New study links brain abnormalities to brain research

It's my own study but i have found that researching and scanning causes brain abnormalities. Anytime we look inside a living brain there is damage done that can only be linked to the study itself. Therefore any changes that are found are a result of our inquiring minds.Leave them brains alone.

How did you find that out?

ah yes,
the old "researchers cause cancer in test rats" syndrome
ban research

also im thinkin it may have to do with the tools used to open the skull cavity.
multitools and carpenters tools should probably not be used for brain surgery...again....

reply to post by twfau


I study studies

deadeyedick
reply to post by twfau

 

I study studies

Then with all due respect, we await the presentation of your case with its demonstrable comparative results.

aboutface

deadeyedick
reply to post by twfau

 

I study studies

Then with all due respect, we await the presentation of your case with its demonstrable comparative results.

as he said, so it can be properly peer reviewed

What ever, I believe you. It is like the double slit experiment, the outcome was modified just by the fact an observer was there.

deadeyedick
It's my own study but i have found that researching and scanning causes brain abnormalities.

I would love to hear about this study, I always thought using your brain was good for your brain. Why don't you share some of your discoveries with is? Oh wait, that's bad for my brain

Just a jk a jab at a new harvard study not to be named. however much can be said as to the validity of real studies and probing ones mind is never a good option no matter the means. Truthfully it is impossible to have a completely non biased study of anything and the smaller the subject the more skewed the results. The majority of ats should not need a study to confirm common sense. ex. if you go and look outside the view you will get is not the same as someone very close viewing the same thing. It then becomes a circular argument back and forth until one view is accepted and another rejected even though each are unique in their own ways.

reply to post by deadeyedick


Waaaa this guys on some next level shiz fam......

deadeyedick
It's my own study but i have found that researching and scanning causes brain abnormalities. Anytime we look inside a living brain there is damage done that can only be linked to the study itself. Therefore any changes that are found are a result of our inquiring minds.Leave them brains alone.

Hi deeadeyedick!
Are you talking about CT scans or MRI scans?

CT scanners bombard the body with x ray beams which can create mutations (which can become tumors) and even since the beginning of the Computed Tomography scans, physicians have worried about increasing people's risk of developing cancer or other abnormalities. CT scans have been used for over forty years now and they estimate the risk to be at less than 2%. Common drugs people take every day (for hypertension, blood thinning, etc) carry a much higher risk with all the side effects they can cause, and yet people still take them.

CT scans like all other xrays should not be abused, but the same goes with medicines....always make sure the benefits are greater than the risks.

reply to post by Agartha


congrats. you waded through all my bs and found the truth. It just amazed me that a new study focusing on smoking herb could come to such conclusions as they did while magnetically scanning brains to find harm. Just seems illogical and out of bounds of any rational thinking. However i guess my opinion is skewed because i am anti frequency.

reply to post by deadeyedick


Could you please link that study? I'd love to read it.

reply to post by Agartha


www.bostonglobe.com... keYkXTXlJ/story.html

drain bamage




Perhaps another study should be done on just how far collage students will go for money. Many would say that this thread is empirical evidence of the effects of the unnamed.

That study has appeared in most of the major new sources and yet it's a terrible study with illogical conclusions, using only 40 participants. They have 'found' a relationship (correlation - no causality) between using a substance and the brain changing, but have decided to label this change as 'abnormal' in order to suggest brain damage. The theory of brain plasticity is that the brain is continually altering depending on which areas are the most stimulated, so if you were to listen to music once a week, it would alter the areas of the brain that processes the music, I doubt people would label this change as 'damage' or 'abnormal'.

reply to post by twfau


I agree, you can't come to a conclusion when you have only tested 20 users and 20 non users! They need a few hundreds at least.