It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
originally posted by: schadenfreude
Here's a thought I haven't seen anyone else mention; what if the owner of this axe had to fight OTHER Nephilim?
originally posted by: hellobruce
originally posted by: schadenfreude
Here's a thought I haven't seen anyone else mention; what if the owner of this axe had to fight OTHER Nephilim?
Here is another thought..... what evidence is there for the existence of 10-12 feet high giants in the USA.....
originally posted by: JohnnyCanuck
originally posted by: hellobruce
originally posted by: schadenfreude
Here's a thought I haven't seen anyone else mention; what if the owner of this axe had to fight OTHER Nephilim?
Here is another thought..... what evidence is there for the existence of 10-12 feet high giants in the USA.....
Oh, man?...ya had to ask?
Well, no. They are quite readily identified as a hafted instrument, and the 'working end' shows what's called usewear. There's really no mystery to them.
originally posted by: raymundoko
a reply to: IndianaJoe
Even then it would probably be and anchor stone :-)
originally posted by: Verum1quaere
looks like history is not what we think…
Within a year of their discovery, the Michigan Relics were denounced as forgeries by leading experts on the ancient Near East. One scholar called them "humbugs of the first water"; another, deeply unimpressed by the quality of the forgeries, said they were "remarkable only for their clumsy character." In spite of statements like these, highly respected clergymen were intrigued by the images depicted on the tablets, which were reminiscent of biblical scenes. In the end, however, all emphatically concluded that the whole episode was nothing but "a story of forgeries and deception."
One of the most enduring archaeological hoaxes, the Michigan relics, a series of copper, slate, and clay forgeries, were "discovered" throughout counties in Michigan from the late 19th century until 1920. James Scotford and Daniel Soper apparently worked together to create and sell the forgeries. Scholars and archaeologists were skeptical from the outset, but interest in the objects persisted. In 1911 James E. Talmage studied the relics, recognizing the impact they could have on the perception of the Book of Mormon if they were genuine. In a detailed report, Talmage dismissed them as blatant forgeries.
A systematic review of the historical background of the relics and a material analysis of the relics themselves were published in BYU Studies in 2001. These studies satisfied church authorities that the Relics were fraudulent creations and thus irrelevant to the collections of the Museum of Church History and Art. Acting on a suggestion by Dr. Richard Stamps, author of one of the Brigham Young University reports, they opened discussions with the Michigan Historical Center. In 2003, the Michigan Relics returned to the state in which they were created.
originally posted by: stirling
Could there be organic materials that may be carbon dated still in the groove?
If its Nephelim its older than 4000 yrs I think....it may belong to the Giants with the double rows of teeth that roamed the west and were wiped out by the Native Americans...
originally posted by: hellobruce
Here is another thought..... what evidence is there for the existence of 10-12 feet high giants in the USA.....
“the biggest cover-up in the history of mankind is the history of mankind itself”
“There are two histories: official history, lying, and then secret history, where you find the real causes of events.” ~ Honoré de Balzac
Quest for Death Valley Giants and the Cover Up
I asked about what happened to the full bodies and the older curator said University of Berkeley had came and taken all the giant skeletons away for study decades ago and this was all that had survived that grab. ...if you research into giants or other races they will end your career immediately, we are told to say it’s all 1800’s media fraud regardless of the evidence, in fact they think they have found a living tribe of Neanderthals in northernmost Canada, but I don’t know anymore about it, it’s pretty controversial, again if you ask questions you’ll be working at McDonalds tomorrow”. Source
Well, evidences abound, and this is one. I should say that there could be many more at hand, but when they have been found by Darwinians, they have been ignored, hidden or simply destroyed. Destroyed by those who later on demand such evidence. An example of this is the "mysterious" disappearance of more than 50 perfectly kept gigantic antediluvian skeletons (between 10-14 feet tall) found in a cave in Arizona. You may, or not, have heard that Mr. Samuel Hubbard, discovered remains of giants in a cave in the magnificent Grand Canyon of Arizona."Source
"A cave full of giant skeletons was found by telephone employees near Santa Barbara, California. Unfortunately, the cave entrance was sealed shut before proper excavation could be conducted."
"A giant skeleton on Santa Cruz Island, California, was sent to the National Science Foundation in Washington, D.C., where it was promptly "misplaced". Source
"...authorities ordered the skeleton and all the artifacts secretly reburied- and, of course, lost to the scientific study they deserved.” Source
• A human thigh bone 8 feet 4 inches long from Mexico.
• Human skeletons unearthed near Palermo, Sicily, in 1548 and 1550, measuring 30 feet, 33 feet and 30 feet.
• Two human skeletons unearthed near Athens, Greece, in recent centuries (one 34 feet long, the other 36 feet long).
• A skeleton reportedly 29 feet in length found in 1456 near the Rhone River.
• A 19'6" human skeleton found in 1577 A.D. under an overturned oak tree in the Canton of Lucerne.
• 23-foot tall skeleton found in 1456 A.D. beside a river in Valence, France.
• A 25' 6 " skeleton found in 1613 A.D. near the castle of Chaumont in France. This was claimed to be a nearly complete find.
Almost beyond comprehension or believability was the find of the two separate 36-foot human remains uncovered by Carthaginians somewhere between 200-600 B.C.
Source
The Footprint of God In South Africa
"...a giant footprint of a woman measuring over 4 feet long has been carbon dated at approximately 9 million years old. "...the two-legged being would need to be some 30 feet tall! "...there is a higher probability of little green men arriving from space and licking it out with their tongues, than being created by natural erosion" ~ Prof. Pieter Wagener
originally posted by: Murgatroid
The biggest clue is the absolute massive amount of evidence that just so "happens" to get lost over and over...
originally posted by: hellobruce
You quote known hoaxers like Quale.... There is no real evidence in the first place, it is all just hoaxes....
A warning . . . apparently you CANNOT rely on Snopes. They may be part of the media that is working to suppress the truth or spreading disinformation. Snopes apparently never fact-checked and simply 'parroted' the propaganda and lies taken from government websites or spewed forth by ...
Snopes' Credibility Damaged
Snopes is a large part of the liberal propaganda machine ...
I have submitted several things to Snopes which I know to be true that Snopes claimed were bogus. Snopes is heavily financed by George Soros; a big time supporter of Obama! Yep you got it; Snopes Lied!
Snopes funded by Soros.. and people are still stupid enough to believe it
Is Snopes A Disinformation Operation?
For those of you that put your trust in Snopes...
Many of the emails that have been sent or forwarded that had any anti Obama in it were negated by Snopes. I thought that was odd. Check this out.
Snopes, Soros and the Supreme Court's Kagan. We-l-l-l-l now, I guess the time has come to check out Snopes! You don't suppose it might not be a good time to take a second look at some of the stuff that got kicked in the ditch by Snopes, do you?
We've known that it was owned by a lefty couple but hadn't known it to be financed by Soros!
Snopes is heavily financed by George Soros, a big time supporter of Obama! In our Search for the truth department, we find what I have suspected on many occasions.
LINK
originally posted by: Murgatroid
Like I said, everything you believe is a hoax.
Snopes is heavily financed by George Soros; a big time supporter of Obama!
originally posted by: hellobruce
Exactly what is your source for that silly claim?
InterActiveCorp owns about.com
- ( IAC ) is an American internet company with over 50 brands across 40 countries headquartered in New York City.
- The Chairman and Senior Executive is Barry Diller,who was previously head of Paramount Pictures, Fox Broadcasting, and USA Broadcasting.
wiki.answers.com...
originally posted by: Murgatroid
What is YOUR source for your silly claims?