It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
The U.N. Human Rights Committee in Geneva on Thursday condemned the United States for criminalizing homelessness, calling it "cruel, inhuman and degrading treatment" that violates international human rights treaty obligations. It also called upon the U.S. government to take corrective action, following a two-day review of U.S. government compliance with a human rights treaty ratified in 1992.
"I'm just simply baffled by the idea that people can be without shelter in a country, and then be treated as criminals for being without shelter," said Sir Nigel Rodley, chairman of the committee in closing statements on the U.S. review. "The idea of criminalizing people who don't have shelter is something that I think many of my colleagues might find as difficult as I do to even begin to comprehend."
The Committee called on the U.S. to abolish criminalization of homelessness laws and policies at state and local levels, intensify efforts to find solutions for homeless people in accordance with human rights standards and offer incentives for decriminalization, including giving local authorities funding for implementing alternatives and withholding funding for criminalizing the homeless.
Those recommendations run counter to the current trends in the nation.
the FBI has since announced it is launching an investigation into the incident and said it is already probing 23 officer-involved shootings in Albuquerque since 2010. On Sunday, hundreds of people marched through Albuquerque to protest the number of police shootings in the city, a day-long event that ended when police fired tear gas into the crowd.
We hold these truths to be self-evident, that all men are created equal, that they are endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable Rights, that among these are Life, Liberty and the pursuit of Happiness.--That to secure these rights, Governments are instituted among Men, deriving their just powers from the consent of the governed
benrl
We certainly seem to be racking up some human rights issues.
I think we would be well to remember,
We hold these truths to be self-evident, that all men are created equal, that they are endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable Rights, that among these are Life, Liberty and the pursuit of Happiness.--That to secure these rights, Governments are instituted among Men, deriving their just powers from the consent of the governed
Its not all corporations are entitled to, Man.
Unalienable, universal, it was an Ideal to strive for, and we have gone so far from it.
We need to strive for those Ideals, even if it means corporate profits may suffer, that they may have to pay their fair share in taxes.
and yes, for societal programs like welfare.
Success that leaves so many behind, is no Success at all.
doubletap
benrl
We certainly seem to be racking up some human rights issues.
I think we would be well to remember,
We hold these truths to be self-evident, that all men are created equal, that they are endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable Rights, that among these are Life, Liberty and the pursuit of Happiness.--That to secure these rights, Governments are instituted among Men, deriving their just powers from the consent of the governed
Its not all corporations are entitled to, Man.
Unalienable, universal, it was an Ideal to strive for, and we have gone so far from it.
We need to strive for those Ideals, even if it means corporate profits may suffer, that they may have to pay their fair share in taxes.
and yes, for societal programs like welfare.
Success that leaves so many behind, is no Success at all.
I see the constitution doesn't really mean much to you, does it?
I see the constitution doesn't really mean much to you, does it? - See more at: www.abovetopsecret.com...
Not when our Current supreme court interprets it to mean that Corporations can have way more free speech than I, simply from the virtue of having money. - See more at: www.abovetopsecret.com...
doubletap
I see the constitution doesn't really mean much to you, does it?
BuzzyWigs
reply to post by benrl
Not when our Current supreme court interprets it to mean that Corporations can have way more free speech than I, simply from the virtue of having money. - See more at: www.abovetopsecret.com...
Yeah! That's another thing from this week that really made my blood boil.
WTH is happening here???
whywhynot
reply to post by BuzzyWigs
So what is the answer? Should the US elect a President that can change this?
WTH is happening here???
Apparently that makes me un-american,
whywhynot
reply to post by BuzzyWigs
So what is the answer? Should the US elect a President that can change this?
So what is the answer? Should the US elect a President that can change this?
beezzer
reply to post by BuzzyWigs
Imagine if instead of spending the 85 billion a month to Wall Street from Quantitative Easement, that money could be going to so many social programs here at home.
Just think of the problems solved with homelessness!