It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
originally posted by: SkepticOverlord
An interesting tidbit.
We only have nine votes from Malaysia at this point. But all nine have picked: "It was hijacked by a sophisticated group to use as a weapon in the future."
There's something to think about.
originally posted by: randyvs
a reply to: SkepticOverlord
"We will never know, and will never see any evidence"
is the obvious choice.
originally posted by: LadyGreenEyes
I find it interesting that no one, so far, has voted that it simply crashed.
:The alien abduction theory is viable and not up for ridicule. A Japanese airliner off the coast of Alaska in the mid 80's was tailed by a large uFO mothership for an hour. There is the pilot's testimony along with flight and radar recodings to verify the incident that happened.
originally posted by: CharlieSpeirs
a reply to: SkepticOverlord
I wanted to say shot down, but as there was no option I chose a new weapon tested!
It's quite funny that more people think Aliens abducted it as well
Edit: The situation itself is not funny though, I have to clarify that!!!
Great idea for a poll!
Edit: Mid-Air Event seemed to be hinting at technological failure so weapons test was more appropriate!!!The alien abduction option is viable and not up for ridicule. A Japanese airliner off the coast of Alaska in the mid 80's was tailed by a large UFO mothership for about an hour. There is the pilot's testimony and flight and radar recordings to verify the incident occurred.
Peace SO!
I agree! Although if the plane surfaces again in some kind of two-part scheme, we'll know what happened to it... at least partially...
originally posted by: randyvs
a reply to: SkepticOverlord
"We will never know, and will never see any evidence"
is the obvious choice.
it read like you were ridiculing the abduction option, bud. If you weren't, rephrase it in a better manner so things don't be taken out of context.
originally posted by: CharlieSpeirs
a reply to: RossWellOldMexico
I wasn't ridiculing the abduction option pal, just found it gave me a decent laugh!!!
Again to emphasise, not that I find the situation funny itself, it's the worst thing to happen this year alongside the Nigerian Schoolgirls & the S.K Ship sinking!!!
Peace Ross!!!
originally posted by: RossWellOldMexico
:The alien abduction theory is viable and not up for ridicule. A Japanese airliner off the coast of Alaska in the mid 80's was tailed by a large uFO mothership for an hour. There is the pilot's testimony along with flight and radar recodings to verify the incident that happened.
originally posted by: CharlieSpeirs
a reply to: SkepticOverlord
I wanted to say shot down, but as there was no option I chose a new weapon tested!
It's quite funny that more people think Aliens abducted it as well
Edit: The situation itself is not funny though, I have to clarify that!!!
Great idea for a poll!
Edit: Mid-Air Event seemed to be hinting at technological failure so weapons test was more appropriate!!!The alien abduction option is viable and not up for ridicule. A Japanese airliner off the coast of Alaska in the mid 80's was tailed by a large UFO mothership for about an hour. There is the pilot's testimony and flight and radar recordings to verify the incident occurred.
Peace SO!
:The alien abduction theory is viable and not up for ridicule.