It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Scott Aviation / AVOX Systems, B/E Aerospace / Puritan Bennett, Sky Ox, Robertshaw, Adams Rite Aerospace, Kidde Aerospace, Kidde Graviner, HTL / Pacific Scientific, Amerex, Ansul, Buckeye
CaptainBeno
reply to post by smurfy
This is a fire extinguisher fitted to Boeing aircraft.
You can blatantly see the strap marks. The ports. etc etc.
What is quite amazing is, no one has mentioned the dark discoloration around the bottom of the bottle. (I.e Fire)
And also no one has mentioned the missing red sticker service tag.
I genuinely dont get what the suspicion is with the whole event....looks like a plane went down over the sea...again statistically speaking, given pilot suicide or systems failures likelihood it is the most likely scenario.
Jukiodone
The various pics provided of Halon fire suppression systems have a number of differences from the object found on the beach (2 large protrusions rather than 1 for e.g)
I genuinely dont get what the suspicion is with the whole event....looks like a plane went down over the sea...again statistically speaking, given pilot suicide or systems failures likelihood it is the most likely scenario.
edit on 26-3-2014 by Jukiodone because: (no reason given)
Agent008
reply to post by MotherMayEye
Everything about this plane seems like a distraction.
But this is a good find, can't wait to see what the serial numbers say.
TheLieWeLive
reply to post by Jukiodone
I genuinely dont get what the suspicion is with the whole event....looks like a plane went down over the sea...again statistically speaking, given pilot suicide or systems failures likelihood it is the most likely scenario.
...or they knew it was hi-jacked on day one and shot it out of the air to keep the on ground fatalities to a minimum. I don't believe any nation after 9/11 is going to allow a plane to be used as a missile again.
That to me is the most likely scenario and would explain all the runaround and confusion we've seen in the last weeks.
smurfy
TheLieWeLive
reply to post by Jukiodone
I genuinely dont get what the suspicion is with the whole event....looks like a plane went down over the sea...again statistically speaking, given pilot suicide or systems failures likelihood it is the most likely scenario.
...or they knew it was hi-jacked on day one and shot it out of the air to keep the on ground fatalities to a minimum. I don't believe any nation after 9/11 is going to allow a plane to be used as a missile again.
That to me is the most likely scenario and would explain all the runaround and confusion we've seen in the last weeks.
I would go some way with that, only by around 3.45 am they had to face the fact that there was a problem with the plane, but there is nothing to suggest that it had been hi-jacked at that time, or at that time they knew the plane was still flying, it was missing. The information of it being still in the air came much later. That's the sticking point, anytime between the sign off, and 3.45am is the only period to have knowledge of a hi-jack, and the only way to know in that scenario is that there was still some verbal contact to the plane that we have not been told about officially.
Given the amount of 'hams' around the world, I don't see that as being the case.
earthling42
reply to post by squarehead666
Maybe they wanted to land but were not able to do so because of limited control.
So they flew until they run out of fuel.
Speculation
A high dive is almost certain given the witnesses who testified that they had seen a jet flying very low towards Bachok.
So it could well be that something happened which forced them to fly on a lower and safe altitude.