It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
originally posted by: SearchLightsInc
They want me to eat meat that has been blessed by a god i dont believe in?
a reply to: MeteoraXV
genuine halal slaughter, performed by a muslim who is skilled and trained and knows what to do, is indeed more humane than the western method
really the only reason people were cheering when denmark banned halal and kosher is that they don't like muslims plain and simple.
originally posted by: tadaman
a reply to: ~Lucidity
I have no problem with Muslims. I probably have more muslim friends than most people on this board.
They dont appreciate the extra attention a few make for them.
In the end this is forced multiculturalism. Its counterproductive and brings negative attention to them.
They dont need special rules or considerations given to them. They never needed it before. Just respect their customs and live in your society as you always have and they will do just the same.
They just dont eat what is pork. Removing it all together or altering the butchering process for the express purpose of THEIR comfort and acceptance is just retarded. From a white / western guilt perspective I guess it serves the purpose of showing you are an EXTRA nice person who is very ahead of your time...what ever the hell that means.
EDIT TO ADD:
Perhaps we should have a conjoined fetus day like south park had....you know, for that extra show of sensitivity....
originally posted by: FlyersFan
originally posted by: SearchLightsInc
They want me to eat meat that has been blessed by a god i dont believe in?
OOOH. I didn't realize that. (I may have known that and forgot ... or I might not ever have known). Yeah ... that changes things for me. I wouldn't want to eat food 'blessed' in a religion to a god I didn't believe in either. If the Subways ever did that here, then I'd have to stop buying it for the family.
I thought the halal meat was just a way of slaughter.
Well, this isn't in our part of the world, so I guess it doesn't effect us here.
The food must come from a supplier that uses halal practices. Specifically, the slaughter must be performed by a Muslim, who must precede the slaughter by invoking the name of Allah, most commonly by saying "Bismillah" ("In the name of God") and then three times "Allahu akbar" (God is the greatest). Then, the animal must be slaughtered with a sharp knife by cutting the throat, windpipe and the blood vessels in the neck (while the animal is conscious), causing the animal’s death without cutting the spinal cord. Lastly, the blood from the veins must be drained
originally posted by: MALBOSIA
I don't know how it is in the UK but here in Canada I do not see many Muslims eating at Subway. Just us godless white trash usually. Most of them are owned by E. Indians but I don't think they are Muslim.
UK must have a waay higher Muslim population to make this a smart business move.
originally posted by: MeteoraXV
a reply to: dam00
burden of proof yes but i am embarrassed to say that because i can read so fast i go through information so fast that i don't save the websites i find through google. i can literally read 10 lengthy articles in 15 or 20 minutes. one day i just tackled this subject without bias, started googling and reading random websites and articles from all sides (anti-halal, muslims, and neutral/scientific) and came out convinced that in comparison to the western method, ritual slaughter is indeed far more humane. also, having witnessed actual slaughters being carried out, both on a western farm and a genuine halal abattoir in the netherlands, i have experienced both methods.
also keep in mind, as with any subject there are simply too many contradicting studies that come out literally every single week. is milk good or bad after all? is beer good or bad after all? is wine good or bad after all? is pork healthy or not? i am always skeptical when someone presents scientific evidence or studies because they could simply be one sided or there exist contradictory studies. if i gave you one article, i'm going to have to give another one as well, and another one, and another one, etc because i can't be one sided. i can only tell you what i believe is more humane from my own culmination of research. you're going to have to do your own research and make up your own mind.
after all, what is the ats slogan again? deny ignorance?
religious slaughter of poultry, sheep and cattle caused unnecessary suffering to animals.
Speaking to The Times newspaper Mr Blackwell said British abattoirs could follow the example of the Danish meat industry, which bans the slaughter of animals which are not stunned prior to death.
originally posted by: BoovDawg
Sorry lucidream n interpod, I am just ranting it probly has something to do with the muslims in my home town the other year refusing to serve me with petrol at their garage when their was a shortage and only serving "their own" forcing us to go elsewhere and running out of petrol and not getting to the hospital on time with my mam to see gran before she died! It probly all stems from then and believe me I am open minded I do not put all the chips in one bowl or woteva I believe there are some bad some good in all walks of life, it just seems to be one thing after another and I am sorry but I do not want to be a muslim!