It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
poet1b
reply to post by mbkennel
I am not anti-west, but I am against the current state of ICBing.
The FRD got to where it is because they used to do business a whole lot differently, and they were backed by massive US industrial capacity, which has since then been sold off for profit.
Tusks
Can one de-link two fiat currencies--by fiat?
Stuship
reply to post by maddy21
The Cold War already proved how to defeat Russia, and it can easily be replicated without firing a shot.
signalfire
Umm, I don't pretend to understand any of this at all, but how much of that US 87% is fake fiat money that the Federal Reserve is flooding the globe with? It's not based on real economic output, nor goods or services. It's just traders (traitors) on Wall Street, if that.
And if Iceland can mostly decouple from the global banking economy (I think that's what they've done, maybe not)
then a country as massive as Russia should be able to mostly fend for themselves.
Are we all really so interconnected that we need to buy from and sell to everyone else on the planet?
Wouldn't a bit of 'buy local first' go a long ways to calm the saber rattling down and save resources?
Telos
mbkennel
Because thinking you can 'will' a currency in your own image for political purposes is a syndrome of a clueless dictator like Saddam and Gaddafi, and they tend to have many other problems.
Dictators? Really? Wasn't Saddam a dictator when was put in power by US and acted as their puppet until he got into his mind that he could change the reality in his region and get away from american grip?
This guy [Gaddafi] was labeled right away as a dictator despite the fact that his people loved and respected him, despite the fact that his country was blooming under his guide.
mbkennel
Telos
mbkennel
Because thinking you can 'will' a currency in your own image for political purposes is a syndrome of a clueless dictator like Saddam and Gaddafi, and they tend to have many other problems.
Dictators? Really? Wasn't Saddam a dictator when was put in power by US and acted as their puppet until he got into his mind that he could change the reality in his region and get away from american grip?
No. Saddam came to power in a brutal military coup. The Baath party was a nationalist & socialist party allied with Syria and the USSR, and opposed to the USA and its mideast allies. He and his country wasn't friendly with the USA, except as a matter of convenience when Iran's hostility turned out to be a worse problem.
Why did Saddam have a large 100% Soviet-built army?
ColCurious
reply to post by maddy21
Libertarians ought to be grateful to Putin for this. Not Putin the person obviously, but the role he is playing. Weird times indeed.