of that.
Have a watch of this yt clip for metal running at 2000 degrees for 8 weeks later