Pilot forgetting to turn off chemtrail DEBUNKED

a reply to: mindtricks11

i have done the research and came to the conclusion that chemtrails are real and contrails form sporadically as they always did.

So how do you explain this...

www.457thbombgroup.org...

Or these...

a reply to: ScientiaFortisDefendit

Sure go i would just like to say chemtrails are real and once again proof was given and was completely manipulated and distorted. no answers were given. there was no debate. you're just making people more sure that there really is something going on to try and cover this up, not that they're seeing contrails. bye

a reply to: mindtricks11

Your idea of proof is pathetic. You say you see things that are not possible, you act like you are something important and cannot divulge your location, and then you whine when nobody believes you. Hell, nobody can help you.

Enjoy your blissful ignorance. You are surrounded by it.

a reply to: network dude
The focus here is chemtrails dude, not me. calm down. lets discuss the evidence i presented.

a reply to: mindtricks11

Sure go i would just like to say chemtrails are real and once again proof was given and was completely manipulated and distorted.

Care to show where that has happened?

a reply to: tsurfer2000h
No.... look it up yourself

a reply to: mindtricks11

It's funny you put it that way, as I do agree.

The more often people demand something doesn't exist in an impossible position of proving a negative for the only support, the more I come to think those were chemtrails I have seen over the years vs. odd behavior with contrails.

Absolutist positions do succeed in digging people deeper into their own views than may ever have otherwise existed. I know it's had that effect for me, while watching the debate over time.

I didn't have a real strong interest either way until folks started stating as hard fact they didn't and/or couldn't exist. It sells the theory far more than not, IMO.

a reply to: Wrabbit2000
Glad you agree Wrabbit i'm just trying to get my point across in a persistent and comprehensible way.

a reply to: network dude

Wingtip vortices, a real phenom, persist for one to three (1 to 3) minutes. Chemtrails, also a real phenom, persist all day and cover the sky starting out as grid patterns and then spreading to create a haze that cause a glaring sun and a sky so bright it hurts to look at it.

Trying to find something nice to say about the video you put up: I like the way the narrator says 'bosted'...kind of like the way a Bostonian says Boston. I think he could have left out 'pejorative' and, instead, replaced that with the word 'trivial.'

Further, I think you should have called your thread: Trivial Pursuit. Even further, the ultrafine particles emitted by jets during takeoff & landing & idling are something to be concerned about (for airport employees & nearby residents) but that's OT here. Wingtip vortices belong in a pilot's forum unless you can prove that these wakes persisted longer than 3 minutes.

originally posted by: Aloysius the Gaul

Edit to add: and apparently china uses drones to "spray chemtrails"

weird optical in the video, doesn't really look like a full grid as i see more than often in eu but maybe it was very windy, hard to say, stayed only 4 month in japan, no memories of grid sky there

one day in china, didn't see the sky

what about north india / burma / nepal / sri lanka ? anyone found anything grid like ?

a reply to: Wrabbit2000

I didn't have a real strong interest either way until folks started stating as hard fact they didn't and/or couldn't exist. It sells the theory far more than not, IMO.

So what hard facts that were stated that makes you think chemtrails could be real?

And how can someone believe in something like chemtrails being real yet there is no evidence to show they are?

Also no debunker will say there isn't a chance of them being real, because there could be but as of this post there hasn't been anything that is shown as evidence they exist.

originally posted by: mindtricks11
a reply to: network dude
The focus here is chemtrails dude, not me. calm down. lets discuss the evidence i presented.

How about you remind me of ANY "proof" that you have supplied here.

I see fantasies that you have, perhaps dreams you mistake for reality.

See, in the real world, you need to provide more than opinion.
You have provided nothing.

originally posted by: mindtricks11
a reply to: tsurfer2000h
No.... look it up yourself

Case dismissed. Court is adjourned.

a reply to: luxordelphi

You missed the context.
yesterday, there were two threads that popped up with the same video, claiming it was chemtrails that the pilot forgot to turn off. The video I provided was just an explanation so no more threads would pop up using the same lies.

I am not sure if you are aware of this, but people in the chemtrail community have a habit of spreading lies, portraying them as truth.

a reply to: network dude
I have provided irrefutable proof ! that's what i provided and everyone real here supports this claims. thank you network dude. i couldn't have done it without you. your "skepticism" made me go further than i ever went before. Chemtrails are real ok now lets demand to know what their purpose is .

originally posted by: mindtricks11
a reply to: network dude
I have provided irrefutable proof !

sorry - I completely missed your post of irrefutable proof and it seems to be missing from this thread - could you link to it please??

Thanks

originally posted by: anHairInTheSoup

weird optical in the video, doesn't really look like a full grid as i see more than often in eu but maybe it was very windy, hard to say, stayed only 4 month in japan, no memories of grid sky there

It's a fisheye lens showing the whole sky AFAIK. What is a "full grid" - there are lines crossing, lots of parallel lines - looks like a grid to me.

Are you shifting the goalposts to fit your conclusions??

one day in china, didn't see the sky

what about north india / burma / nepal / sri lanka ? anyone found anything grid like ?

Have you tried to research it yourself??

a reply to: Aloysius the Gaul
People can go and search for it in the previous pages. it is there. you can look for it too. proof that chemtrails are real.

a reply to: mindtricks11
I looked at all your messages, and I cannot identify which one has any irrefutable proof - everything you have said is pretty easily refuted and has been.

I know you don't agree, but I would still like to know which of your errors you consider "irrefutable"

a reply to: Aloysius the Gaul

You must have not looke at all my messages. The proof is there. you just don't want to see it. so you are one of the few
When faced with scientific proof and still in denial, you're the one who is part of a conspiracy here now....