It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
originally posted by: ArMaP
a reply to: FraZZleD38
Was that photo taken with the same camera?
originally posted by: Arbitrageur
a reply to: conundrummer
Interesting idea, but I see a couple of problems with it.
1. While a solid arm could block the horizontal line, I don't understand how a reflection would block it whether it's the windowsill or the white line at the road edge. In order for the reflection of an arm to block it, it would have to be something behind the arm, in the opposite direction, and in that case how could the horizontal line be a window sill or road edge line?
2. The second vehicle I owned was rare in the sense it had flat side windows. it was an old jeep-like thing with doors which were perfectly flat which explained how they could hold the flat glass. But most modern cars have doors that curve in at the top so the glass also curves in at the top. This creates two effects with reflections, a slight distortion due to the curvature (think funhouse effect), and more importantly, the reflection doesn't come straight back at you. if you look out horizsontally, because the glass isn't vertical.
There are a couple of ways around #2, if the vehicle was the very rare type like I had with vertical side window glass. If it didn't then you might imagine scrunching down to aim up a little which could still make such a reflection on the angled glass, but this would be a lot easier to do on the passenger side than the drivers side so it would be interesting to know if the photo was taken from inside the car and from which side.
That still leaves problem 1 though. However it does look enough like an arm holding a camera that we shouldn't dismiss your idea completely, but I think we would need a better explanation for the blocked horizontal line unless I'm missing something.
I really have no idea what it is, but the photographer might.
No to all the other questions......
originally posted by: sparrowstail
Did your son report any humming sounds,My son heard nothing the girl says she heard a very faint hum nothing loud at all. feelings of static electricity in the air. How about electronics? Any mal-functions with car or phones or other? How about psychological phenoms? Any feelings or thoughts conveyed during his sighting? Any residual feelings or messages I guess other than the normal fear and bewilderment?
originally posted by: gortex
a reply to: FraZZleD38
And the Victory Field I searched for a run way but all I see is a field with no where to land.
Here's FAA details for Victory Field Airport , it has two turf runways.
Victory Field
To me it seems like a likely candidate as it is almost exactly where you say the sighting was.
In the airport notes there's mention of an 100ft tower 2,5 miles NE of that location , you could check to see if that is lit up at night .
originally posted by: romilo
a reply to: Arbitrageur
If entertain possiblity its ufo, then this image could be showing some sort of energy based "elevator" that greyish area and then could that greenish are be actual alien being in the ground area of greyish area, it kinda looks like hes tall and slim looking up long hands on the side. Thats just how i see it but ofcourse i wasnt there experiencing the situation but i can entertain this possibility, i seen some weird objects in the sky also.
originally posted by: ArMaP
originally posted by: FraZZleD38
This is where he says they saw it.......
Based on that image and using Google's Street View, this is what I got.
Looking at that post with the mailbox, I think this is very close to the place where the photo was taken, but for the post to cross the white line it means the photo was taken from the field and not from the road, pointing south instead of north, and in that case the camera was pointing more or less in the same direction as in the following image.
originally posted by: Arbitrageur
Thanks for following up, it's nice to see some research like this! Hope you can post something of the same view from the same spot in daylight which should at least help us identify the foreground object which probably hadn't moved if it's a fencepost as you suspect.
originally posted by: FraZZleD38
Well it's getting late I want to thank everyone for all your help. I hope I can find the spot he was standing in tomorrow. If I do I'll post a photo of it in the day light.
a reply to: ArMaP
Thanks ArMaP, I was going to try something similar but when FraZZleD38 said they might try to post a daytime image from the same spot I decided to just wait and see if that is posted.
originally posted by: ArMaP
originally posted by: Kratos40
Based on the original picture, I know some ATS people can tease out some details from the darkness. No offense to Arbigatreur, but that was awful.
Not much can be done with a photo that has only 1407 colours, with 97.5% of all the pixels having just 6 colours.
Good question They said it was a little windy.
originally posted by: researcher88
Good research here, I have a question as well, anyone know whether it was windy, or still, this will also affect the sound question.
originally posted by: Arbitrageur
a reply to: researcher88
I used to watch airplanes come in for a landing at the airport from a water tower just outside the airport. I could almost always see the planes long before I could hear them. So wouldn't dismiss an airplane explanation just because you can't hear it.
Also at Chicago O'hare, from the ground, I could see over a dozen planes stacked up for landings in the glide paths, and I couldn't hear any of them, until they got reasonably close.
Takeoffs are much noisier than landings though.
Yes, wind speed and direction can affect how much sound you hear from the plane.
originally posted by: conundrummer
originally posted by: Arbitrageur
When I see the moon just over the treetops while driving it looks like the moon is flying over the treetops in a similar illusion.
Can he identify that structure in the foreground? Given that and the direction he might be able to see if there is a structure in the background as viewed from that angle with lights on it that would match this.
I think the structure in the foreground is a reflection of the guy's upheld camera taking the picture and reflecting off of his car window, much like what we recently saw with the deer camera "UFO". I'm basing this on the fact that the structure seems to be interrupting the horizontal grey/blue line which is presumably the car's windowsill or possibly a paint line on the side of the road. If it were a structure like a telephone pole or tower it should appear on the opposite side of that horizontal line.
It doesn't explain the lights but it probably explains the one enhanceable feature in the photo.
originally posted by: conundrummer
Using my proprietary image editing software, I've managed to further enhance the photo:
i59.photobucket.com...
(just kidding guys )
now if wind was in their direction and no sound, we can consider this as non air plane, but wind in other directions can be planes and you will not hear them. especially at night and in open acoustics.
From my own experience, if you believe they exist and you want to see them you will, they will show themselves in a very subtle way.
Thanks for trying, but obviously the semi-horizontal line thing is not present nor is any daytime view of what was blocking it. It's not easy to get the exact same view.
originally posted by: FraZZleD38
Here's the photo of what it looks like in the daytime. Took this photo when I took mother home. The address of the driveway he pulled into is on the mail box. He tried to take an exact photo in the daylight. He was not sure the zoom was the same, but he tried like crazy to figure out the picture he took.