Last manned mission to the moon? 1972. Really!!

Don't tell me there is nothing more to find on the moon for science.
42 years. No missions with humans aboard. It doesn't make sense. Don't say it does.
Two possible answers.
Moon flight with humans? Fake. (unlikely but not impossible)
ETs said, Stop!

Or the cost doesn't warrant what they know the reward will be.

a reply to: opethPA

Cost seems to be no problem. If they want it to happen, it will happen. The question is, who is they.

a reply to: droid56

Too expensive!

NASA wasted so much money going there again and again, in all 7 times. This consumed NASA's budget and there was real no benefit to going 7 times, 9 times if you count the two that went and did not land.

To do so now would be very expensive at a time when the US is broke.

No other country wants to do it since there is no real prestige left unless you want to set up a Lunar colony and quite frankly, why would you want to?

If countries want to do something in space, it would be for prestige and would be landing on Mars as the next logical step.

P

That's one thing YOU will never know.....Move along!

42 years. Think about it!

a reply to: droid56

Or they can do the same thing with a remote vehicle cheaper and without risking lives again and can do more now with technology from earth and a space station in orbit. I would venture to say we know more about the moon than we do about whats beneath the ocean here on earth.

Remote vehicle on the moon. Is it there.

a reply to: droid56

Uhh there have been dozens of missions to the moon since the last manned mission.

Rovers, landers, orbiters, impacters, the whole lot from multiple countries including the US, Russia, China and Japan.
en.wikipedia.org...

Why no manned missions since 1972.

Why would you put a man on the moon instead of a rover? What possible benefit is there? OP is seriously deluded.

a reply to: droid56

Perhaps no more people on the moon because there are things that people blab about, and machines dont blab. Could be that.

2.3 trillion missing dollars just in one year could cover a manned moon mission but you'd never know what that was stolen for.

Why no other country's have manned missions to the moon is another question.

But whatever the reason there will be those who disagree and agree to the reason. Dont stop asking questions though, truth turns up eventually even if its a 100 years

originally posted by: GallopingFish
a reply to: droid56



Perhaps no more people on the moon because there are things that people blab about, and machines dont blab. Could be that.



2.3 trillion missing dollars just in one year could cover a manned moon mission but you'd never know what that was stolen for.



Why no other country's have manned missions to the moon is another question.



But whatever the reason there will be those who disagree and agree to the reason. Dont stop asking questions though, truth turns up eventually even if its a 100 years

If you want to explore the ocean do you send a person who needs air and food or an unmanned sub that can stay down for years?

a reply to: GallopingFish

2.3 trillion missing dollars just in one year could cover a manned moon mission but you'd never know what that was stolen for.

That would certainly cover it but you would need to get your fact straight on that claim.
2.3 trillion dollars is the entire defense budget for 3 years. 2.3 trillion dollars is 60% of the entire annual budget. If that amount went missing in a year it would sort of shut things down.


But again, what's the point of landing people on the Moon? A manned base does make some sense but it is a great deal more complex and difficult than safely landing men on the the Moon for a day or two then bringing them back. Supply difficulties. Long term radiation exposure. It's a tough one.

a reply to: Phage

Who cares..what us in the USA says is mute. It all comes down to war. It's all I've ever lived for. Now to make this line rhyme..I'd have to think back u=in time. I could go way back or not..it really doesn't matter or not. It is what it is. Just go to work each day or do what you do. Those that run things will do it for you

originally posted by: opethPA
Or the cost doesn't warrant what they know the reward will be.

Ah we come back to that word "cost", yet we know that TPTB's game of making us earn and use money that never was theirs or real in the first place.

Cost is never an issue with the elites of this world!

a reply to: skyblueworld
Why would the elites want to do more Moon landings?

originally posted by: skyblueworld

originally posted by: opethPA

Or the cost doesn't warrant what they know the reward will be.

Ah we come back to that word "cost", yet we know that TPTB's game of making us earn and use money that never was theirs or real in the first place.



Cost is never an issue with the elites of this world!

That doesn't answer why we would want to send a person instead of a rover. So .. why?

originally posted by: Phage
a reply to: skyblueworld
Why would the elites want to do more Moon landings?

Who said they never? Hand on heart who actually believes anything they ever say?. Around 1% of the worlds richest own about 50% of the economy, they have had the money to do whatever they want.

Why do they allow secret society's to run and own country's? because secrecy is the main key here with TPTB.

I can tell you this! I've been to china lake, Fallon Nevada., Nas Lemoore, and I could go on. You Folks ain;t going to know nothing. Evwn Snowden, can't know all. It is that way. That is how it is. It is USA don't mess with me lol!! I'm telling you!! lol!!