Obama Declassifies Antigravity Technology

amunaor.com... ty-technology/#comment-926








ATS is a discussion board Not a bulletin board.
Please include your views on the topic as a means to inspire discussion.
Mod Note: Starting A New Thread – Please Review This Link.

a reply to: jerry777

The B-2 is not an antigravity craft, and no antigravity system has been declassified (I'm not even convinced antigravity is even close to design, let alone flying around).

That is an older article, as we know, it never happened.

a reply to: jerry777

OP, after seeing such a lackluster thread, I was inclined to checkout your history.

It seems that your threads have a common theme of antigravity. Can you give me some insight as to why this is of interest? Have you had any personal experiences or have you read something that makes you believe?

a reply to: freakjive

They could be a shill looking to discredit those of us who do believe that there's a viable technology out there. Trust me, it's not a run-on.

maybe someday..

my kids will have my long desired hoverboard.

When I saw the title, all I could think about was going to buy my Speeder Bike. Hopefully Polaris will have one in stock.

a reply to: rickymouse very true but a step in the right direction

a reply to: freakjive i have read about (Telsa/Brown and a bunch of others) back in the 1980's i saw a news report on the 6:00 o'clock news (National TV) Nasa discovered a 24 mile OBJECTin space. After that you did not here much about it. Around the same time Congress approved the Supercollider (6 Billion dollars) Do i beleive in Antigravity YES. To answer your question no i never had the pleasure of seeing one in person or a bunch of them but thousands of people all around the world have. lets go half of them are full of poop.BUT the other half are not

a reply to: Zaphod58 do you beleive the Black worlds (USA China Russa etc) have Antigravity?

a reply to: jerry777

No. Maybe eventually but not now.

a reply to: Zaphod58

What evidence do you have that something such as antigravity technology doesn't exist?

a reply to: brazenalderpadrescorpio

Other than knowing what the system they're talking about on the B-2 is, and the fact that no antigravity system has been released to date?

What credible evidence do you have that it does exist?

originally posted by: HanzHenry
maybe someday..

my kids will have my long desired hoverboard.

When I saw the title, all I could think about was going to buy my Speeder Bike. Hopefully Polaris will have one in stock.

Is that crazyewok after one too many pints?

Im not unconvinced that antigravity research and testing is going on, perhaps farther along than the general public will know. Just imagine how many satellites and space busses and craziness would go on if the technology went public?

a reply to: the owlbear

I have no doubt it's being developed. I just don't think there is a current practical design.

a reply to: Zaphod58

That's an appeal to ignorance (argumentum ex silentio). Just because there's no official proof that the technology doesn't exist, doesn't mean that the technology doesn't exist. But since you're an aircraft expert, I can see how you would be concerned with the here and now, as far as that (aircraft projects) is concerned.

a reply to: Zaphod58

Canceling out gravity is only so helpful, you need anti-inertia to make those 90 degree turns and instant accelerations.

a reply to: brazenalderpadrescorpio

So you can ask for proof that it doesn't exist, but I can't ask you for proof that it does? That's a hell of a double standard.

The B-2 doesn't use antigravity, just normal aerodynamics, with a few less publicized systems thrown in.

a reply to: Tajlakz

Exactly. AG only gets you so far. It makes for cheap space flight though if it can be developed.

a reply to: Zaphod58

I'm not saying that I have proof either. It's just a belief that I have. At least I admit that it's just a belief, though.

a reply to: brazenalderpadrescorpio

And I specifically said "the B-2 doesn't use antigravity, and no antigravity programs have been released", if you had taken the time to read instead of jumping in and demanding proof it doesn't exist.

I never said anything about whether it was under development or anything else before you said prove it doesn't exist.

Since when does my original statement mean "antigravity doesn't exist"?