Benghazi emails: White House aide involved in prepping Rice for ‘video’ explanation (Liars!)

Newly released emails on the Benghazi terror attack suggest a senior White House aide played a central role in preparing former U.N. ambassador Susan Rice for her controversial Sunday show appearances -- where she wrongly blamed protests over an Internet video.

More than 100 pages of documents were released to the conservative watchdog group Judicial Watch as part of a Freedom of Information Act lawsuit. Among them was a Sept. 14, 2012, email from Ben Rhodes, an assistant to the president and deputy national security adviser for strategic communications.

The Rhodes email, with the subject line: "RE: PREP Call with Susan: Saturday at 4:00 pm ET," was sent to a dozen members of the administration's inner circle, including key members of the White House communications team such as Press Secretary Jay Carney. In the email, Rhodes specifically draws attention to the anti-Islam Internet video, without distinguishing whether the Benghazi attack was different from protests elsewhere.

The email lists the following two goals, among others: "To underscore that these protests are rooted in an Internet video, and not a broader failure of policy." "To reinforce the President and Administration's strength and steadiness in dealing with difficult challenges." The email goes on to state that the U.S. government rejected the message of the Internet video. "We find it disgusting and reprehensible. But there is absolutely no justification at all for responding to this movie with violence," the email stated.

Source: www.foxnews.com...

There you have it. PROOF. For those of you who are going to say "So, it came from Fox News ........" Shame on you.

The case of lying about the death of four Americans and the trail of deceipt from this Administration AND the lengths it went to destroy an American Film maker. WE NEED TO RISE UP PEOPLE.

Why am I not Surprised!

Here we go again....I thought this was going to be a thread about cooking rice.

This is just the beginning of the end.

Wait until they can prove he used the IRS to destroy his political opponents.

This is not just spin...it's an outright lie.

a reply to: anon72
Judicial Watch founder Larry Klayman is at the Bundy ranch signing agreement to represent the family from here on out.

He represents families of Seal Team 6 so he deserves everyone's attention who are anti-NWO.

a reply to: Granite

Wow, I didn't know that.

Thank you.

It may take some time but Justice and Truth will prevail....

Unless, of course, Obama declares marshall law because that is about the only thing that is going to save him in any way (and his buddies).

a reply to: anon72
Jake Tapper at CNN is covering this story too, so it isn't just FOX news.

here is a link.

This proves how much they over-reacted from their fear of the implications the "incident" was going to have on the elections that were a few weeks away at the time.

Massive paranoia.

We can only imagine the wild thoughts going through their heads when they got the news.

They had to create a scapegoat.

They have been exposed.

a reply to: anon72

The fact that the White House lied is no surprise. Obama himself has lied directly to the people of America more than once. When you live a life of deceit and deception, a lie is very easy to perpetuate. The entire federal government system is corrupt, especially the elected officials. Obama has it made, his AG Eric the drug lord Holder will never investigate anything involving the administration, this is unstoppable for the next 32 months. And if Hitlary wins the next election we get four more years of lies, unless a rogue shoe (or was it bats) scare her away. The MSM is just as guilty of lies and deceit to people they are supposed to inform the truth to. Four Americans died representing our country and the government covers it up, nobody is held accountable. Disgusting!

In the complaints, skepticism, and cries of scandal about Benghazi, I'm still surprised that most of the arguments relate to petty issues that relate back to whether or not the attack was generated by a video or if it was a planned attack by some anti-US faction. What I find so much more intriguing is that we even had an embassy and ambassador in a country which had just had a coup d'état, that the staff at the nearby CIA station seemed to be larger than the supposed state department staff, that we could even get away with having a CIA station in a foreign country and anybody ever know about it, and most importantly that both the state department staff and the CIA station were actively involved in an arms smuggling operation to Syria supporting rebels and where the CIA was obviously plotting to have their next coup d'état. When will it end?

And they put the guy in jail.
bump

originally posted by: lynxpilot
In the complaints, skepticism, and cries of scandal about Benghazi, I'm still surprised that most of the arguments relate to petty issues that relate back to whether or not the attack was generated by a video or if it was a planned attack by some anti-US faction. What I find so much more intriguing is that we even had an embassy and ambassador in a country which had just had a coup d'état, that the staff at the nearby CIA station seemed to be larger than the supposed state department staff, that we could even get away with having a CIA station in a foreign country and anybody ever know about it, and most importantly that both the state department staff and the CIA station were actively involved in an arms smuggling operation to Syria supporting rebels and where the CIA was obviously plotting to have their next coup d'état. When will it end?

Everyone was thrown under the bus, including the CIA, to save the political agenda of Obama....period. I agree it needs to end, we have no business in other countries affairs unless it is proven to all Americans they are a direct threat to the US. Don't be fooled, the CIA was acting under the direction of Obama....and Valerie of course.

a reply to: anon72

Looking forward to seeing the defense on this.

It's fun to watch the Obama-acolytes squirm.

a reply to: lynxpilot

I think the argument that they were angling for a horsetrade - Stevens for the Blind Shiekh - is getting more plausible all the time.

Think about it - The reason why they were using private and local security there? Funding, but there is no explanation for why they had Marines for security at the consulate in the Bahamas or one of those Caribbean nations that is quiet and could have likely been secured with the private security freeing the Marines to go to Libya, a dangerously unstable country at that time.

They knew that there had been probing attacks on Libya, and what was Stevens doing in Benghazi, as a diplomatic proxy for the president, without anything more than high-priced local rent-a-cops who betrayed him and a few very brave guys who refused to just leave it?

And why was there no military muscle stationed anywhere near being able to bail someone out if there was trouble? That just seems common sense for an unstable country.

"What Difference, At This Point, Does It Make?"- Hilliary Clinton

nation.foxnews.com...


You are about to find out Mrs. Clinton. Save your money and don't run for POTUS.

YOU ARE NOT WORTHY TO REPRESENT THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

That's the difference it makes now and why we will get to the truth about your dirty political dealings-world wide.
You should be ashamed of yourself for letting the Obama Administartion cover up Ambassador Stevens being violated, raped and murdered along with three other Americans. Repeatedly turning down or ignoring Stevens call for more security!

I was going to link the photos of what those bastards did to Mr. Stevens but after looking at the pics, I just couldn't. If you have the guts, Google and you will see. See some horrible photos of that ordeal.

Perhaps kickbacks from arms sales after the buybacks?

Dec 10, 2012

Shortly after the October 2011 death of Qaddafi, Secretary of State Hillary Clinton announced in Tripoli that the U.S. was committing $40 million to help Libya “secure and recover its weapons stockpiles.” Department of State Assistant Secretary Andrew Shapiro confirms DOS had a weapons buy-back program in Libya that was also supported by the UK who gave $1.5 million, the Netherlands gave $1.2 million, Germany gave about $1 million and our neighbor to the north, Canada gave $1.6 million to purchase the deadly arsenal that went missing after the fall of Qaddafi.

The State Department was specifically looking to acquire the 20,000 MANPADS (they are commonly known as man-portable air shoulder-fire missiles) that went missing once Qaddafi was killed.

OOps !!!

Did CIA and State Department Run Illegal Arms Trafficking in Benghazi?


The *Real* Hillary is right here to see.....

"SHOCK! Hillary Clinton argues - What difference, at this point, does it make about how it happened?"

originally posted by: ketsuko
a reply to: lynxpilot

I think the argument that they were angling for a horsetrade - Stevens for the Blind Shiekh - is getting more plausible all the time.

Think about it - The reason why they were using private and local security there? Funding, but there is no explanation for why they had Marines for security at the consulate in the Bahamas or one of those Caribbean nations that is quiet and could have likely been secured with the private security freeing the Marines to go to Libya, a dangerously unstable country at that time.

They knew that there had been probing attacks on Libya, and what was Stevens doing in Benghazi, as a diplomatic proxy for the president, without anything more than high-priced local rent-a-cops who betrayed him and a few very brave guys who refused to just leave it?

And why was there no military muscle stationed anywhere near being able to bail someone out if there was trouble? That just seems common sense for an unstable country.

it's all that "leading from behind" i guess.

and probing? lol, the brits and red cross left! 2 bombings there before the attack! wtf?

where are the wounded? haven't heard them speak.

only 2 guys from the CIA annex went? how many were at the annex?

were they all paper pushers and nerds?

this whole thing drives me nuts!
and don't get me started on the video lies.

hillary will never be ashamed of herself, anon72.

i don't know, did hill's state dept and obama, help kill giddahfy with the help of the people (al q) and that is their thank you?

how is lybia doing these days? btw?

White House to Susan Rice: Blame the Video for Benghazi Attack

Source: www.breitbart.com...

They need to be Tarred and Feathered-or worse.

Interesting you don't see the Obama defenders out and about on this story.

I guess they haven't rec'd their matching orders yet as to what to say/do.

Crickets can be heard, en mass....

originally posted by: anon72
Interesting you don't see the Obama defenders out and about on this story.

I guess they haven't rec'd their matching orders yet as to what to say/do.

Crickets can be heard, en mass....

It's interesting.
Usually they show up even when they don't have something valid to say. They aren't even shouting that it was George Bush's fault or that Obama did it because of all the racists.