posted on May, 19 2014 @ 02:39 PM
I think the OP asks a fair question. We have directly conflicting autopsy reports from the authorities, a hat with a tiny hole and lack of blood and
tissue incompatible with a bullet traversing 2 layers of skull bone and DNA evidence that casts doubt on the entire OS.
Add to this a complete lack of motive, no prior history of violent behavior (not even so much as punching a wall) and a complete black hole concerning
the last 2 years of his life. I concede Adam may have hated school that does not translate to wanting to slaughter 6 year olds.
If the actions at Sandy Hook were so cut and dry why were there so many changes in the story concerning not only who did it, but who died and what
they were shot with. I could chock up 1, perhaps 2 things of such importance to a "get it on the new first" mentality but all 3? Not just one
change either, each of them were changed multiple times. That is simply inconsistent with any real event where the names of the deceased don't change
and the guns they were shot with don't transform into entirely different firearms altogether. This all speaks to me of outside meddling, the
squabbling of agencies to present the story they want presented and perhaps even a political agenda that needed accommodating.
I think it's tragic our government and media can declare someone a mass murderer and not be required to substantiate their claims in any way. Prove
to me Adam Lanza murdered those children and I will believe it too. Until then I'm of the opinion he made a convenient patsy to bear the blame.
Imagine if your son or brother were accused of something so monstrous.
Would you believe it without evidence?
(which is another reason I'm very unsure about who Peter and Ryan Lanza actually are - neither of them seemed surprised Adam could do this and
neither has even contested it by saying "are you sure? Adam would NEVER do something like that". You know, things a normal family might say.