People who flirt on internet randomly are ugly animals

candlestick

Aleister
reply to post by candlestick

 

This is turning out to be a very good thread, and my apologies for my mocking tone in that one post (when I pretended to invite you over for coffee). Thank you for opening up this interesting discussion.

Really?Are you sincere?

Why it turning out to be a very good thread?What is your point ?

Yes. You are bringing up a topic which I haven't seen discussed in a thread here before, are sincerely answering questions, and expanding the original post of the thread. People should remember this is in the rant forum, and is a concern that you've had.

On the asexual or sexual nature of a person's life, I personally think the sexual urge is of such a biological nature that it connects many things to it. Aside from the drive to procreate, the human nervous system and brain use the sexual reactions to release beneficial hormones, to give the body an excuse to give and receive affection, and, importantly, provide what many say is a key to spiritual experiences (especially if done "right" - prolonged experience, etc.).

But your concern about people, especially men (beasts!), trolling the internet for sex or profit to be gained by human's sexual nature (and nobody ever went broke - or shouldn't have - peddling sex to the masses), is very important for a discussion. There are sites specifically for those purposes, and in most of the civilized world now internet man can order up what they want if they can afford it. People should not, imnho, be soliciting sex from fellow members of a site, but flirting is in many ways both being friendly (eye of the beholder) or a way to relieve some of the sexual tension which a healthy body creates within its nervous system. Overt and persistent "hitting" on someone on the internet is frowned upon by most monitored sites, and thus those sites provide a safe place to play, learn, and discuss - in the case of ATS - thousands of different topics in a generally courteous and safe atmosphere.

And my point is your thread has expanded the discussion in those areas.

menneni
Unbelievably entertaining thread, OP.

The experience is happening between your ears, me thinks.

Somehow there are others to blame.
Shift the blame = modify the outcome.

Funny or wut

edit on 16-4-2014 by menneni because: (no reason given)

I don't know what are you talking about.

Aleister

But your concern about people, especially men (beasts!), trolling the internet for sex or profit to be gained by human's sexual nature (and nobody ever went broke - or shouldn't have - peddling sex to the masses), is very important for a discussion. There are sites specifically for those purposes, and in most of the civilized world now internet man can order up what they want if they can afford it. People should not, imnho, be soliciting sex from fellow members of a site, but flirting is in many ways both being friendly (eye of the beholder) or a way to relieve some of the sexual tension which a healthy body creates within its nervous system. Overt and persistent "hitting" on someone on the internet is frowned upon by most monitored sites, and thus those sites provide a safe place to play, learn, and discuss - in the case of ATS - thousands of different topics in a generally courteous and safe atmosphere.

And my point is your thread has expanded the discussion in those areas.

I didn't say for any gender especially,but we know which gender did it more.

Helping you make the important words bigger.

and in most of the civilized world now internet man can order up what they want if they can afford it.

The economic crisis...you know...

a way to relieve some of the sexual tension which a healthy body creates within its nervous system.

Estrus cats love to pissing everywhere in public space...it's good for their nervous system.
But not good for my nervous system,of course they don't care me.THERE IS NO LOVE.

reply to post by candlestick


Taps back into the Ring (Not the NuvaRing, Aleister. Gotta head you off at the pass. lmao.)

THERE IS NO LOVE. - candlestick

There is ONLY love and fear.
Its sad you will never know love..

DenyFlatulence
reply to post by candlestick

 

There is ONLY love and fear.
Its sad you will never know love..

edit on 16-4-2014 by DenyFlatulence because: (no reason given)

Of course the OP will know love. Just has to learn to give and receive affection, which many people confuse for lust. Lust exists as a need for affection, and has its own rewards. But yes, love will find a way (or is it life will find a way? either or). Candlestick, a saying I made up sums it up well 'Tis better to have love and lost than to never have loved at all' (or is that a saying of DenyFlatulence?). Just take it slow, lots of energy in some of those emotions, and emoticons.

reply to post by Aleister

You're right Aleister. candlestick will know some sort of love in life. Whether it's between candlestick and another person is the question.
Sex is not always the glue that binds a successful and loving relationship. But it certainly helps. lol

to all the girl's i loved before

DenyFlatulence


Taps back into the Ring (Not the NuvaRing, Aleister. Gotta head you off at the pass. lmao.)

I think it's uncool.

DenyFlatulence
There is ONLY love and fear.
Its sad you will never know love..

I smell that kind of religious mind control .
And I really can't feel love or fear form internet pron ads.

Aleister

Just has to learn to give and receive affection, which many people confuse for lust. Lust exists as a need for affection, and has its own rewards. But yes, love will find a way (or is it life will find a way? either or). Candlestick, a saying I made up sums it up well 'Tis better to have love and lost than to never have loved at all' (or is that a saying of DenyFlatulence?). Just take it slow, lots of energy in some of those emotions, and emoticons.

I think I never confuse difference of love or lust because I am asexual.Lust could be lead to rape,so I don't think it's "need for affection",say "need to fXXk" would be more appropriate...I noticed many flirty people are very offensive if they got refusal,some of them just name calling the target directly ,I don't think there's any love.Most of them dare to do this on internet ,but no dare to do this in real life.

999zxcv

to all the girl's i loved before

You are homosexual ?It's off topic.

reply to post by candlestick

I think it's uncool.

Yes. The NuvaRing in use, is actually quite warm. Right around 98-99 degrees Fahrenheit..

I smell that kind of religious mind control .

I smell things too. I call them scents.

And I really can't feel love or fear form internet pron ads.

This is great news!
(I was clearly talking about the essence of human emotions. Love and fear.)

reply to post by candlestick


A no and no too both you just need to lighten up mee thinks

To quickly address your response to me, Candlestick, I'm aware that people change when living in other societies. My stepmother and mom's friend are much the same now as they were when the came over here. The only major change I noticed with my stepmother over 18 years is that she's no longer embarrassed to have a vocal exchange with my dad in public, she gets what she needs to say off her chest before it festers and simmers into anything bigger. According to her, that form of expression (public arguing) is considered rude in China, so I mention it because I think it indeed counts as a social change.

We have an expression in the US from the movie Ferris Bueller's Day Off that I'm fond of. To paraphrase it, "You're so uptight that if you stuck a lump of coal up your backside, in two weeks you'd have a diamond." I fully understand that it's a cultural thing for you, and if you do block people and still have issues...You may need to explain the cultural significance of where you're perspective is coming from. Relax, and give people the same cultural understanding you're demanding. It is, as they say, a two-way street.

reply to post by candlestick


I really appreciate your response to my questions. I have a lot more understanding now.

As a whole, I agree there aren't any truly loving societies. For the most part, the ones that would be considered the most loving are very superficial. However, I do people there are small pockets of loving societies that are scattered into pockets of the larger societies. They are more loving within their own group than with outsiders though. More like large families rather than a society.

Nyiah
To quickly address your response to me, Candlestick, I'm aware that people change when living in other societies. My stepmother and mom's friend are much the same now as they were when the came over here. The only major change I noticed with my stepmother over 18 years is that she's no longer embarrassed to have a vocal exchange with my dad in public, she gets what she needs to say off her chest before it festers and simmers into anything bigger. According to her, that form of expression (public arguing) is considered rude in China, so I mention it because I think it indeed counts as a social change.

We have an expression in the US from the movie Ferris Bueller's Day Off that I'm fond of. To paraphrase it, "You're so uptight that if you stuck a lump of coal up your backside, in two weeks you'd have a diamond." I fully understand that it's a cultural thing for you, and if you do block people and still have issues...You may need to explain the cultural significance of where you're perspective is coming from. Relax, and give people the same cultural understanding you're demanding. It is, as they say, a two-way street.

edit on 4/16/2014 by Nyiah because: Typo

I think it's related with I am asexual far more then cultural background,asexual always be the minority in any cultural background...And I think your stepmother already accepted your cultural background when she moved to US.

calstorm
reply to post by candlestick

 

I really appreciate your response to my questions. I have a lot more understanding now.

As a whole, I agree there aren't any truly loving societies. For the most part, the ones that would be considered the most loving are very superficial. However, I do people there are small pockets of loving societies that are scattered into pockets of the larger societies. They are more loving within their own group than with outsiders though. More like large families rather than a society.

If I want to meet new friends,I prefer "bumpkins " more than urban people.They did far less unwanted flirting.Because there's no honor system in big cities.Don't discriminate against me,I am from big city also.

Is it wrong of me to read everyone of your posts, in a russian accent?

originally posted by: candlestick

RUFFREADY
reply to post by candlestick

 

So.. what do you look like

Have a nice day

None of your business.
People who have enough time to flirt someone they don't know must have time to open their propaganda machine.

Who cares who's business you think it is, you brought up the ugliness in people you never see,

Reading your OP and a few posts gives me a clear image of your beauty or lack of I should say.

I could post a picture of what i assume you look like based on your words but a donkeys butt is attractive to some and creating an image of a person based on your interpretation of what they say on the net is really childish, immature and just plain whacked out strange.

One really annoying issue I found with your rant was that you bring Ugliness and how these people must be ugly animals.

You also tell us you are asexual, not celibate or that you have an abstention from sexual activity.

Then say you have no interest in things sexual, so are you celibate or asexual?

Ugliness in others as a physical trait is of a sexual nature based on physical attractions (you said ugly animals so I assume you are talking about looks)

If sexual matters don't interest or concern you and disgust you then no one would be ugly or attractive to you but they are, they are ugly animals to you.

Why are you lying? You maybe cannot see that you are deceiving yourself and in turn deceiving others, to find a person physically ugly because of them flirting with you means you have much sexual frustration and have issues that need be resolved before the physical part affecting you becomes mental and physiological if it already hasn't.

originally posted by: InhaleExhale

Ugliness in others as a physical trait is of a sexual nature based on physical attractions (you said ugly animals so I assume you are talking about looks)

I don't want to fXXk them doesn't mean I can't have a aesthetic standard of good looking or ugly.I can say the behavior is ugly.
All aesthetic standard and physical attraction must base on sex?Maybe for you and some animals are right,not me.

originally posted by: candlestick

originally posted by: InhaleExhale

Ugliness in others as a physical trait is of a sexual nature based on physical attractions (you said ugly animals so I assume you are talking about looks)

I don't want to fXXk them doesn't mean I can't have a aesthetic standard of good looking or ugly.I can say the behavior is ugly.
All aesthetic standard and physical attraction must base on sex?Maybe for you and some animals are right,not me.

That line above in bold? I can say, that your behavior is ugly.
You sound robotic.
It seems like you are trying to sound emotionless and without libido...like a character from a movie. Is this your culture's media influence on young people? (I'm not being bitchy here, I'm asking...literally...)

I can clearly see what western media influences are indeed influencing young people here, but that doesn't mean that it's the same elsewhere. Is the entertainment in your country showing a lot of this type of....almost an artificial person?
I'm seeing similar characters crop up, in movies like "Cloud Atlas" for example. Humans that are without emotion (or not allowed to show any)....same with libido....semi-robotic, yet still human.

Again, I'm asking....to learn. I'm not trying to offend anybody.
jacygirl

a reply to: jacygirl

I really feel the behavior of making internet porn ads is ugly.
I find many people in here really like judge my sexual orientation ,it's a ugly behavior also.

a reply to: jacygirl

You sounds envious of robotic humans. What is robotic, a person devoid of emotion? Not necessarily many people who are champions of great ethical deeds do so in a silent, manner with showing any outward physical characteristics of wearing their heart on their sleeve, they are just people who are brave and get on with what needs to be done without compliant. I think your reply was contrived.

a reply to: AthlonSavage

Envious and contrived?
I just lost a little of my previous respect for you, Athlon.

My reply was an honest question to the OP.
I consider any future involvement in this thread to be futile.

jacygirl