It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
g146541
The commentator in the 3rd video of the OP's post speculated that gangs were discussing how best to combat this corruption, how they might kick in the cops doors and kill them or get them when they check their mail.
I seriously doubt this will be the case, historically it is more popular to go after the "soft targets".
Charles Dorner did this and the media made the world hate him.
I expect to see "officers" wives and children pay for the sins of their fathers.
Don't look for the headlines to speak of dead cops, but of "collateral damage".
What a shame, all of this could have been avoided by "officers" thinking for themselves and crossing that thin blue line.
A good guy who supports criminals is actually a bad guy in a state of delusion.
Just wait, I bet I'm right on this one.
ItCameFromOuterSpace
Asktheanimals
"But he threatened a canine officer!"
There's something deeply wrong when there is greater concern for a dog than a human being.
How is it perfectly alright to let a dog bite the tar out of a guy you just shot multiple times?
I think the residents of Albuquerque have realized that could happen to anyone and don't like it at all.
Stupidly enough, the K9 is considered an officer. If you fight back against the dog that is mauling you, it is considered assault upon a police officer. You can't make this stuff up. That's how illogical and simply retarded the police and their system are.
Asktheanimals
"But he threatened a canine officer!"
There's something deeply wrong when there is greater concern for a dog than a human being.
How is it perfectly alright to let a dog bite the tar out of a guy you just shot multiple times?
I think the residents of Albuquerque have realized that could happen to anyone and don't like it at all.
TruthxIsxInxThexMist
reply to post by Blowback
I saw the video on skynews.
There was absolutely no need for the police to do that. All the guy did was pick up his bag, he was about to walk off. Why did they shoot the guy dead? He wasn't threatening. In fact I heard him say that he wasn't harming anyone and wasn't going to harm them.
panicman66
if this turns ugly, and i bet it will..... the demonstrators will loose......cops got guns and ammo....government controls MSM .
RickyD
reply to post by panicman66
We would still be English if we all thought like you do. No real change has ever occured without force. If you think there has please link me to something new cause I have yet to see real change without it being forced.
AnteBellum
It figures this would happen after I moved!
I always miss all the fun.
I wish they would of been more organized about it though, I kept telling them it's not going to end well unless they think it out fully first. Oh, well out of my hands now.
I hope the families on both sides at least learn something from this. . .