It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
originally posted by: Bilk22
Can you post a link to a site like photobucket where a larger version can be inspected? The pics this site hosts are pretty worthless as they are way to small to glean anything meaningful.
originally posted by: gwynnhwyfar
a reply to: htapath
Interesting picture! Bird caught while wings were flapping down? Falling space debris? Did you notice anything moving at the time?
originally posted by: breathe
if it were a bird, it would have to be enormous.look at the road sign. Compare the two and the object in the sky would have to be huge I'm sure.
There is a story that in April 1890, two cowboys in Arizona killed a giant birdlike creature with an enormous wingspan. It was said to have had smooth skin, featherless wings like a bat and a face that resembled an alligator. This description has some similarity to that of a prehistoric pterodactyl, an animal whose existence was known at the time. They are supposed to have dragged the carcass back to town, where it was pinned with wings outstretched across the entire length of a barn. A picture of this event may have been published in the local newspaper, the Tombstone Epitaph. Cryptozoology.com has an account of this story with the events taking place in the state of Texas.[2]
According to Mark Hall, the Epitaph did indeed print a story about the capture of a large, unusual winged creature, on April 26, 1890. Beyond this single story, however, no one has made historic corroboration that this event ever occurred; it is usually considered an urban legend. Utterly fictional tall tales were not an uncommon feature in newspapers during this era.[3]
No one has ever produced a copy of the "Thunderbird" photograph, though numerous people, Ivan T. Sanderson being one of the better known, have made claims to its existence. Sanderson claimed to have once owned a copy of the photo, which vanished after he loaned it to an acquaintance in the 1960s. The television program Freaky Links staged a similar photo, giving new life to the "Thunderbird Photograph" legend.[4]
Jerome Clark speculates that the description of the basic image in question (men standing alongside a winged creature nailed to a barn), is evocative enough to implant a sort of false memory, leading some people to vaguely "remember" seeing the photo at some distant, imprecise time.[5]
originally posted by: draknoir2
originally posted by: htapath
a reply to: Mianeye
That would have to be an extremely large bird! Larger than a 747 in my estimation.
Exactly how do you figure that?
Doesn't look that distant to me.
originally posted by: htapath
originally posted by: draknoir2
originally posted by: htapath
a reply to: Mianeye
That would have to be an extremely large bird! Larger than a 747 in my estimation.
Exactly how do you figure that?
Doesn't look that distant to me.
It's as high as the clouds man..
originally posted by: draknoir2
originally posted by: breathe
if it were a bird, it would have to be enormous.look at the road sign. Compare the two and the object in the sky would have to be huge I'm sure.
The road sign isn't "huge", and I don't see any reason why the object can't be closer than the sign. Might be a vulture, which could be larger than the sign.
Anyway, THIS, or TH IS is kind of the position I was thinking of.
Can't zoom in close enough to say for sure it's a large bird, but it certainly could be.
originally posted by: lemmin
a reply to: htapath
Did you take any more pictures?
Are we supposed to believe that you saw a UFO, took out your camera for a picture, then just moved on? How can a picture taken in that scenario ever be credible? I personally would take as many pictures/videos as I could until the object was no longer visible.
Also, ATS doesn't resize photos; the picture is available if you link to it:
Full size on ATS
You can also just right click the embeded image and select "View Image."
originally posted by: draknoir2
originally posted by: htapath
originally posted by: draknoir2
originally posted by: htapath
a reply to: Mianeye
That would have to be an extremely large bird! Larger than a 747 in my estimation.
Exactly how do you figure that?
Doesn't look that distant to me.
It's as high as the clouds man..
It's clearly not, man.
And I've looked at the full image.
originally posted by: htapath
a reply to: Mianeye
That would have to be an extremely large bird! Larger than a 747 in my estimation.
originally posted by: breathe
if it were a bird, it would have to be enormous.look at the road sign. Compare the two and the object in the sky would have to be huge I'm sure.
originally posted by: Mianeye
a reply to: htapath
Bird perhaps, caught in the moment the wings flaps down.